Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/404,997

A newest preparation method (NT-PB) and applications for improving ATP utilization in animal muscle cells

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Examiner
PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI
Art Unit
1793
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Numega Nutrition Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
322 granted / 714 resolved
-19.9% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application Receipt is acknowledged of the amendment and response filed 4/6/2026. Claims 1,4 and 8 were amended and claim 2 was canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 3-8 are rejected under 35 USC 103 as being unpatentable over Gastner et al. (US20130296231A1). Regarding claims 1,3 and 6-8, Gastner discloses the use of guanidinoacetic acid and/or salts thereof as feed additive, in predominantly vegetarian diets, in particular use being made of salts with hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid and phosphoric acid. The use proceeds especially in individual doses from 0.01 to100 g/kg of feed in the form of powders, granules, pastilles or capsules, the feed additive also being able to be used in combination with other physiologically active materials of value. The claimed use which is suitable especially for breeding and growing livestock, has recourse to a compound which is in particular stable in aqueous solution, can be converted to creatine under physiological conditions, and, in contrast to other guanidine derivatives, is completely available to physiological sectors of use. Gastner discloses that depending on the respective specific application, to use guanidinoacetic acid and salts thereof as feed additive in combination with other physiologically active compounds, in particular carbohydrates, fats, amino acids proteins, vitamins, minerals, trace elements and derivatives thereof and any desired mixtures thereof being particularly suitable. Preference is given to methionine, betaine and choline and also other physiologically active methyl group donors. Betaine and choline, in the presence of homocysteine, can be converted to methionine in the body, which especially plays a role in the synthesis of creatine from guanidinoacetic acid. Here, methyl groups are required which are transferred from S-adenosylmethionine with formation of homocysteine. If betaine or choline are insufficiently available, methionine is consumed and a methionine deficit can occur in metabolism. Regarding ither trace minerals and selenium supplementation, trace minerals and vitamins are routinely added to animal feeds and the role of selenium supplementation in modulating plasma homocysteine levels was known at the time of the invention. In effect, maintaining redox balance is known to benefit health and well- being. Gastner discloses adding carnitine to feed compositions [0034]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have added known vitamins and minerals to a composition of guanidinoacetic acid methionine betaine and other methyl group donors to maintain cellular redox balance with a reasonable expectation of successfully preparing a feed additive composition with targeted health benefits. The effect “improves ATP utilization in animal muscle cells” is not qualified by a relationship between ATP utilization and feed efficiency or growth as described in the disclosure and quantitative improvement over the untreated group. The open-ended transitional phrase “includes” in the independent claim does not preclude additional components. Gastner discloses a method comprising improving feed uptake, increasing growth performance, increasing muscle meat gain, increasing meat quality or increasing reproduction performance in an animal by administering a sufficient amount of feed additive as a part of a diet for the animal, wherein the feed additive comprises guanidinoacetic, acid or a salt thereof (for example see claim 10). Individual doses are generally in the range from about 10 mg and about 600 mg, preferably in the range from about 25 to about 125 mg. In the case of pigs, daily doses, per kg of live mass, are, for example, in the range from about 10 mg and about 1000 mg [0026]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include suitable amounts in mixed formulations with methionine, betaine, choline, vitamins, trace minerals in generally used amounts to prepare a composition effecting improved ATP utilization in an animal, with a reasonable expectation of success. Gastner discloses [0018] that in contrast to creatine and creatine monohydrate, guanidinoacetic acid and salts thereof are more stable in acidic aqueous solution and therefore gastric environment, and they are not converted to creatine until under physiological conditions after resorption, principally in the liver. Thus in contrast to creatine, they are therefore available in the corresponding physiological metabolic reactions and the energy cycle and improve ATP utilization in animals. Regarding the claims 4 and 5, the method steps claimed are routinely employed in making enteric-coated pellets with active ingredients in the core. Claims 1 and 3-8 are therefore prima facie obvious in view of the art. Response to Arguments Claim amendments and applicant’s arguments render the previous rejection of claims under 35 USC 112(b) and 35 USC 102(a)(1) moot. Regarding the rejection of claims under 35 USC 103, applicant’s arguments have been considered, but are not commensurate in scope with the claimed invention: The open-ended transitional phrase “includes” does not preclude other components in the claimed composition. The effect “improves ATP utilization in animal muscle cells” is not qualified by a relationship between ATP utilization and feed efficiency or growth as described in the disclosure and quantitative improvement over the untreated group. Although the term “synergistic” is applied to the composition in the disclosure, there is no evidentiary support for the “synergy” between the components in the claimed ratios alone. For these reasons, the rejection under 35 USC 103 is maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Subbalakshmi Prakash whose telephone number is (571)270-3685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Le can be reached at (571) 272-0903. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUBBALAKSHMI PRAKASH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1793
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696908
REACTIVE GAS, REACTIVE GAS GENERATION SYSTEM AND PRODUCT TREATMENT USING REACTIVE GAS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12677859
POWDERED SOY SAUCE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672665
FOOD MANUFACTURING SUPPORT APPARATUS, FOOD MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667108
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR THE FINAL PROOFING OF DOUGH
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660834
METHOD FOR SMEAR-RIPENING OF CHEESE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+37.1%)
3y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month