Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Numega Nutrition Pte. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI, and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The focus of the current prosecution is therefore limited to a single technical and administrative channel. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit ensures that the technical review is conducted within a specific specialized group in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
The busiest examiner, PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI, is responsible for 1 pending office action, which constitutes the entirety of the company's 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the applicant faces a streamlined examination process. This alignment between the pending action and the examiner simplifies the management of the portfolio. The presence of 1 distinct examiner ensures that the applicant has a single point of contact for the current filing. This structure minimizes the complexity of managing multiple pending office actions across different units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI | 1 | 45.7% | +36.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18404997 | A newest preparation method (NT-PB) and applications for improving ATP utilization in animal muscle cells | PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI | 126d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1793 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18404997 | A newest preparation method (NT-PB) and applications for improving ATP utilization in animal muscle cells | PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI | 1793 | §103 | Final Rejection | 126d overdue | Pending | Jan 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial