Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/402,950

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FORMING STRUCTURES COMPRISING A THRESHOLD VOLTAGE TUNING LAYER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 03, 2024
Examiner
OWENS, DOUGLAS W
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Asm Ip Holding B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
265 granted / 328 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
357
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§102
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 328 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. carbon (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 3, 5 – 8, 11 – 15, and 17 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0266055 to Ivanova et al. Regarding claim 1, Ivanova et al. teach a method (Fig. 1, for example) of forming a structure comprising a threshold voltage tuning layer, the method comprising: providing a substrate comprising a substrate surface within a reaction chamber (110); providing a treatment reactant comprising a metal treatment precursor to the reaction chamber to form a treated surface on the substrate surface (120); and depositing threshold voltage tuning material (130) overlying the treated surface, wherein the treatment reactant inherently inhibits deposition of the threshold voltage tuning material since it is identical to the material of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 2, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the metal treatment precursor comprises hafnium (120). Regarding claim 3, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the metal treatment precursor comprises one of more hafnium chloride (HfCl4), tetrakis (ethylmethylamido) hafnium (TEMAHf), bis(methylcyclopentadienyl) methylmethozy Hf (¶¶ [0034], [0058], [0059]). Regarding claim 5, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the step of depositing threshold voltage tuning material comprises a cyclical deposition process comprising: providing a threshold voltage tuning material precursor to the reaction chamber; and providing voltage tuning material reactant to the reaction chamber. See Fig. 1. Regarding claim 6, Ivanova et al. inherently teach a method, wherein the threshold voltage tuning layer material removes a ligand of the treatment reactant on the treated surface since the method and materials used are identical. Regarding claim 7, Ivanova et al. teach a method (Fig. 1, for example) of forming a structure comprising a threshold voltage tuning layer, the method comprising: providing a substrate comprising a substrate surface within a reaction chamber (110); providing a treatment reactant comprising a carbon-containing treatment (120, ¶ [0071]) precursor to the reaction chamber to form a treated surface on the substrate surface; and depositing threshold voltage tuning material (130) overlying the treated surface. Regarding claim 8, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the carbon-containing treatment precursor comprises an aminosilane (¶ [0069]). Regarding claim 11, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the carbon-containing treatment precursor comprises an alcohol (¶ [0075]). Regarding claim 12, Ivanova et al. teach a method, further comprising repeating the steps of providing the treatment reactant to the reaction chamber and depositing the threshold voltage tuning material overlying the treated surface to form the threshold voltage tuning layer (See Fig. 1). Regarding claim 13, Ivanova et al. teach a method (Fig. 1, for example) of forming a structure comprising a threshold voltage tuning layer, the method comprising: providing a substrate comprising a substrate surface within a reaction chamber (120); and using a cyclical deposition process (150), depositing threshold voltage tuning material (130) overlying the substrate surface, wherein the cyclical deposition process comprises: providing a metal deposition precursor (120) to the reaction chamber; providing a silicon precursor to the reaction chamber (¶ [0087]); and providing an oxidant (¶ [0092]) to the reaction chamber. Regarding claim 14, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the step of providing the metal deposition precursor comprises providing a carbon-free, halogen-containing metal precursor (¶ [0056]). Regarding claim 15, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the step of providing the silicon precursor comprises providing a carbon-free, halogen-containing silicon precursor (¶ [0087]). Regarding claims 17 and 18, Ivanova et al. teach a method (Fig. 1) of forming a structure comprising a threshold voltage tuning layer, the method comprising: providing a substrate comprising a substrate surface within a reaction chamber (120); depositing threshold voltage tuning material overlying the substrate surface (130); providing an etchant comprising betadiketonate (¶ [0069]) to the reaction chamber to form the threshold voltage tuning layer; and forming a metal oxide layer over the threshold voltage tuning layer (¶ [0119]). Regarding claim 19, Ivanova et al. teach a method, further comprising a step of treating the surface of the substrate with a treatment reactant to inhibit growth of the threshold voltage tuning material (¶ [0069], the etchant betadiketonate inhibits growth). Regarding claim 20, Ivanova et al. teach a method, wherein the threshold voltage tuning layer comprises lanthanum oxide (130). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 9, 10, and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent No. 10,867,869 to Lee et al. teach a method of forming a structure comprising a threshold voltage tuning layer including providing a metal treatment precursor and depositing a threshold voltage tuning material. Lee et al. do not specifically teach providing the substrate in a reaction chamber, or a silicon precursor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS W OWENS whose telephone number is (571)272-1662. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-1:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at 571-270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DOUGLAS W. OWENS, Esq. Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2897 /DOUGLAS W OWENS/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593716
SUBSTRATE ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588538
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING WIRED UNDER BUMP STRUCTURE AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581937
INTEGRATED DEVICE COMPRISING METALLIZATION INTERCONNECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564085
MICROELECTRONIC ASSEMBLY WITH UNDERFILL FLOW CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563882
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month