Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/492,240

PROCESSING METHOD OF BONDED WAFER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 23, 2023
Priority
Oct 28, 2022 — JP 2022-173157
Examiner
MILLER, ALEXANDER MICHAEL
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
DISCO Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
6 granted / 7 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
92.6%
+52.6% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 7 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim and Specification Status The Examiner acknowledges the amendments to claim 1 in the Applicant’s response dated 4 March 2026. The claim amendments have been addressed below. The Examiner acknowledges the addition of new claim 3 in the Applicant’s response dated 4 March 2026. The new claim has been addressed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xin Lu et al. (US 2020/0168451 A1; hereinafter “Lu”) in view of Masaru Nakamura (US 2022/0172952 A1; hereinafter “Nakamura”) in further view of Katsuhiro Korematsu (US 2023/0150067 A1; hereinafter “Korematsu”). Regarding Claim 1, Lu teaches a processing method of a bonded wafer formed through bonding (para [0061] describes a process of bonding a wafer), by a joining layer (T1, Fig. 10, para [0061] describes a bonding agent T1 which acts as a joining layer), a front surface (Wa, Fig. 10, para [0061] describes a front face of a wafer W) of a first wafer (W, Fig. 10, para [0061] describes a first wafer W) and a front surface or a back surface of a second wafer (T2, Fig. 10, para [0061] describes wherein the first wafer W is bonded to a second wafer T2 wherein the bonding will occur at a front surface of second wafer T2) , the first wafer having, on the front surface thereof, a device region in which a plurality of devices are formed (D and Wa1, Fig. 10, para [0024] describes a device region Wa1 comprising devices D formed on a front surface Wa of wafer W) and an outer circumferential surplus region that surrounds the device region (Wa2, Fig. 10, para [0024] describes an outer circumferential surplus region Wa2 surrounding the device region) and that includes a chamfered part formed at an outer circumferential edge thereof (Fig. 10, para [0024] describes wherein wafer W is chamfered at an outer circumferential edge Wd), the processing method comprising: a focal point setting step of causing a laser beam with a wavelength having transmissibility with respect to the first wafer (para [0038] describes a laser beam of a transmission wavelength to the first wafer W) to branch into a plurality of branch laser beams (para [0037] describes wherein said laser beams are branched into laser beams of different light paths by a beam splitter or the like) and setting focal points of the respective branch laser beams at different positions (para [0037] and para [0038] describes setting different positions of the focal point of said pulse laser beam); a modified layer forming step of forming a plurality of modified layers in a form of rings inside the first wafer (M1, Fig. 3, para [0035] describes forming a modified layer M1 which formed an annular modified region M) through holding a side of the second wafer by a first chuck table (10, Fig. 4, para [0026] describes a holding table which holds the wafer thereon), positioning the focal points of the branch laser beams inside the first wafer on an inner side in a radial direction relative to the chamfered part from a back surface of the first wafer (M, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, para [0035] describes positioning the focal point of the laser that is inside the first wafer W on an inner side in a radial direction relative to the chamfered part from a back surface Wb of the first wafer as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4), and executing irradiation with the branch laser beams (para [0035] describes irradiating the laser beam upon the wafer W); and a grinding step of holding the side of the second wafer by a second chuck table (75, Fig. 10, para [0063] describes a chuck table 75 of a grinding apparatus 7) and grinding the back surface of the first wafer to thin the first wafer (71, Fig. 10 and Fig. 11, para [0063] and para [0064] describes a grinding means which performs grinding on the back surface Wb of the first wafer in the -Z direction resulting in a thinned wafer), after the modified layer forming step is executed (Fig. 10, para [0061] depicts a grinding step wherein para [0061] describes annular modified region formation step has already been carried out before said grinding step), wherein, Lu fails to explicitly disclose a coordinate generation step of detecting an outermost circumference of the joining layer and generating coordinates of the outermost circumference of the joining layer. However, Lu describes a coordinate generation step of detecting an outermost circumference of the joining layer (140 Fig. 2, para [0030] describes a camera 140 which is used to detect an outermost circumference of the wafer W wherein para [0061] describes joining layer T1 as joining wafer W and wafer T2 wherein wafer W and wafer T2 have a same circumference such that a resulting joining layer would therefore comprise a same circumference as shown in Fig. 10 wherein detecting an outermost circumference of wafer W would also detect an outermost circumference of joining layer T1) and generating coordinates of the outermost circumference of the joining layer (para [0030] describes generating coordinates of the outermost circumference of the wafer W wherein para [0061] describes joining layer T1 as joining wafer W and wafer T2 further wherein wafer W and wafer T2 have a same circumference such that a resulting joining layer would therefore comprise a same circumference as shown in Fig. 10 wherein generating coordinates of an outermost circumference of wafer W would also generate coordinates of an outermost circumference of joining layer T1); Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have used the coordination generation step of Lu to try generating coordinates of an outermost circumference of a joining layer instead of a wafer layer as there are a finite number of wafer and joining layers available to generate coordinates for measurement and it would provide the well-known advantage of ensuring that there is no overhang of a joining layer beyond the two wafers which could result in undesirable effects further down the manufacturing process. Lu further fails to explicitly disclose in the modified layer forming step, the focal points of the branch laser beams are formed in a form of descending stairs in such a manner as to get closer to the joining layer in a direction from the inner side toward an outer side in the radial direction of the first wafer, a crack that extends from the modified layer formed by a lowermost one of the focal points reaches the coordinates of the outermost circumference of the joining layer generated in the coordinate generation step. However, Nakamura teaches a similar processing method of a bonded wafer, wherein in the modified layer forming step (1003, Fig. 7, para [0034] describes a laser processing step 1003 of forming annular modified layers 13), the focal points of the branch laser beams are formed in a form of descending stairs (13, Fig. 7, para [0035] describes wherein the laser processing machine 30 sets the focal point at a plurality of different heights in the thickness direction resulting in annular layers 13 which have a greater length 131 in a thickness direction of a wafer as they are located closer to the outer peripheral edge of the wafer further wherein upon combining the laser process of Lu the laser beams would be branch laser beams) in such a manner as to get closer to the joining layer in a direction from the inner side toward an outer side in the radial direction of the first wafer (13, Fig. 7, para [0035] describes wherein a thickness 131 of the annular modified layers is greater at a location closer to the outer side wherein an annular modified layer 13 is closest to an adhesive layer of protective member 12), a crack that extends from the modified layer formed by a lowermost one of the focal points reaches the coordinates of the outermost circumference of the joining layer generated in the coordinate generation step (para [0032] and para [0042] describes wherein annular modified layers 13 may each be a cracked region that form a fracture in the annular modified layers). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lu with Nakamura to further disclose a processing method of a bonded wafer comprising focal points of laser beams in a form of descending stairs in order to provide the advantage of providing fracture points so that fragments remaining after a grinding process may be subdivided enabling ease of removal and further allowing the off-cuts of a wafer to be selectively removed during a grinding process (Nakamura, para [0031] and para [0043]). The combination of Lu and Nakamura fails to explicitly disclose simultaneously forming a plurality of modified layers in a form of rings inside the first wafer through holding a side of the second wafer by a first chuck table; and wherein the focal points of the branch laser beams are formed simultaneously in a form of descending stairs in such a manner as to get closer to the joining layer in a direction from the inner side toward an outer side in the radial direction of the first wafer. However, Korematsu teaches a similar processing method, comprising simultaneously forming a plurality of modified layers in a form of rings inside the first wafer through holding a side of the second wafer by a first chuck table (121 and 122, Fig. 2, para [0049] and para [0049] describes forming a plurality of modified layers 121 and 122 inside a wafer 11 simultaneously with two branched lasers L1 and L2 wherein a second side of the wafer 11a is held by a support portion stage 2 further wherein upon combining Lu and Nakamura with Korematsu, the modified layers 12 of Korematsu would be in an annular shape M1 and M as disclosed by Lu); and wherein the focal points of the branch laser beams are formed simultaneously in a form of descending stairs in such a manner as to get closer to the joining layer in a direction from the inner side toward an outer side in the radial direction of the first wafer (C1 and C2, L1 and L2, Fig. 2, para [0047] describes focal points C1 and C2 of branched laser beams L1 and L2 being formed simultaneously in a form of descending stairs as shown by the distance Dx and Dz in Fig. 2 wherein the descending stair focal points C1 and C2 are formed in such a manner as to gradually get closer to a lowest surface 11a of a wafer 11 wherein upon combining Lu and Nakamura with Korematsu, the lowest surface of the wafer 11 would be at a side closest to the joining layer T1 of Lu in a direction from an inner side toward an outer side of the bonded wafer as described by Nakamura at the outer circumference detected by the camera 140 of Lu).). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lu and Nakamura with Korematsu to further disclose a processing method of a bonded wafer comprising simultaneously forming modified layers using branched lasers with focal points in a descending stair pattern in order to provide the advantage of providing a laser process which may have a plurality of laser beams with a plurality of focal points, improving processing speed and suppressing deterioration processing quality (Korematsu, para [0111] and para [0022]). Regarding Claim 2, the combination of Lu, Nakamura and Korematsu teach the processing method according to claim 1, wherein, in the grinding step, the modified layers are removed due to the grinding of the back surface of the first wafer (Lu, para [0051] describes grinding to a finish thickness L1 removing the modified layer M1 and annular modified region M), and the chamfered part is removed from the first wafer due to the cracks (Lu, N, Fig. 10, para [0043] described modified region N of chamfered portion Wd including cracks wherein para [0053] describes wherein outer circumferential portion including modified regions N can be removed during grinding). Regarding Claim 3, the combination of Lu, Nakamura and Korematsu disclose the processing method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of focal points of the branch laser beams (Korematsu, C1 and C2, L1 and L2, Fig. 2, para [0047] describes focal points C1 and C2 of branched laser beams L1 and L2 being formed simultaneously in a form of descending stairs as shown by the distance Dx and Dz in Fig. 2) are formed in such a manner as to gradually get closer to the joining layer in a direction from an inner side toward an outer side of the bonded wafer at the outer circumference of the bonded wafer (Korematsu, C1 and C2, Fig. 2 depicts wherein the focal points C1 and C2 of the branched laser beams L1 and L2 are formed in such a manner as to gradually get closer to a lowest surface 11a of a wafer 11 wherein upon combining Lu and Nakamura with Korematsu, the lowest surface of the wafer 11 would be at a side closest to the joining layer T1 of Lu in a direction from an inner side toward an outer side of the bonded wafer as described by Nakamura at the outer circumference detected by the camera 140 of Lu). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-3 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new grounds of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER M MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-6051. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571(272)-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER MICHAEL MILLER/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 /JULIO J MALDONADO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 25, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672434
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660243
METHOD FOR FORMING AN ISLOLATION REGION IN A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12593660
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 3 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.3%)
3y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 7 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month