Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Vividq Limited currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This prosecution activity is distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a spread of intellectual property interests even within a specific technical field. The presence of 2 art units suggests that the company's innovations may bridge different sub-specialties within the broader semiconductor and optics category, requiring a versatile approach to patent strategy.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Practitioners should note the balance of the workload, as no single examiner or art unit dominates the current pending queue beyond this individual assignment. Having 2 distinct examiners for the 2 pending actions means each application is receiving a unique perspective, which can lead to varied prosecution timelines and outcomes across the portfolio. This diversification of examiners and art units can be a strategic advantage, as it prevents the company's entire pending portfolio from being subject to the specific tendencies or backlogs of a single office official.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH | 1 | 60.6% | +12.5% |
| VU, PHU | 1 | 85.3% | +9.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18604274 | EYEBOX TARGETING USING AN IMAGE-REPLICATING COMBINER | TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2896 | 1 |
| 2871 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18604274 | EYEBOX TARGETING USING AN IMAGE-REPLICATING COMBINER | TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH | 2896 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Mar 13, 2024 |
| 18416480 | HOLOGRAPHIC DISPLAY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING EFFECTS OF QUANTISATION NOISE | VU, PHU | 2871 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial