Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/452,556

SILICON-ON-INSULATOR (SOI) STRUCTURES FOR CHARGE DAMAGE PROTECTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 20, 2023
Examiner
LEE, EUGENE
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
737 granted / 900 resolved
+13.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
73.4%
+33.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 900 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, Species II (claims 1-17, and 21-23) in the reply filed on 4/13/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21 thru 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aizawa et al. US 2005/0233517 A1 in view of Zhu et al. US 2012/0168863 A1. Aizawa discloses (see, for example, FIG. 1) a semiconductor structure 100 comprising: a bulk substrate 101; active structure 109, an antenna diode 104 merged in the bulk substrate 101; and an antenna metal structure 131/133/135/119 comprising a metal layer 131/133/135/119 disposed in a multi-layer interconnect (MLI) structure 131/133/135/119 over the bulk substrate 101, the antenna metal structure 131/133/135/119 being electrically connected to the antenna diode 104/107/109 and configured to dissipate charges generated in the MLI structure 131/133/135/119 to the bulk substrate through the antenna diode 104/107/109. In FIG. 2, Aizawa discloses the charges being discharged through the antennal metal structure 104/107/109 to the diffusion layer 107 in the bulk substrate 101. Aizawa does not disclose the active substrate isolated by an insulating layer and a heavily doped layer. However, Zhu discloses (see, for example, Fig. 2) an SOI layer 1011 being isolated by an insulating layer 1012, and a buried semiconductor layer 1013. In paragraph [0055], Zhu discloses the buried semiconductor layer 1013 may be doped as high as 1018 cm-3-1021 cm-3, which is well known as a heavily doped concentration. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at a time prior to the effective filing date, to have the active substrate isolated by an insulating layer and a heavily doped layer in order to protect the active substrate, and suppress short channel effects. Regarding claim 22, see, for example, FIG. 2 wherein Aizawa discloses a topmost metallization layer 119. Regarding claim 23, see, for example, FIG. 2 wherein Aizawa discloses plurality of metal layers 133, 119 that are interconnected by vias 131, 135. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 thru 17 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The references of record, either singularly or in combination, do not teach or suggest at least a semiconductor structure, comprising: a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate merged in the bulk substrate, the SOI substrate further comprising: a heavily doped layer comprising: a bottom portion extending horizontally; and a side portion extending circumferentially from a top end portion to a bottom end portion in a downward direction, wherein the top end portion is connected to the top surface of the bulk substrate, and the bottom end portion is connected to the bottom portion; an insulating layer disposed on and surrounded by the heavily doped layer; and an active substrate disposed on and surrounded by the insulating layer, where the active substrate is isolated by the insulating layer and the heavily doped layer and has a top surface coplanar with the top surface of the bulk substrate. Regarding claims 11-17, the references of record, either singularly or in combination, do not teach or suggest at least a semiconductor structure, comprising: a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate merged in the bulk substrate, the SOI substrate further comprising: a heavily doped layer comprising: a bottom portion extending horizontally; and a side portion extending circumferentially from a top end portion to a bottom end portion in a downward direction, wherein the top end portion is connected to the top surface of the bulk substrate, and the bottom end portion is connected to the bottom portion; an insulating layer disposed on and surrounded by the heavily doped layer; and an active substrate disposed on and surrounded by the insulating layer, where the active substrate is isolated by the insulating layer and the heavily doped layer and has a top surface coplanar with the top surface of the bulk substrate. INFORMATION ON HOW TO CONTACT THE USPTO Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1733. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 730-330 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Eugene Lee April 22, 2026 /EUGENE LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 20, 2023
Application Filed
May 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641833
THIN FILM TRANSISTOR, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND CIRCUIT
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622105
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615858
PHOTODETECTION DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610846
SEMICONDUCTOR ENCAPSULATION METHOD AND SEMICONDUCTOR ENCAPSULATION STRUCTURE
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610786
SEMICONDUCTOR LAYOUT STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR TEST STRUCTURE
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 900 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month