Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/453,082

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Priority
Jan 05, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0001862
Examiner
RAMALLO, GUSTAVO G
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 578 resolved
+27.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
590
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 578 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed on October 5, 2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on August 21, 2023 is being considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Display Device With Reduced Parasitic Capacitance Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1 (Figs. 11, 13, and 15, Claims 1-11 and 13-25) in the reply filed on May 11, 2026 is acknowledged. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “an active layer on the first conductive layer, partially overlapping the lower conductive pattern and the capacitor conductive pattern in the plan view”… must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-11 and 15-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding Claim 1, lines: 6-7 recite the limitation “an active layer on the first conductive layer, partially overlapping the lower conductive pattern and the capacitor conductive pattern in the plan view…” however, active layers DAP1-DAP3 are not shown partially overlapping the lower conductive patterns UCP1-UCP3 and capacitor conductive patterns CCP1-CCP3 in a plan view. DAP1 is shown partially overlapping UCP1 and CCP1 in Fig. 11 but this is a cross-sectional view not a plan view. Regarding Claim 15, lines: 2-3 recite the limitation “a first driving active pattern partially overlapping the first lower conductive pattern and a conductive pattern of a first capacitor in the plan view” however, driving active pattern DAP1-DAP3 are not shown partially overlapping the lower conductive patterns UCP1-UCP3 and conductive pattern of capacitor CCP1-CCP3 in a plan view. DAP1 is shown partially overlapping UCP1 and CCP1 in Fig. 11 but this is a cross-sectional view not a plan view. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 would be allowed if rewritten to overcome the 112 rejection above. Claims 13-14 are allowed (note claims 15-23 would be allowed if rewritten to overcome the 112 rejection above). The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the closest prior art of record, Park (US 2020/0279900), Wang (US 2019/0304373), fail to disclose (by themselves or in combination) the following limitations in combination with the rest of the claim: Regarding Claim 1 (from which claims 2-11 depend), an active layer on the first conductive layer, partially overlapping the lower conductive pattern and the capacitor conductive pattern in the plan view, and including a driving active pattern defining a storage capacitor together with the capacitor conductive pattern; a second conductive layer on the active layer… Regarding Claim 13 (from which claims 14-23 depend), first to third lower conductive patterns on the substrate, located between the driving voltage line and the first data line in a plan view, and spaced apart from each other along the first direction; and first to third conductive patterns on the substrate, located between the driving voltage line and the first data line in the plan view… Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Park (US 2020/0279900) discloses (Fig. 4) a display device with lower conductive pattern 111 and driving gate electrode 155 which is part of capacitor Cst, a second conductive layer 175 and a third conductive layer 191a which may be an anode. Park does not disclose an active layer on and overlapping lower conductive pattern and capacitive conductive pattern. Wang (US 2019/0304373) discloses (Fig. 15) a OLED with two conductive layers T3-1 and S2/T2 on a substrate 110, data line 171, and driving voltage line 172. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GUSTAVO G RAMALLO whose telephone number is (571)272-9227. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Partridge can be reached at (571) 270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GUSTAVO G RAMALLO/Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706146
NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706131
STAIRCASE BRIDGE STRUCTURES FOR WORD LINE CONTACTS IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707638
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICE WITH THROUGH-STACK CONTACT VIA STRUCTURES AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707999
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701707
MEMORY DEVICE CONTAINING TSG DECK AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+2.4%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 578 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month