Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/405,786

DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Examiner
KIM, TONG-HO
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
991 granted / 1040 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1082
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1040 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/5/2024 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11, 14-15 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sui (US 2023/0088187) in view of Zhang (US 2019/0229282). Regarding claim 11, Sui discloses, in at least figures 3, 8, and related text, a display apparatus including a display panel (100, [76]) in which a penetration- opening (S, [47]) is defined, the display apparatus comprising: a substrate layer (101, [82]) including a first display portion (left display unit 1, [81], figures), a second display portion (right display unit 1, [81], figures), and a connection portion (connection unit 2, [82], figures) extending to the first display portion (left display unit 1, [81], figures) and the second display portion (right display unit 1, [81], figures); a pixel disposed (pixel of left display unit 1, [81], [87], figures) on the first display portion (left display unit 1, [81], figures); and a wiring (202, [89]) disposed on the connection portion (connection unit 2, [82], figures). Sui does not explicitly disclose concave portions are provided in a rear surface of the substrate layer, and the concave portions overlap at least one of the first display portion, the second display portion, and the connection portion. Zhang teaches, in at least figures 1-2 and related text, the device comprising concave portions (3, [31]) are provided in a rear surface of the substrate layer (1, [31]), and the concave portions (3, [31]) overlap at least one of the first display portion (2, [31]), the second display portion, and the connection portion, for the purpose of providing a flexible OLED display panel with reduced stress of flexible substrate when the flexible OLED display panel is been curved ([6]). Sui and Zhang are analogous art because they both are directed to display device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Sui with the specified features of Zhang because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Sui to have the concave portions being provided in a rear surface of the substrate layer, and the concave portions overlapping at least one of the first display portion, the second display portion, and the connection portion, as taught by Zhang, for the purpose of providing a flexible OLED display panel with reduced stress of flexible substrate when the flexible OLED display panel is been curved ([6], Zhang). Regarding claim 14, Sui in view of Zhang discloses the display apparatus of claim 11 as described above. Zhang further teaches, in at least figures 1-2 and related text, at least two of the concave portions (3, [31]) overlap the first display portion (2, [31]), for the purpose of providing a flexible OLED display panel with reduced stress of flexible substrate when the flexible OLED display panel is been curved ([6]). Regarding claim 15, Sui in view of Zhang discloses the display apparatus of claim 11 as described above. Zhang further teaches, in at least figures 1-2 and related text, the concave portions (3, [31]) include a first concave portion (3 located at center, figures), and the first concave portion (3 located at center, figures) overlaps a central portion of the first display portion (2, [31]), for the purpose of providing a flexible OLED display panel with reduced stress of flexible substrate when the flexible OLED display panel is been curved ([6]). Regarding claim 19, Sui in view of Zhang discloses the display apparatus of claim 11 as described above. Sui further discloses, in at least figures 3, 8, and related text, an encapsulation layer (3, [77]) disposed on the first display portion (left display unit 1, [81], figures), the second display portion (right display unit 1, [81], figures), and the connection portion (connection unit 2, [82], figures). Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sui (US 2023/0088187) in view of Zhang (US 2019/0229282), and further in view of Choi (US 2018/0046221). Regarding claim 20, Sui in view of Zhang discloses the display apparatus of claim 19 as described above. Sui in view of Zhang does not explicitly disclose the encapsulation layer includes a first inorganic layer and a second inorganic layer. Choi teaches, in at least figure 4 and related text, the device comprising the encapsulation layer (230, [62]) includes a first inorganic layer (233, [62]) and a second inorganic layer (235, [62]), for the purpose of effectively preventing penetration of external oxygen or moisture ([65]). Sui, Zhang, and Choi are analogous art because they all are directed to display device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Sui in view of Zhang with the specified features of Choi because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Sui in view of Zhang to have the encapsulation layer including a first inorganic layer and a second inorganic layer, as taught by Choi, for the purpose of effectively preventing penetration of external oxygen or moisture ([65], Choi). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 are allowed because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the base claims 1 that recite "the inorganic pattern layers overlap at least one of the display area and the connection area" in combination with other elements of the base claims 1. Claim 12 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the base claims 11 and 12 that recite "the concave portions include a first concave portion, and the first concave portion overlaps the first display portion, extends along a circumference of the first display portion, and is provided in a closed loop shape" in combination with other elements of the base claims 11 and 12. Claim 13 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the base claims 11 and 13 that recite "the first concave portion overlaps the first display portion, extends along a circumference of the first display portion, and is provided in a closed loop shape, and the second concave portion overlaps the first display portion, extends along the circumference of the first display portion, and is provided in a closed loop shape" in combination with other elements of the base claims 11 and 13. Claim 16 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the base claims 11 and 16 that recite "the concave portions do not overlap the first display portion and overlap the connection portion" in combination with other elements of the base claims 11 and 16. Claims 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the base claims 11 and 17 that recite "a first insulating layer disposed on the substrate layer of the first display portion and including a first tip protruding toward the penetration-opening" in combination with other elements of the base claims 11 and 17. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONG-HO KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0276. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:30 AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONG-HO KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598777
LOW TEMPERATURE, HIGH GERMANIUM, HIGH BORON SIGE:B PEPI WITH TITANIUM SILICIDE CONTACTS FOR ULTRA-LOW PMOS CONTACT RESISTIVITY AND THERMAL STABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598764
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598787
FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR WITH DUAL LAYER ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598831
PIXEL SHIELDING USING AIR GAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598802
High-Voltage Tolerant Device and Detection Circuit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+0.4%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1040 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month