Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/402,039

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 02, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2023 — provisional 63/610,780
Examiner
LEBENTRITT, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
924 granted / 1002 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/19/2024 and 10/21/2024 was filed after the mailing date of the first action on the merits. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yun et al, US 20220301943. Yun teaches: A method comprising: forming a plurality of nanowires (310) over semiconductor fins in both an n-type region (102) and in a p-type region (104); forming a hard mask layer (336) over a first set of the plurality of nanowires in the n- type region; performing a trimming process (para 62) on a second set of the plurality of nanowires in the p-type region; depositing silicon germanium (312) over each one nanowires of the second set of the plurality of nanowires; and performing an annealing (para 61) process on the second set of the plurality of nanowires, wherein the annealing process diffuses germanium into at least one of the second set of the plurality of nanowires forming a plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures in the p-type region, wherein the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures have different regions of varying germanium concentrations. (para 60, 61) Figure 16A and 16B 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the depositing silicon germanium and the annealing process occur in a same chemical vapor deposition chamber. (para 60,61) 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the plurality of nanowires comprises silicon and the annealing process diffuses up to about 20% concentration of germanium into a center of at least one of the second set of the plurality of nanowires. (para 61) 19. The method of claim 16, wherein the depositing silicon germanium is performed at a first temperature and the performing the annealing process occurs at a second temperature greater than the first temperature (para 44, and 60) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yun et al, US 20220301943 in view of Yeong et al, US 20210175129 A1 and in further view of TW 202009988 A. Yun teaches: A device comprising: a plurality of silicon nanostructures (310) above a semiconductor substrate in an n- type region (102) of the semiconductor substrate (302); a plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures (312) above the semiconductor substrate in a p-type region (104) of the semiconductor substrate (302). See figure 8B Yun fails to teach: a high-k dielectric layer surrounding at least one of the plurality of silicon nanostructures and at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures; and a gate electrode filling in a gap between adjacent ones of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. Yeong teaches: [0049] As illustrated in FIGS. 14A and 14B, portions of the high-k dielectric layer 220 respectively surround the first interfacial layers 210a and can be referred to as first high-k dielectric linings 220a, and other portions of the high-k dielectric layer 220 respectively surround the second interfacial layers 210b and can be referred to as second high-k dielectric linings 220b. Portions of the first high-k dielectric sheath layers 230 respectively surround the first high-k dielectric linings 220a and can be referred to as first high-k dielectric sheaths 230a, and portions of the second high-k dielectric sheath layers 250 respectively surround the second high-k dielectric linings 220b and can be referred to as second high-k dielectric sheaths 250b. A portion of the metal layer 260 surrounds the first high-k dielectric sheaths 230a and can be referred to as a first metal gate electrode 260a, and a portion of the metal layer 260 surrounds the second high-k dielectric sheaths 250b and can be referred to as a second metal gate electrode 260b. [0050] The first interfacial layers 210a, first high-k dielectric linings 220a, first high-k dielectric sheaths 230a, and first metal gate electrode 260a can be in combination serve as a first gate stack GS1 for the first nanowires 108A. The second interfacial layers 210b, second high-k dielectric linings 220b, second high-k dielectric sheaths 250b, and second metal gate electrode 260b can be in combination serve as a second gate stack GS2 for the second nanowires 108B. Yun and Yeong fail to teach: wherein at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures comprises: a silicon core region having a first concentration of germanium, wherein the first concentration of germanium is about 20% or less; a first silicon germanium region having a first interface between the silicon core region and the first silicon germanium region; and a second silicon germanium region having a second interface between the first silicon germanium region and the second silicon germanium region, the second silicon germanium region having a second concentration of germanium, wherein the second concentration of germanium is up to about 40%; wherein a first concentration gradient of germanium increases from the first concentration of germanium at the first interface to the second concentration of germanium at the second interface; Yun teaches: (para 39) In various embodiments, the semiconductor layers 312 have compositions that provide for different oxidation rates and/or different etch selectivity from the semiconductor layers 310. In an embodiment, the semiconductor layers 312 include silicon germanium (Si.sub.1-xGe.sub.x), while the semiconductor layers 310 include silicon (Si). In some embodiments, each layer 312 is Si.sub.1-xGe.sub.x that includes about 10% to about 100% (0.1≤x≤1) Ge in molar ratio. A sufficient amount of Ge in each layer 312 helps convert the channel region 128 in the fin 104 from a first-type (e.g., n-type) to a second-type (e.g., p-type). For example, Ge may comprise about 60% to about 80% of the layer 312 of Si.sub.1-xGe.sub.x in molar ratio. Such a range of Ge, combined with subsequent processing steps, effectively converts the channel region 128 from the first-type to the second-type. Further, the semiconductor layers 312 may include different compositions among them. TW 202009988 A teaches: In FIG. 7, the first thin layer 205 of the superlattice 203 (for example, a thin layer of silicon germanium) can be formed as the first tapered layer of two or more gradient layers of the same semiconductor material 700, each gradient layer has a concentration percentage of semiconductor material elements. In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7, the first tapered layer 700 may be formed as a tapered layer of a first semiconductor material (eg, silicon germanium), including a first gradient layer 701 having a first gradient percentage (For example: silicon germanium with a first percentage of germanium), a second gradient layer 703 with a second gradient percentage (for example: a silicon germanium with a second percentage of germanium), and a third gradient percentage with a third gradient Three gradient layers 705 (for example: silicon germanium with a third percentage of germanium). See English translation Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the above references, because a multi-layer structure is formed including highly controlled diffusion interfaces between alternating layers of different semiconductor materials. (abstract TW 202009988 A) In regards to the concentration ranges, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize these values though routine experimentation and would not lend itself to patentability in the instant application without displaying unexpected results. (in Re Aller) TW 202009988 A further teaches: 2.The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures further comprises a third silicon germanium region having a third interface between the second silicon germanium region and the third silicon germanium region and an exterior surface opposite the third interface, wherein a second concentration gradient of germanium decreases from the second concentration of germanium at the third interface to about 0% germanium at the exterior surface. (see figure 7) 3.The device of claim 1, wherein the gap between at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures is in a range of about 3 nm to about 10 nm. In regards to the thickness ranges, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize these values though routine experimentation and would not lend itself to patentability in the instant application without displaying unexpected results. (in Re Aller) 4.The device of claim 1, wherein respective ones of the plurality of silicon nanostructures has a same width as respective ones of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. In regards to the width ranges, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize these values though routine experimentation and would not lend itself to patentability in the instant application without displaying unexpected results. (in Re Aller) TW 202009988 A further teaches: 5. The device of claim 1, further comprising a silicon cap layer (207) surrounding at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. Figure 8 6. The device of claim 5, wherein the silicon cap layer has a thickness in a range about .5 nm to about 2 nm. In regards to the thickness ranges, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize these values though routine experimentation and would not lend itself to patentability in the instant application without displaying unexpected results. (in Re Aller) Yeong further teaches 7. The device of claim 1, further comprising an interface layer (210) disposed between at least one of the silicon germanium nanostructures and the high-k dielectric layer (230), wherein the interface layer comprises silicon oxide. Figure 14B and para 50 Yun et al further teaches: 8. The device of claim 1, further comprising a dielectric structure (324) disposed between the n-type region and the p-type region, wherein the dielectric structure (324) electrically isolates the plurality of silicon nanostructures from the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. Figure 8B Yun teaches: 9. A method comprising: forming a plurality of silicon nanostructures (310) above a semiconductor substrate (302) in an n-type region (102) of the semiconductor substrate; forming a plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures (312) above the semiconductor substrate (302) in a p-type region (104) of the semiconductor substrate, See figure 8B Yun fails to teach: depositing a high-k dielectric layer surrounding at least one of the plurality of silicon nanostructures and at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures; and forming a gate electrode filling in a gap between adjacent ones of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. See figure 14 and para 49, 50 Yeong teaches: depositing a high-k dielectric layer (230) surrounding at least one of the plurality of silicon nanostructures (108a) and at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures (108b); and forming a gate electrode (260) filling in a gap between adjacent ones of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. See figure 14 and para 49, 50 Yun and Yeong fail to teach: wherein at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures comprises: a silicon core region having a first concentration of germanium, wherein the first concentration of germanium is about 20% or less; a first silicon germanium region having a first interface between the silicon core region and the first silicon germanium region; and a second silicon germanium region having a second interface between the first silicon germanium region and the second silicon germanium region, the second silicon germanium region having a second concentration of germanium, wherein the second concentration of germanium is up to about 40%; wherein a first concentration gradient of germanium increases from the first concentration of germanium at the first interface to the second concentration of germanium at the second interface. Yun teaches: (para 39) In various embodiments, the semiconductor layers 312 have compositions that provide for different oxidation rates and/or different etch selectivity from the semiconductor layers 310. In an embodiment, the semiconductor layers 312 include silicon germanium (Si.sub.1-xGe.sub.x), while the semiconductor layers 310 include silicon (Si). In some embodiments, each layer 312 is Si.sub.1-xGe.sub.x that includes about 10% to about 100% (0.1≤x≤1) Ge in molar ratio. A sufficient amount of Ge in each layer 312 helps convert the channel region 128 in the fin 104 from a first-type (e.g., n-type) to a second-type (e.g., p-type). For example, Ge may comprise about 60% to about 80% of the layer 312 of Si.sub.1-xGe.sub.x in molar ratio. Such a range of Ge, combined with subsequent processing steps, effectively converts the channel region 128 from the first-type to the second-type. Further, the semiconductor layers 312 may include different compositions among them. TW 202009988 A teaches: In FIG. 7, the first thin layer 205 of the superlattice 203 (for example, a thin layer of silicon germanium) can be formed as the first tapered layer of two or more gradient layers of the same semiconductor material 700, each gradient layer has a concentration percentage of semiconductor material elements. In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7, the first tapered layer 700 may be formed as a tapered layer of a first semiconductor material (eg, silicon germanium), including a first gradient layer 701 having a first gradient percentage (For example: silicon germanium with a first percentage of germanium), a second gradient layer 703 with a second gradient percentage (for example: a silicon germanium with a second percentage of germanium), and a third gradient percentage with a third gradient Three gradient layers 705 (for example: silicon germanium with a third percentage of germanium). See English translation Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the above references, because a multi-layer structure is formed including highly controlled diffusion interfaces between alternating layers of different semiconductor materials. (abstract TW 202009988 A) In regards to the concentration ranges, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize these values though routine experimentation and would not lend itself to patentability in the instant application without displaying unexpected results. (in Re Aller) TW 202009988 A further teaches: 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures further comprises a third silicon germanium region having a third interface between the second silicon germanium region and the third silicon germanium region and an exterior surface opposite the third interface, wherein a second concentration gradient of germanium decreases from the second concentration of germanium at the third interface to about 0% germanium at the exterior surface. (see figure 7) Yun further teaches: 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the forming the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures comprises: trimming a plurality of silicon nanostructures above the semiconductor substrate in the p-type region of the semiconductor substrate forming a plurality of trimmed silicon nanostructures (para 66); depositing silicon germanium over the plurality of trimmed silicon nanostructures (para 60); and performing an annealing process to diffuse germanium into the plurality of trimmed silicon nanostructures, wherein the annealing process forms the silicon core region, the first silicon germanium region, the second silicon germanium region, and the third silicon germanium region of at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. Para 62 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the depositing silicon germanium is a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) performed in a CVD chamber at a first temperature. (para 62) 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the annealing process is performed in the CVD chamber at a second temperature greater than the first temperature. (para 44) TW 202009988 A further teaches: 14. The method of claim 9, further comprising forming a silicon cap layer (107) surrounding at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. See Figure 8 Yeong further teaches 15. The method of claim 9, further comprising forming an interface layer (210) disposed between respective ones of the silicon germanium nanostructures (108) and the high-k dielectric layer (230), wherein the interface layer comprises silicon oxide. See figure 14B and para 50 Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yun et al as applied to claim 16 above, and further in view of TW 202009988 A. TW 202009988 A further teaches: 20. The method of claim 16, further comprising forming a silicon cap layer (107) surrounding at least one of the plurality of silicon germanium nanostructures. See Figure 8 In view of this disclosure, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the above references, because the silicon cap layer is conventionally formed as a passivation to prevent contaminant degradation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL LEBENTRITT whose telephone number is (571)272-1873. The examiner can normally be reached IFP Mon- Fri 8:30 am- 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached at (571)272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL . LEBENTRITT Primary Examiner Art Unit 2893 /MICHAEL LEBENTRITT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684779
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE, METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677620
SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE AND SURFACE TREATMENT AGENT COMPOSITION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12652915
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12630419
PRODUCTION METHOD FOR A MICROMECHANICAL SENSOR APPARATUS, AND CORRESPONDING MICROMECHANICAL SENSOR APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635584
THREE-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH TOP CHIP INCLUDING SCHOTTKY DIODE BODY CONTACT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month