Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/500,933

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Examiner
JAHAN, BILKIS
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
788 granted / 892 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 892 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Attorney Docket Number: 102351-2158-01727/US13821 Filling Date: 11/02/23 Inventor: Ho et al Examiner: Bilkis Jahan DETAILED ACTION In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-8, 11-12, 14, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dang et al (US 2016/0336638 A1). Regarding claim 1, Dang discloses an electronic device (Fig. 10), comprising: a first electronic component 1010 (Para. 62); a second electronic component 1020 (Para. 62); an interconnection structure 1040 (Paras. 62, 63) below the first electronic component 1010 and the second electronic component 1020, and electrically connecting the first electronic component 1010 to the second electronic component 1020; and a first waveguide 1040 (Paras. 62, 63) below the first electronic component 1010 and the second electronic component 1020, and configured to transmit electromagnetic waves (functional). Regarding claim 2, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the first waveguide 1040 is configured to transmit signals between the second electronic component 1020 and an antenna 1030 (Paras. 62, 63). Regarding claim 3, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the first electronic component 1010 is configured to modulate a signal from the second electronic component 1020. Regarding claim 5, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the second electronic component includes a power amplify element 1020 (RFIC). Regarding claim 6, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the first waveguide 1040 includes a plurality of conductive structures 1040 (conductive structures connected between 1030 and 1010/1020). Regarding claim 7, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 6, wherein the plurality of conductive structures include conductive pillars separated from each other (conductive structures connected between 1030 and 1010/1020). Regarding claim 8, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 6, wherein the plurality of conductive structures 1040 (two conductive wires connected to 1010 and 1020) are configured to define a channel for transmitting the electromagnetic waves (any conductive structure passes electromagnetic waves). Regarding claim 11, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 6, wherein a first part of the plurality of conductive structures defines a filter 1040 (left connection structure filter signals from antenna). Regarding claim 12, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 6, wherein a second part of the plurality of conductive structures defines a divider 1040 (right connection structure drives signals from antenna). Regarding claim 14, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 10, wherein the first conductive layer 1040 (left connection structure filter signals from antenna) defines a first antenna 1030 (Paras. 62, 63) electrically coupled to the first waveguide 1040. Regarding claim 18, Dang discloses an electronic device (Fig. 10), comprising: a baseband chip 1010 (Para. 62, claim does not specify baseband chip); a RFIC 1020 (Para. 62) adjacent to the baseband chip 1010; and a waveguide 1040 (Paras. 62, 63) disposed below the baseband chip 1010 and the RFIC 1020, wherein the waveguide 1040 defines an antenna 1030 electrically connected to the RFIC 1020. Regarding claim 19, Dang discloses the electronic device of claim 18, wherein at least a portion of the baseband chip or the RFIC 1020 overlaps the waveguide 1040. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dang et al (US 2016/0336638 A1) in view of Rofougaran (US 2014/0154999 A1, Rofo hereinafter). Regarding claim 4, Dang does not explicitly disclose the electronic device of claim 3, wherein the first electronic component is configured to convert the signal from an analog signal to a digital signal. However, Rofo discloses the first electronic component is configured to convert the signal from an analog signal to a digital signal 112, 505 (Figs. 1, 5, Paras. 17, 44). Rofo teaches the above modification is used to convert analog signal to digital signal (Paras. 17, 44). It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill of the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to substitute Dang first electronic component with Rofo electronic component as suggested above to convert analog signal to digital signal (Paras. 17, 44). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-10, 13, 15 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 16 and 17 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The applied prior arts neither anticipate nor render the claimed subject matter obvious because they fail to teach the claimed electronic device, comprising: a bridge die below the baseband die and the RFIC, and electrically connecting a portion of output terminals of the baseband die with a portion of output terminals of the RFIC in combination with all other limitations as recited in claim 16. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BILKIS JAHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5022. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am-5 Pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon T Fletcher can be reached at (571)272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BILKIS . JAHAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2817 /BILKIS JAHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604563
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND LIGHT EMITTING MODULE HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604588
LIGHT EMITTING ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF TRANSFER PRINTING A MICRO-LED
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598842
Light Emitting Display Panel
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581834
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581772
STRAIN BALANCED DIRECT BANDGAP ALUMINUM INDIUM PHOSPHIDE QUANTUM WELLS FOR LIGHT EMITTING DIODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 892 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month