Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/517,250

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 22, 2023
Examiner
LINDSEY, COLE LEON
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
103 granted / 116 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
150
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 116 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US20180277040A1, hereinafter Lee). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a display device comprising: a substrate including a light emitting area and a non-light emitting area surrounding the light emitting area (Figs. 1B/2 substrate 110 has display areas DA and peripheral areas PA surrounding display areas DA); a conductive line disposed on the substrate to pass through the light emitting area in a plan view, wherein the conductive line includes an overlapping portion overlapping the light emitting area (Figs. 1B/2 conductive member 160 disposed on substrate 110 and passes through display area DA in a plan view and has a portion that overlaps display area DA); and a pixel electrode disposed on the conductive line and at least partially overlapping the overlapping portion of the conductive line (Fig. 2 first electrode 172 disposed on conductive member 160 and first electrode 172 overlaps conductive member 160 in outer light emitting area OA), and wherein the overlapping portion of the conductive line includes: a body part having a polygonal planar shape and having an area smaller than an area of the light emitting area in the plan view (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 has inner portion with square shape and an area smaller than display area DA); a first protrusion part protruding in a first direction from the body part to a boundary between the light emitting area and the non-light emitting area in the plan view (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 has left portion of first extension portion 162 that extends from inner portion of conductive member 160 through the peripheral area PA); and a second protrusion part protruding in a second direction opposite to the first direction from the body part to the boundary between the light emitting area and the non- light emitting area in the plan view (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 has right portion of first extension portion 162 that extends from inner portion of conductive member 160 through the peripheral area PA). Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the first protrusion part and the second protrusion part be opposite to each other with a center point of the body part therebetween (Fig. 1B left portion of first extension portion 162 is opposite right portion of first extension portion 162 with conductive member 160 between them). Regarding claim 3, Lee discloses the display device of claim 2, wherein the overlapping portion of the conductive line is point symmetric with respect to the center point of the body part (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 is point symmetric with respect to the center point of display area DA). Regarding claim 4, Lee discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the pixel electrode overlaps an edge of the body part in the plan view (Figs. 1B/2 first electrode 172 overlaps an edge of conductive member 160 in plan view), and a portion of an upper surface of the pixel electrode adjacent to an edge of the body part, from which the first protrusion part protrudes, and a portion of the upper surface of the pixel electrode adjacent to an edge of the body part, from which the second protrusion part protrudes, are substantially flat (Figs. 1B/2 a portion of an upper surface of first electrode adjacent to conductive member 160 near right portion of first extension portions 162 and a portion of an upper surface of first electrode adjacent to conductive member 160 near left portion of first extension portions 162 are both substantially flat). Regarding claim 5, Lee discloses the display device of claim 4, wherein a portion of the upper surface of the pixel electrode adjacent to an edge of the body part, where the first protrusion part and the second protrusion part do not protrude, has a stepped structure (Fig. 2 first electrode 172 has a stepped structure in the outer area of display area OA). Regarding claim 6, Lee discloses the display device of claim 1, further comprising: a first via insulating layer and a second via insulating layer, which are disposed between the substrate and the pixel electrode (Fig. 9 insulation layers 150 and 165 are disposed between substrate 110 and lower electrode 172); and a lower conductive layer disposed between the substrate and the first via insulating layer (Fig. 9 electrode 141), and wherein the conductive line is disposed between the first via insulating layer and the second via insulating layer (Fig. 9 conductive member 160 disposed between insulation layers 150 and 165), and is electrically connected to the pixel electrode through a contact hole defined in the second via insulating layer (Fig. 9 conductive member and all the other pixel elements electrically connected through vias defined in both insulation layers 165 and 150). Regarding claim 7, Lee discloses the display device of claim 6, wherein the conductive line is electrically connected to the lower conductive layer through a contact hole defined in the first via insulating layer (Fig. 9 conductive member 160 connected to electrode 141 through a via defined in insulation layer 150). Regarding claim 8, Lee discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the conductive line includes: a data line which transmits a data voltage (Par. 21 “the first conductive member may include a data line pattern which transmits a data voltage”); a power supply voltage line which transmits a power supply voltage (Par. 21 “the first conductive member may include…a driving voltage line pattern which transmits a driving voltage”); and an initialization voltage line which transmits an initialization voltage (Par. 21 “the first conductive member may include…a contact pattern electrically connected to the thin film transistors, the data line pattern, and the driving voltage line pattern”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US20180277040A1) in view of Choi (US20200365665A1). Regarding claim 9, Lee teaches the display device of claim 1, further comprising: a light emitting layer disposed on the pixel electrode (Fig. 2 light emitting layer 174); a common electrode disposed on the light emitting layer (Fig. 2 second electrode 176). Lee does not appear to teach a polarization layer disposed on the common electrode. Choi teaches a polarization layer disposed on the common electrode (Par. 131 “Components such as …a polarizer…may be further arranged on the sealing member”). Being in analogous arts, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee with the teachings of Choi because the inclusion of a polarizer minimizes reflection effects (Choi par. 131). Claims 10-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US20180277040A1) in view of Kim et al. (US20220123080A1, hereinafter Kim). Regarding claim 10, Lee teaches a display device comprising: a substrate including a light emitting area and a non-light emitting area surrounding the light emitting area (Figs. 1B/2 substrate 110 has display areas DA and peripheral areas PA surrounding display areas DA); a conductive line disposed on the substrate to pass through the light emitting area in a plan view, wherein the conductive line includes an overlapping portion overlapping the light emitting area (Figs. 1B/2 conductive member 160 disposed on substrate 110 and passes through display area DA in a plan view and has a portion that overlaps display area DA); and a pixel electrode disposed on the conductive line and at least partially overlapping the overlapping portion of the conductive line (Fig. 2 first electrode 172 disposed on conductive member 160 and first electrode 172 overlaps conductive member 160 in outer light emitting area OA), and wherein the overlapping portion of the conductive line includes: a body part having a polygonal planar shape and having an area smaller than an area of the light emitting area in the plan view (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 has inner portion with square shape and an area smaller than display area DA); a first protrusion part protruding in a first direction from a first edge of the body part to a boundary between the light emitting area and the non-light emitting area in the plan view (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 has left portion of first extension portion 162 that extends from inner portion of conductive member 160 through the peripheral area PA); and a second protrusion part protruding in a second direction opposite to the first direction from a second edge of the body part to the boundary between the light emitting area and the non-light emitting area in the plan view (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 has right portion of first extension portion 162 that extends from inner portion of conductive member 160 through the peripheral area PA). Lee does not appear to teach a body part having an octagonal planar shape. Kim teaches a body part having an octagonal planar shape (Fig. 1 first pixel electrodes 400R/400G/400B with octagonal planar shapes). Being in analogous arts, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee with the teachings of Kim because as both Lee and Kim teach suitable shapes for pixel electrodes, it would have been obvious to substitute Lee’s square conductive members 160 with Kim’s octagonal electrodes to achieve the predictable result of forming conductive member 160 in the shape of an octagon. Regarding claim 11, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 10, wherein the first edge and the second edge are opposite to each other with a center point of the body part therebetween (Fig. 1B left portion of first extension portion 162 is opposite right portion of first extension portion 162 with conductive member 160 between them). Regarding claim 12, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 11, wherein the overlapping portion of the conductive line is point symmetric with respect to the center point of the body part (Fig. 1B conductive member 160 is point symmetric with respect to the center point of display area DA and so any modifications to shape would maintain that property). Regarding claim 13, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 11, wherein the body part includes: a third edge located in a third direction perpendicular to both of the first direction and the second direction from the center point; a fourth edge located in a fourth direction opposite to the third direction from the center point and opposite to the third edge with the center point therebetween; a fifth edge connecting the first edge and the third edge; a sixth edge connecting the second edge and the fourth edge and opposite to the fifth edge with the center point therebetween; a seventh edge connecting the first edge and the fourth edge; and an eighth edge connecting the second edge and the third edge and opposite to the seventh edge with the center point therebetween (Kim teaches a regular octagonal electrode shape as can be seen in above rejection of claim 11 and Kim’s fig. 1. As Kim teaches a regular octagon, the 8 edges of that shape would have the above claimed configuration). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 13, wherein a first imaginary line extending from the center point to the first edge and substantially perpendicular to the first edge is inclined by about 45 degrees in a counterclockwise direction from a second imaginary line extending from the center point to the seventh edge and substantially perpendicular to the seventh edge in the plan view (As Kim teaches a regular octagonal electrode shape, a first imaginary line extending from its center to a first edge in a perpendicular fashion would be inclined by 45 degrees in a counterclockwise direction with respect to a second imaginary line extending from its center to a seventh edge, see above rejection of claim 13), and a third imaginary line extending from the center point to the second edge and substantially perpendicular to the second edge is inclined by about 45 degrees in the counterclockwise direction from a fourth imaginary line extending from the center point to the eighth edge and substantially perpendicular to the eighth edge in the plan view (As Kim teaches a regular octagonal electrode shape, a third imaginary line extending from its center to a second edge in a perpendicular fashion would be inclined by 45 degrees in a counterclockwise direction with respect to a fourth imaginary line extending from its center to a eighth edge, see above rejection of claim 13). Regarding claim 15, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 14, wherein a fifth imaginary line extending from the center point to the third edge and substantially perpendicular to the third edge is inclined by about 45 degrees in a clockwise direction from the fourth imaginary line in the plan view (As Kim teaches a regular octagonal electrode shape, a fifth imaginary line extending from its center to a third edge in a perpendicular fashion would be inclined by 45 degrees in a clockwise direction with respect to the fourth imaginary line extending from its center to a eighth edge, see above rejection of claims 13-14), and a sixth imaginary line extending from the center point to the fourth edge and substantially perpendicular to the fourth edge is inclined by about 45 degrees in the clockwise direction from the second imaginary line in the plan view (As Kim teaches a regular octagonal electrode shape, a sixth imaginary line extending from its center to a third edge in a perpendicular fashion would be inclined by 45 degrees in a clockwise direction with respect to the second imaginary line extending from its center to a seventh edge, see above rejection of claims 13-14). Regarding claim 16, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 13, wherein the pixel electrode overlaps the first to eighth edges in the plan view (Fig. 2 lower electrode 172 overlaps conductive member 160 and, given the plan view shown in fig. 1A, the lower electrode would overlap all eight sides of the conductive member as taught by Kim), and a portion of an upper surface of the pixel electrode adjacent to the first edge and a portion of the upper surface of the pixel electrode adjacent to the second edge are substantially flat (Figs. 1B/2 a portion of an upper surface of first electrode adjacent to conductive member 160 near right portion of first extension portions 162 and a portion of an upper surface of first electrode adjacent to conductive member 160 near left portion of first extension portions 162 are both substantially flat). Regarding claim 17, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 13, wherein each of portions of an upper surface of the pixel electrode adjacent to the third to eighth edges, respectively, have a stepped structure (Fig. 2 first electrode 172 has a stepped structure in the outer area of display area OA. As Kim teaches a regular octagonal shape, lower electrode 172 would have such a stepped structure adjacent to the third through eighth edges). Regarding claim 18, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 10, further comprising: a first via insulating layer and a second via insulating layer, which are disposed between io the substrate and the pixel electrode (Fig. 9 insulation layers 150 and 165 are disposed between substrate 110 and lower electrode 172); and a lower conductive layer disposed between the substrate and the first via insulating layer (Fig. 9 electrode 141 disposed between substrate 110 and insulation layer 150), and wherein the conductive line is disposed between the first via insulating layer and the second via insulating layer (Fig. 9 conductive member 160 disposed between insulation layers 150 and 165), is electrically connected to the pixel electrode through a contact hole is defined in the second via insulating layer, and is electrically connected to the lower conductive layer through a contact hole defined in the first via insulating layer (Fig. 9 conductive member and all the other pixel elements electrically connected through vias defined in both insulation layers 165 and 150). Regarding claim 19, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 10, wherein the conductive line includes: a data line which transmits a data voltage (Par. 21 “the first conductive member may include a data line pattern which transmits a data voltage”); a power supply voltage line which transmits a power supply voltage (Par. 21 “the first conductive member may include…a driving voltage line pattern which transmits a driving voltage”); and an initialization voltage line which transmits an initialization voltage (Par. 21 “the first conductive member may include…a contact pattern electrically connected to the thin film transistors, the data line pattern, and the driving voltage line pattern”). Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US20180277040A1) in view of Kim (US20220123080A1) as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Choi (US20200365665A1). Regarding claim 20, the combination of Lee and Kim teaches the display device of claim 10, further comprising: a light emitting layer disposed on the pixel electrode (Lee fig. 2 light emitting layer 174); a common electrode disposed on the light emitting layer; and a polarization layer disposed on the common electrode (Fig. 2 second electrode 176). Lee does not appear to teach a polarization layer disposed on the common electrode. Choi teaches a polarization layer disposed on the common electrode (Par. 131 “Components such as …a polarizer…may be further arranged on the sealing member”). Being in analogous arts, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Lee and Kim with the teachings of Choi because the inclusion of a polarizer minimizes reflection effects (Choi par. 131). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COLE LEON LINDSEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4028. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COLE LEON LINDSEY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /CHRISTINE S. KIM/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593630
PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A SILICON CARBIDE DEVICE AND SILICON CARBIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575330
ORDERED ALLOY MAGNETIC TUNNEL JUNCTION WITH SIMPLIFIED SEED STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12550407
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH BACKSIDE VIA AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543538
TEMPORARY FIXATION LAYERED FILM AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR, TEMPORARY FIXATION LAYERED BODY, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12532501
STRUCTURE WITH BACK-GATE HAVING OPPOSITELY DOPED SEMICONDUCTOR REGIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 116 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month