Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/416,480

HOLOGRAPHIC DISPLAY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING EFFECTS OF QUANTISATION NOISE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Priority
Jul 21, 2021 — GB 2110495.5 +1 more
Examiner
VU, PHU
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Vividq Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
863 granted / 1011 resolved
+17.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1035
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1011 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the generating" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17 and 19-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1-17 and 19-20 the prior art of record does not teach a Fourier transform of the target light field, F(H), substantially does not overlap (i) a Fourier transform of a complex conjugate of the target light field, F(H*), (ii) a Fourier transform of the target light field multiplied by the complex conjugate of the target light field, F(HH*), (iii) a Fourier transform of a square of the target light field, F(H²), and (iv) a Fourier transform of a square of the complex conjugate of the light field F(H*2); and the aperture substantially corresponds to F(H) in the Fourier plane. Lee US 2017/0185037 teaches a holographic display system comprising: a light source configured to emit at least partially coherent light; a modulator arranged to be illuminated by the at least partially coherent light and to generate a light field which is a quantised representation of a target light field, H; and a spatial filter delimiting an aperture in a Fourier plane. Kim US 2021/0181678 teaches a Holographic display using fourier analysis and compensation of higher order noise and complex conjugate signals however this still would not provide rational to specifically optimize the Fourier transforms i-iv of the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHU VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1562. The examiner can normally be reached 11:00 - 7:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHU VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697872
SMART SURFACE, CENTER CONSOLE FOR VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693542
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693502
IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM LENS ASSEMBLY, IMAGING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687732
Multi-Channel Optical Module
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681313
HEAD-MOUNTABLE DEVICES WITH MODULAR LENS ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1011 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month