Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/534,948

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH FILLING LAYER AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 11, 2023
Examiner
BOOTH, RICHARD A
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nanya Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
878 granted / 1029 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1064
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.2%
+16.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1029 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I in the reply filed on 03/12/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang, US 2020/0161450 in view of Usami, US 2015/0372102 and further in view of Welmer et al., US 2020/0027725. Huang shows the invention substantially as claimed including a semiconductor device, comprising: A substrate 210; A gate electrode 224 disposed on the substrate; A source region 240 and a drain region 242 disposed in the substrate and on opposite sides of the gate electrode; An isolating layer 270 disposed over the substrate and the gate electrode; A plurality of metal contacts 320 disposed on the gate electrode, the source region, and the drain region; A contact liner 330 disposed in the isolating layer; A plurality of conductive plugs 350 disposed in the isolating layer and surrounded by the contact liner, and electrically coupled to the metal contacts (see figs. 2-16 and paragraphs 0033-0048). Huang does not expressly disclose a filling layer disposed in the isolating layer and wherein the filling layer comprises boron carbonitride. Usami discloses forming a filling layer DL1 in the isolating layer DL2 (see fig. 32 and paragraphs 0114-0120). In view of this disclosure, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the primary reference of Hung so as to comprise the filling layer and process of Usami because this is shown as a way in which to eliminate any potential air gaps in the layer that will degrade device performance. Additionally, Welmer et al. discloses the use of boron carbonitride as a filling layer 141 in order to seal pores and air gaps (see, for example, abstract and paragraphs 0021 and 0095-0102). In view of this disclosure, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the primary reference of Hung modified by Usami so as use boron carbonitride as the filling layer because Welmer et al. shows boron carbonitride to be a suitable filling material. Concerning dependent claim 2, note that in the device of Huang modified by Usami and Welmer et al. discloses wherein a plurality of air gaps are disposed in the filling layer and enclosed by the filling layer (see, for example, fig. 12 of Usami and its description). With respect to dependent claim 3, note that Huang discloses wherein the semiconductor device further includes a barrier layer 335 disposed between the plurality of conductive plugs 350 and the contact liner 330 (see fig. 17). Regarding dependent claim 4, note that Huang discloses wherein the isolating layer includes an underlying dielectric layer 270 and an overlying dielectric layer 280, wherein the underlying dielectric layer is disposed on the substrate and surrounds the gate electrode, and the overlying dielectric layer is disposed over the underlying dielectric layer and the gate electrode (see fig. 5). Concerning dependent claim 5, note that the device of Huang modified by Usami and Welmer et al. discloses wherein a top portion of the air gap is located at a vertical level lower than a top surface of the overlying dielectric layer (see, for example, fig. 12 of Usami). With respect to dependent claim 6, note that Huang discloses wherein a top surface of the plurality of metal contacts in the gate electrode is coplanar with an upper surface of the underlying dielectric layer, and top surfaces of the other metal contacts in the source region and the drain region are coplanar with a front surface of the substrate (see, for example, fig. 17). As to dependent claim 7, note that Huang discloses wherein the semiconductor device further includes a gate dielectric 222 and a gate spacer 230, wherein the gate dielectric is disposed between the substrate and the gate electrode, and the gate spacer is disposed on sidewalls of the gate electrode and the gate dielectric (see fig. 3). Concerning dependent claim 8, note that Huang discloses wherein the semiconductor device further includes a plurality of isolating regions 214 disposed in the substrate to define and electrically isolate one or more active areas comprising the gate electrode, the source region, and the drain region (see paragraph 0033). With respect to dependent claim 9, note that in Huang the insulating regions 214 are shallow trench isolation structures (again, see paragraph 0033). Regarding dependent claim 10, note that neither Huang, Usami and Welmer et al. do not expressly disclose the particular ratio of width of the filling layer to the width of air gaps. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to determine through routine experimentation the optimum width of the filling layer to the width of air gaps depending upon a variety of factors including, for example, the desired capacitance of the filling layer and such limitation would not lend patentability to the instant application absent a showing of unexpected results. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD A BOOTH whose telephone number is (571)272-1668. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 8:30 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at 571-272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD A BOOTH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 March 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598993
THREE-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593445
Control Gate Structures in Three-Dimensional Memory Devices and Methods for Forming the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593443
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593664
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593454
FERROELECTRIC TUNNEL JUNCTION STRUCTURE WITH L-SHAPED SPACERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1029 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month