Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/448,412

QUANTUM DOT COMPLEX, METHOD FOR PREPARING THE QUANTUM DOT COMPLEX, AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE QUANTUM DOT COMPLEX

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 11, 2023
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1217 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1-14 and 18-20 in the reply filed on 11/21/2025 is acknowledged. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 9-13 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mocatta (20190382656). Regarding claim 1, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex comprising: a quantum dot (par. 245 forming nanosized materials to from QDs) and a plurality of ligands binding to a surface of the quantum dot (please see below), wherein the plurality of ligands include: a first ligand (par. 50, 57 and 192 teaches the QDs formed from nanosized clusters have a plurality of first ligands, second ligands and a plurality of third ligands) including a first acid functional group (par. 44 teaches the first ligand and the second ligand are, independently or dependently of each other, selected from one or more members of the group consisting of carboxylic acids, metal carboxylate ligands and phosphonic acids); a second ligand (par. 50, 57 and 192 teaches the QDs formed from nanosized clusters have a plurality of first ligands, second ligands and a plurality of third ligands) including a second acid functional group different from the first acid functional group (par. 44 teaches the first ligand and the second ligand are, independently or dependently of each other, selected from one or more members of the group consisting of carboxylic acids, metal carboxylate ligands and phosphonic acids); and a third ligand (par. 50, 57 and 192 teaches the QDs formed from nanosized clusters have a plurality of first ligands, second ligands and a plurality of third ligands) including a thiol group (par. 137 teaches surface ligands including thiols such as hexadecane thiol and hexane thiol), a sum of the first ligand and the second ligand contained in the plurality of ligands is in a range of 40% by weight to 45% by weight, based on a total weight of the plurality of ligands (par. 50, 56-57 and 90 teaches first and second ligand % by weight ranges which encompass this range), a content of the third ligand in the plurality of ligands is in a range of 15% by weight to 20% by weight, based on the total weight of the plurality of ligands (par. 50, 56-57 and 90 teaches third ligand % by weight ranges which encompass this range). Regarding claim 2, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein the plurality of ligands further includes a basic ligand including a non-polar functional group (par. 44). Regarding claim 3, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein each of the first acid functional group, the second acid functional group, and the thiol group binds to the surface of the quantum dot (par. 44 and 71). Regarding claim 4, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein the first ligand includes a first main body linked to the first acid functional group, the second ligand includes a second main body linked to the second acid functional group, and the first main body and the second main body are different from each other (par. 44, 50, 57 and 192). Regarding claim 5, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein the third ligand includes a third main body linked to the thiol group (par. 44, 50, 57 and 192). Regarding claim 9, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein the quantum dot includes a core, and a shell surrounding the core, and each of the plurality of ligands binds to a surface of the shell (par. 111-118). Regarding claim 10 Mocatta teaches an quantum dot complex of claim 9, wherein the core includes a first semiconductor nanocrystal, the shell includes a second semiconductor nanocrystal different from the first semiconductor nanocrystal, and the first semiconductor nanocrystal and the second semiconductor nanocrystal are each independently a Group II-VI compound, a Group III-VI compound, a Group I-III-VI compound, a Group III-V compound, a Group III-II-V compound, a Group IV-VI compound, a Group IV element, a Group IV compound, or a combination thereof (par. 111-118). Regarding claim 11, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 9, wherein the core includes InP or AgInGaS (par. 111-118). Regarding claim 12, Mocatta teaches a quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein a molecular weight of each of the plurality of ligands is in a range of 200 to 400 (par. 50, 56-57 and 90 teaches third ligand % by weight ranges which encompass this range). Regarding claim 13, Mocatta teaches an quantum dot complex of claim 1, wherein a content of the first ligand in the plurality of ligands is in a range of 10% by weight to 15% by weight, based on the total weight of the plurality of ligands, and a content of the second ligand in the plurality of ligands is in a range of 25% by weight to 35% by weight, based on the total weight of the plurality of ligands (par. 50, 56-57 and 90 teaches third ligand % by weight ranges which encompass this range). Regarding claim 18, Mocatta teaches a display device comprising: a display panel (par. 183 teaches a display); and a light control layer disposed on the display panel, the light control layer including a plurality of light control areas, wherein at least one of the pluralities of light control areas includes a quantum dot complex (par. 177-179 teaches elements with plurality of light control areas), the quantum dot complex includes: a quantum dot (par. 245 forming nanosized materials to from QDs) and a plurality of ligands binding to a surface of the quantum dot, wherein the plurality of ligands include: a first ligand (par. 50, 57 and 192 teaches the QDs formed from nanosized clusters have a plurality of first ligands, second ligands and a plurality of third ligands) including a first acid functional group (par. 44 teaches the first ligand and the second ligand are, independently or dependently of each other, selected from one or more members of the group consisting of carboxylic acids, metal carboxylate ligands and phosphonic acids); a second ligand (par. 50, 57 and 192 teaches the QDs formed from nanosized clusters have a plurality of first ligands, second ligands and a plurality of third ligands) including a second acid functional group different from the first acid functional group (par. 44 teaches the first ligand and the second ligand are, independently or dependently of each other, selected from one or more members of the group consisting of carboxylic acids, metal carboxylate ligands and phosphonic acids); and a third ligand (par. 50, 57 and 192 teaches the QDs formed from nanosized clusters have a plurality of first ligands, second ligands and a plurality of third ligands) including a thiol group (par. 137 teaches surface ligands including thiols such as hexadecane thiol and hexane thiol), a sum of the first ligand and the second ligand contained in the plurality of ligands is in a range of 40% by weight to 45% by weight, based on a total weight of the plurality of ligands (par. 50, 56-57 and 90 teaches first and second ligand % by weight ranges which encompass this range), a content of the third ligand in the plurality of ligands is in a range of 15% by weight to 20% by weight, based on the total weight of the plurality of ligands (par. 50, 56-57 and 90 teaches third ligand % by weight ranges which encompass this range). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 14 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 20 is objected to due to its dependence on claim 18. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 11, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 13, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604596
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER AND A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604650
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598801
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF PHYSICAL UNCLONABLE FUNCTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588440
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ETCHING USING OXDIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584068
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month