Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/496,941

RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Priority
Sep 28, 2023 — TW 112137351
Examiner
WOLDEGEORGIS, ERMIAS T
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
United Microelectronics Corp.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
540 granted / 761 resolved
+3.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
70.9%
+30.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 761 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 6-11 have been cancelled; claim 1 has been amended; and claims 1-5 are currently pending. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US 2016/00278899 A1, hereinafter “Kim”) in view of Huang et al. (US 2012/0289040 A1, hereinafter “Huang”). In regards to claim 1, Kim discloses (See, for example, Fig. 11-14) a method for fabricating a radio-frequency (RF) device, comprising: providing a substrate (202) having a core region (204) and a non-core region (206); forming a shallow trench isolation (STI) (208L, See annotated Fig. 13 included below) in the substrate (202) between the core region (204) and the non-core region (206); removing (See, for example, Par [0069], Fig. 13) the first gate oxide layer (210) on the core region (204); wherein after removing (See, for example, annotated Fig. 13 included below) the first gate oxide layer (210) on the core region (204), a part (Shown as 208c, See annotated Fig. 13 included below) of the shallow trench isolation (208L, See annotated Fig. 13 included below) is still covered by the first gate oxide layer (210), and another part (208e, See annotated Fig. 13 included below) of the shallow trench isolation (208L) is exposed. Kim is silent about forming a first gate oxide layer on the core region and the non-core region; forming a patterned mask on the non-core region and the STI; forming a second gate oxide layer on the core region. Huang while disclosing a semiconductor structure teaches (See, for example, Figs. 2-) forming a first gate oxide layer (203) on the core region (210) and the non-core region (220); forming a patterned mask on the non-core region and the STI (See, for example, Par [0015], and Fig. 4); removing (See, Par [0015] and Fig. 4) the first gate oxide layer (203) on the core region (210); and forming a second gate oxide layer (204) on the core region (210). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Kim by Huang because having the method of Huang enhances device performance by improving the control over the surface roughness of the first dielectric layer in the non-core region by preventing damage of the first gate oxide layer in the non-core region during its removal from the core region. PNG media_image1.png 498 700 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 2, Kim as modified above discloses (See, for example, Figs. 12-13, Kim) removing (See, Fig. 13) the first gate oxide layer (210) on the core region (204, Fig. 13) and part of the first gate oxide layer (210, Fig. 13) on the STI (208, Fig. 13); forming the second gate oxide layer (220/222, Fig. 14) on the core region (204); and forming a gate material layer (270, 230, See Par [0072] and Fig. 15) on the first gate oxide layer (262) and the second gate oxide layer (220/222). In regards to claim 3, Kim as modified above discloses (See, for example, Fig. 15, Kim) the gate material layer comprises polysilicon (See, for example, Par [0072]). In regards to claim 4, Kim as modified above discloses (See, for example, Fig. 16) a thickness of the second gate oxide layer (220/222) is less than a thickness of the first gate oxide layer (262). In regards to claim 5, Kim as modified above discloses (See, for example, Fig. 2, Huang) the substrate (201) comprises a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (See, for example, Par [0010]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the new amendment in claim 1 has been considered and are addressed in the rejection stated above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERMIAS T WOLDEGEORGIS whose telephone number is (571)270-5350. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8 am - 5 pm E.S.T.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached on 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERMIAS T WOLDEGEORGIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 02, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696635
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696652
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677599
METHOD OF FABRICATING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660667
HYBRID BONDING APPARATUS AND HYBRID BONDING METHOD USING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655031
COMPOSITE ELECTRON TRANSPORT MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 761 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month