Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/481,715

METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 05, 2023
Examiner
REAMES, MATTHEW L
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kokusai Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
827 granted / 1076 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1108
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2,4,6-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a1 as being anticipated by Degai (20190371609) cited on ids. a. As to claim 1, Degai teaches A method of processing a substrate, comprising: (a) supplying a second-metal-containing gas, which contains a second metal, to the substrate including a first metal film, which contains a first metal, and an insulating film to form a first film containing the second metal on the first metal film (see claim 1). Claim 1 recites: (a) forming a second metal film on a substrate with a first metal film and an insulating film formed on a surface thereof by alternately supplying a metal-containing gas and a reactive gas onto the substrate Degai further teaches and (b) supplying the second-metal-containing gas to the substrate to form a second film containing the second metal on the first film and the insulating film (see figure 4C shows cycle 1 see also figures 5-10 which show the deposition of multiple W layers). b. As to claims 2 and 4, In the embodiment of figure 10 Degai forms a W nucleus layer (nth cycle of each cycle) and then a bulk tungsten ( the final W deposition step of each cycle). Thus, comparing the final W deposition cycle to the 1 cycle to the 2nd cycle ( nucleus forming step of the second). Thus, the amount of W supplied in greater in the 1 step than the second and in view of figure 10 the time that W is supplied is longer in the first step than the second. Thus, Degai wherein a supply amount of the second-metal-containing gas in (a) is set to be larger than a supply amount of the second-metal-containing gas in (b) and wherein a supply time of the second-metal-containing gas in (a) is set to be larger than a supply time of the second-metal-containing gas in (b). PNG media_image1.png 711 989 media_image1.png Greyscale c. As to claim 6,8,9,10 Degai teaches further comprising: (c) supplying a modifying gas before (b) which is B2H6 see figure 10. B2H6 is Hydrogen with a group 13 element (Boron). d. As to claim 7 Degai teaches wherein in (a) and (b), a reducing gas is supplied, and the modifying gas is a compound different from the reducing gas (paragraph 34 both B2H6 and H2 can be supplied) B2H6 is the modifying gas H2 is the reducing gas). e. As to claim 11, Degai teaches the first metal is Ti paragraph 59 and the second metal is W (see figure 10 W deposition). f. As to claim 12, Degai teaches wherein (a) includes: (a1) supplying the second-metal-containing gas to the substrate; and (a2) supplying a first reducing gas to the substrate (each cycle comprises flowing B2H6 then WF6) since the steps are arbitrary any cycle that supplies both can be treated as step a). g. As to claim 13 Degai teaches wherein (b) includes: (b1) supplying the second-metal-containing gas to the substrate; and (b2) supplying a second reducing gas to the substrate (each cycle comprises flowing B2H6 then WF6) since the steps are arbitrary any cycle that supplies both can be treated as step b). h. As to claim 14, Degai teaches A method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising the method of Claim 1 (paragraph 3 MOSFET comprise semiconductor materials). i. As to claim 15, A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing a program that cause, by a computer, a substrate processing apparatus to perform a process comprising (paragraph 2): (a) supplying a second-metal-containing gas, which contains a second metal, to the substrate including a first metal film, which contains a first metal, and an insulating film to form a first film containing the second metal on the first metal film (see claim 1). Claim 1 recites: (a) forming a second metal film on a substrate with a first metal film and an insulating film formed on a surface thereof by alternately supplying a metal-containing gas and a reactive gas onto the substrate Degai further teaches and (b) supplying the second-metal-containing gas to the substrate to form a second film containing the second metal on the first film and the insulating film (see figure 4C shows cycle 1 see also figures 5-10 which show the deposition of multiple W layers). j. As to claim 16, Degai teaches A substrate processing apparatus, comprising: a gas supply system (paragraph 39) configured to supply: (a) supplying a second-metal-containing gas, which contains a second metal, to the substrate including a first metal film, which contains a first metal, and an insulating film to form a first film containing the second metal on the first metal film (see claim 1). Claim 1 recites: (a) forming a second metal film on a substrate with a first metal film and an insulating film formed on a surface thereof by alternately supplying a metal-containing gas and a reactive gas onto the substrate Degai further teaches and (b) supplying the second-metal-containing gas to the substrate to form a second film containing the second metal on the first film and the insulating film (see figure 4C shows cycle 1 see also figures 5-10 which show the deposition of multiple W layers). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Degai. Degai paragraph 138 states in reference to figure 10: In the H.sub.2 gas and WF.sub.6 gas supplying step, the APC valve 243 is appropriately controlled to adjust the inner pressure of the process chamber 201 to a predetermined pressure. For example, the predetermined pressure of the process chamber 201 may range from 10 Pa to 3,990 Pa. The flow rate of the H.sub.2 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 is adjusted by the MFC 312 to a predetermined flow rate. For example, the predetermined flow rate of the H.sub.2 gas may range from 100 sccm to 20,000 sccm. The flow rate of the WF.sub.6 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 is adjusted by the MFC 322 to a predetermined flow rate. For example, the predetermined flow rate of the WF.sub.6 gas may range from 10 sccm to 1,000 sccm. The flow rates of the N.sub.2 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 are adjusted by the MFCs 512, 522, 532 and 542 to predetermined flow rates, respectively. For example, the predetermined flow rates of the N.sub.2 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 may range from 10 sccm to 10,000 sccm, respectively. For example, the time duration of supplying the H.sub.2 gas and the WF.sub.6 gas onto the wafer 200 (that is, the gas supply time or the irradiation time), may be set to a predetermined time ranging from 1 second to 1,000 seconds. The temperature of the heater 207 is adjusted such that the temperature of the wafer 200 may become a predetermined temperature. For example, the predetermined temperature of the wafer 200 may range from 100° C. to 600° C. In the H.sub.2 gas and WF.sub.6 gas supplying step, only the H.sub.2 gas and the WF.sub.6 gas are supplied into the process chamber 201. By supplying the WF.sub.6 gas into the process chamber 201, a tungsten bulk layer having a thickness of, for example, from 10 nm to 30 nm, is formed on the tungsten nucleus layer on the wafer 200. Degai does not explicitly teach wherein a supply flow rate of the second-metal-containing gas in (a) is set to be larger than a supply flow rate of the second-metal-containing gas in (b). The claim does not limit which is the first step and second step in the cycle. To optimize growth the W films properties sometimes the flow rate will be greater for example if one desired a fast deposition of the Bulk W in figure 10. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to optimized the W supply rate during Bulk W deposition in figure 10 to be larger than the nucleus flow rate for the desired growth rate a while maintaining good film quality and faster through put. PNG media_image2.png 711 989 media_image2.png Greyscale As to claim 5, Degai paragraph 138 states in reference to figure 10: : In the H.sub.2 gas and WF.sub.6 gas supplying step, the APC valve 243 is appropriately controlled to adjust the inner pressure of the process chamber 201 to a predetermined pressure. For example, the predetermined pressure of the process chamber 201 may range from 10 Pa to 3,990 Pa. The flow rate of the H.sub.2 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 is adjusted by the MFC 312 to a predetermined flow rate. For example, the predetermined flow rate of the H.sub.2 gas may range from 100 sccm to 20,000 sccm. The flow rate of the WF.sub.6 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 is adjusted by the MFC 322 to a predetermined flow rate. For example, the predetermined flow rate of the WF.sub.6 gas may range from 10 sccm to 1,000 sccm. The flow rates of the N.sub.2 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 are adjusted by the MFCs 512, 522, 532 and 542 to predetermined flow rates, respectively. For example, the predetermined flow rates of the N.sub.2 gas supplied into the process chamber 201 may range from 10 sccm to 10,000 sccm, respectively. For example, the time duration of supplying the H.sub.2 gas and the WF.sub.6 gas onto the wafer 200 (that is, the gas supply time or the irradiation time), may be set to a predetermined time ranging from 1 second to 1,000 seconds. The temperature of the heater 207 is adjusted such that the temperature of the wafer 200 may become a predetermined temperature. For example, the predetermined temperature of the wafer 200 may range from 100° C. to 600° C. In the H.sub.2 gas and WF.sub.6 gas supplying step, only the H.sub.2 gas and the WF.sub.6 gas are supplied into the process chamber 201. By supplying the WF.sub.6 gas into the process chamber 201, a tungsten bulk layer having a thickness of, for example, from 10 nm to 30 nm, is formed on the tungsten nucleus layer on the wafer 200. Degai does not explicitly teach wherein a pressure in a space in which the substrate exists in (a) is set to be larger than a pressure in the space in which the substrate exists in (b). Further it was known to use low pressure deposition of W for high quality W films and high pressure for faster deposition rates. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing for the Bulk Deposition step to increase the pressure for faster deposition rates while the nucleus layers are formed at low pressure for good quality films. PNG media_image3.png 711 989 media_image3.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW L REAMES whose telephone number is (571)272-2408. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:00 am-4:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William F. Kraig can be reached at 571-272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW L. REAMES/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2896 /MATTHEW L REAMES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604593
LED Structure, LED Device and Method of Manufacturing LED Structure
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598934
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING STRUCTURE HAVING MULTI METAL LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593620
TECHNOLOGIES FOR SCALABLE SPIN QUBIT READOUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588299
SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT RECEPTION ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588191
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month