Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/417,671

HEATER ASSEMBLY, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 21, 2021 — continuation of PCTJP2021027285 +1 more
Examiner
BENNETT, CHARLEE
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kokusai Electric Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
333 granted / 568 resolved
-6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
623
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 568 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Claim(s) 1-2, 4-7, 17-19 is/are amended. Applicant’s arguments, see pp. 15-19, filed 07/01/2026, with respect to claims 1, 17-18 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejections of 04/03/2026 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 14, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 14 and 15 fail to further limit at least claim 1 as the same limitations are recited in claims 14 and 15 that have been incorporated into claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-13, 16-19 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record discloses a heater assembly for heating a pipe comprising: a first heater sheet including: a first electric heater having no self-controllability and a first insulator electrically insulating and surrounding the first electric heater, the first heater sheet being deformable in accordance with a shape of the pipe; and one or more second heater sheets each including: one or more second electric heaters having self-controllability and a second insulator electrically insulating and surrounding the one or more second electric heaters, the one or more second heater sheets being deformable in accordance with the shape of the pipe; wherein, in use, the first heater sheet and the one or more second heater sheets are configured to be wound around the pipe; wherein the second electric heaters comprise N second electric heaters, each second electric heater being arranged within a corresponding region having a lengthwise length corresponding to 1/N of a lengthwise length of the first heater sheet; and wherein the N second electric heaters are electrically connected in parallel. However the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest such that the first heater sheet and the one or more second heater sheets are disposed opposite to each other across the pipe with respective lengthwise directions extending along a lengthwise direction of the pipe, as set forth in the present claims. The apparatus of Lewandowski in view of Kenji, Miyashita does not disclose the limitations above. Further, no other prior art was located that fairly suggested the claimed invention in whole or in part, along with the requisite motivation for combination, to anticipate or render the claimed invention obvious. This subject matter is therefore rendered allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 8901464 discloses variable thickness employed in a parallel circuit configuration of a layered heater (42, Fig. 9), rather than a series circuit configuration (c. 6, l. 53-65). US 20130062338 discloses various embodiments (Fig. 1-3) of a jacket heater (10) covering a pipe (20). US 20170107620 discloses a heating part (310, Fig. 4A-4C) heating a gas pipe (10) made of a metallic material, where the heating part (310) is installed to cover the surface of the gas pipe (10, para. [0058]). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Charlee J. C. Bennett whose telephone number is (571)270-7972. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 5712725166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Charlee J. C. Bennett/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 01, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742241
HEATING APPARATUS, CVD EQUIPMENT INCLUDING THE HEATING APPARATUS
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744148
TRANSFORMER DEVICE AND PLASMA GENERATING APPARATUS CONTAINING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738465
SURFACE MODIFICATION METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731771
LOWER DEPOSITION CHAMBER CCP ELECTRODE CLEANING SOLUTION
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733425
MEMBER FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+34.9%)
3y 8m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 568 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month