Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/443,311

DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 13, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0091014
Examiner
PATEL, REEMA
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
996 granted / 1122 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1156
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1122 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (encompassing claims 1-17) in the reply filed on 5/18/26 is acknowledged. Claims 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 2/16/24. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the passivation layer" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purposes of examination, the examiner interprets “a protective layer” in line 2 of claim 2 as - - a passivation layer - - to resolve the lack of antecedent basis. However, appropriate correction and/or clarification is requested. Claims 3-8 depend on claim 2. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the passivation layer" in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 depends on claim 2. For the purposes of examination, the examiner interprets “a protective layer” in line 2 of claim 2 as - - a passivation layer - - to resolve the lack of antecedent basis. However, appropriate correction and/or clarification is requested. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the passivation layer" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 depends on claim 2. For the purposes of examination, the examiner interprets “a protective layer” in line 2 of claim 2 as - - a passivation layer - - to resolve the lack of antecedent basis. However, appropriate correction and/or clarification is requested. Claims 5-7 depend on claim 4. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the passivation layer" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 5 depends on claim 4, which itself depends on claim 2. For the purposes of examination, the examiner interprets “a protective layer” in line 2 of claim 2 as - - a passivation layer - - to resolve the lack of antecedent basis. However, appropriate correction and/or clarification is requested. Claims 6-7 depend on claim 5. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 9-17 are allowed. Claim 1 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation the separator disconnects the portions of the light emitting auxiliary layer; the electrostatic element unit includes a first voltage line electrically connected to the scan driver and a plurality of electrostatic elements electrically connected to the first voltage line; a plurality of contact holes overlaps the first voltage line located in the electrostatic element unit; and, an insulating layer is located in the contact holes in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claim 9 depends on claim 1. Claim 10 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation of an electrostatic element positioned on the peripheral area and a first voltage line, and a second voltage line electrically connected to the electrostatic element; a passivation layer positioned on the transistor, the first voltage line, and the second voltage line, the pixel insulating layer is positioned between adjacent pixel electrodes among the plurality of pixel electrodes and includes a concave separator, and the passivation layer has a contact hole positioned on the first voltage line in the peripheral area in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 11-17 depend on claim 10. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Baek et al. (U.S. 2022/0173351 A1) and Choung et al. (U.S. 2015/0014658 A1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REEMA PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1436. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REEMA PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677516
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SELF-ALIGNED LEDS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677443
SELF-ALIGNED SUBSTRATE ISOLATION (SASI) OF GATE-ALL-AROUND NANOSHEET FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672522
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF TESTING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672452
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666716
CMOS STRUCTURE, AND FABRICATION METHODS OF FINFET CMOS, FD CMOS AND GAA CMOS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1122 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month