Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/504,398

SEMICONDUCTOR FABRICATION PROCESSES FOR DEFECT REDUCTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Examiner
PATEL, REEMA
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
971 granted / 1097 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1135
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1097 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (encompassing claims 1-16 and newly added 21-24) in the reply filed on 1/5/26 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 11/8/23 and 1/9/25. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 4 and 15 recite the term “about”. The term "about" is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite; it is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. “About” is defined as "almost or nearly—used to indicate that a number, amount, time, etc., is not exact or certain” (see Merriam Webster online dictionary). The term “about” modifies a target, and implicitly requires boundaries at some maximum value above the target and at some minimum value below the target beyond which one is not “about” the target any more. Neither the claims, nor the specification, defines these boundaries. Thus, it is unclear whether one must be within some small percentage of deviation of the target (such as 0.01 %, 0.1 %, 1 %, 2 %, 5 %, 10 %, or some other percentage) or within a certain number of units of the target and specifically which of these possible values defines the boundaries. If one were to poll 100 people having ordinary skill in the art, there would be many different responses for the boundaries. Thus, determining whether one is infringing the limitation is subjective, rather than objective, and thus the claim is unclear. Therefore, the claims are rejected as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant, regards as the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5-14, 16, and 21-24 are allowed. Claim 1 contains allowable subject matter because of selectively forming a first source/drain feature over the first source/drain recess while the second source/drain recess is covered by a mask layer; removing the mask layer; depositing a first interlayer dielectric layer over the first source/drain feature and the second source/drain recess; removing the first dummy gate stack and the second dummy gate stack; releasing the plurality of channel layers in the channel region of the first fin- shaped structure and the channel region of the second fin-shaped structure to form first channel members in the first region and second channel members in the second region; forming a first gate structure to wrap around each of the first channel members and a second gate structure to wrap around each of the second channel members; after the forming of the first gate structure and the second gate structure, forming an access opening over the second source/drain recess; and forming a second source/drain feature over the access opening in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 2-3 and 5-9 depend on claim 1. Claim 10 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation of selectively forming a first source/drain feature over the first isolation layer; forming a contact etch stop layer (CESL) over the first source/drain feature and the second isolation layer; forming a first interlayer dielectric (ILD) layer over the CESL; forming an access opening through the first ILD layer, the CESL, and second isolation layer to expose the second bottom epitaxial layer; and, forming a second source/drain feature over the exposed second bottom epitaxial layer in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 11-14 and 16 depend on claim 10. Claim 21 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation of depositing a first interlayer dielectric layer over the first source/drain feature and the second source/drain recess; removing the dummy gate stack; forming a first gate structure over the channel region of the first active region and a second gate structure over the channel region of the second active region; after the forming of the first gate structure and the second gate structure, forming an access opening over the second source/drain recess; and forming a second source/drain feature over the second source/drain recess through the access opening in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 22-24 depend on claim 21. The closest prior art is More (U.S. 2023/0395721 A1). More discloses a method, comprising: receiving a workpiece comprising: a substrate (202, Fig. 2), a first base fin (204-1, Fig. 2) and a second base fin (204-2, Fig. 2) over the substrate, and an isolation feature (206, Fig. 2) disposed over the substrate and between the first base fin and the second base fin; forming a first bottom epitaxial layer (CE1 of 220-1, Fig. 4) over the first base fin and a second bottom epitaxial layer (CE1 of 220-2, Fig. 4) over the second base fin; forming a first isolation layer (PE1 of 220-1, Fig. 4) over the first bottom epitaxial layer and a second isolation layer (PE1 of 220-2, Fig. 4) over the second bottom epitaxial layer. Yet, More does not disclose selectively forming a first source/drain feature over the first isolation layer; forming a contact etch stop layer (CESL) over the first source/drain feature and the second isolation layer; forming a first interlayer dielectric (ILD) layer over the CESL; forming an access opening through the first ILD layer, the CESL, and second isolation layer to expose the second bottom epitaxial layer; forming a second source/drain feature over the exposed second bottom epitaxial layer; and forming a second ILD layer over the second source/drain feature and these features are not rendered obvious by the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REEMA PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1436. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REEMA PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 3/31/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599042
CARRIER STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598937
EPITAXIAL FORMATION WITH TREATMENT AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES RESULTING THEREFROM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598976
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593489
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE INCLUDING GATE SPACER LAYER AND DIELECTRIC LAYER HAVING PORTION LOWER THAN TOP SURFACE OF GATE SPACER LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588245
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FOR FORMING SOURCE/DRAIN CONTACT FEATURES AND DEVICES MANUFACTURED THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1097 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month