Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/566,338

RESIST COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR FORMING RESIST PATTERN, METHOD FOR PRODUCING COMPOUNDS, INTERMEDIATE, AND COMPOUNDS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Priority
Jun 15, 2021 — JP 2021-099364 +3 more
Examiner
EOFF, ANCA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
999 granted / 1249 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1285
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1249 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-11 are pending. The foreign priority document No.2021-099364 filed on June 15, 2021, the foreign priority document No. 2021-099674 filed on June 15, 2021, and the foreign priority document No. 2022-091800 filed on June 06, 2022 in Japan have been received and are acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 102 that forms the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hatakeyama et al. (US 2021/0048746). With regard to claim 1, Hatakeyama et al. teach a resist composition comprising as base polymer the Polymer 1, PAG-4 acid generator, and the Quencher 4: PNG media_image1.png 200 352 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 288 352 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 230 356 media_image3.png Greyscale (Example 4 in Table 1, par.0174, Quencher-1 in par.0166, PAG-4 in par.0171). The Polymer 1 comprises acid labile groups (par.0026, par.0071-0072), and is “a resin component (A) whose solubility in a developing solution is changed due to the action of an acid” in claim 1. PAG-4 is “an acid generator component (B) which generates an acid upon light exposure” in claim 1, wherein the acid generator component (B) contains a compound (B0) of General Formula (b0), wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, Yb0 is a divalent linking group, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, Rb1and Rb3-Rb15 are hydrogen atoms, Rb2 is a perfluoroalkyl group. Therefore, the resist composition in Example 4 of Hatakeyama et al. anticipates the resist composition in claim 1 of the instant application. With regard to claim 2, PAG-4 of Hatakeyama et al. is a compound (B0) including a compound (B01) represented by General Formula (b0-1), wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, L01 is -OCO-, z=0, L02 is a single bond, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, Rb1 and Rb3-Rb15 are hydrogen atoms, Rb2 is a perfluoroalkyl group. With regard to claim 3, Quencher 4 of Hatakeyama et al. is a “base component (D) which traps an acid generated upon light exposure”, wherein the base component (D) contains a compound of General Formula (d1-1), wherein m=1, Mm+ is a monovalent cation, Rd1 is a chain alkyl which has a substituent. With regard to claims 4 and 5, Hatakeyama et al. teach a process comprising the steps of: -forming a resist film using the resist composition; -exposing the resist film with EUV radiation through a mask; and -developing the exposed resist film (par.0172). With regard to claim 6, PAG-4 of Hatakeyama et al. is a compound of General Formula (b0), wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, Yb0 is a divalent linking group, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, Rb1 and Rb3-Rb15 are hydrogen atoms, Rb2 is a pefluoroalkyl group. With regard to claim 7, PAG-4 of Hatakeyama et al. is a compound of General Formula (b0-1), wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, L01 is -OCO-, z=0, L02 is a single bond, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, Rb1 and Rb3-Rb15 are hydrogen atoms, Rb2 is a perfluoroalkyl group. With regard to claim 8, PAG-4 of Hatakeyama et al. is an acid generator (see Table 1 in par.0174). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hatakeyama et al. (US 2021/0048746) in view of Yamazaki et al. (US 2016/0376233). With regard to claims 9 and 10, Hatakeyama et al. teach PAG 4 of formula: PNG media_image2.png 288 352 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0171), which is a compound of formula (b0’) in claim 9, wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, L01 is -OCO-, z=0, L02 is a single bond, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, m=1, and Mm+ is an organic cation. Hatakeyama et al. fail to teach the process in claim 9 and the intermediate in claim 10. Yamazaki et al. teach a positive type resists composition comprising a sulfonium salt (abstract), and further teach the method of obtaining the sulfonium salt: PNG media_image4.png 146 364 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 136 334 media_image5.png Greyscale (par.0167). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to use the method of Yamazaki et al. and obtain the sulfonium salt PAG 4 of Hatakeyama et al. PAG4 of Hatakeyama et al. may be obtained from the reaction of: PNG media_image6.png 170 378 media_image6.png Greyscale and PNG media_image7.png 152 316 media_image7.png Greyscale . PNG media_image6.png 170 378 media_image6.png Greyscale is a compound (B0p) in claims 9 and 10, wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, L01 is -OCO-, z=0, L02 is a single bond, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, m’=1, and Mpm’ is a Na+ (a metal cation). PNG media_image7.png 152 316 media_image7.png Greyscale is a compound of formula (C-3) in claim 9, wherein X- is a counter anion, m=1, and Mm+ is an organic cation. Hatakeyama et al. and Yamazaki et al. fail to specifically teach that a compound of formula (b0-p) is obtained from the reaction of the compounds (C-1) and (C-2) in claim 9. However, the compound of formula: PNG media_image6.png 170 378 media_image6.png Greyscale comprises an ester bond, and an ester bond is formed from the reaction of a carboxylic acid with an alcohol. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to obtain the compound above from the reaction of PNG media_image8.png 510 612 media_image8.png Greyscale with an acid of formula HOOC-CF2-SO3- Na+. PNG media_image8.png 510 612 media_image8.png Greyscale is a compound of formula (C-1) in claim 9, wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, and a is a hydroxy group. HOOC-CF2-SO3- Na+ is a compound of formula (C-2) in claim 9, wherein b is a carboxy group, z=0, L02 and Vb0 are single bonds, R0 is a fluorine atom, m’=1, and Mpm’ is a Na+ (a metal cation). With regard to claim 11, Hatakeyama et al. teach PAG 4 of formula: PNG media_image2.png 288 352 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0171), but does not teach the compound in claim 11. Yamazaki et al. teach a positive type resists composition comprising a sulfonium salt (abstract), and further teach the method of obtaining the sulfonium salt: PNG media_image4.png 146 364 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 136 334 media_image5.png Greyscale (par.0167). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to use the method of Yamazaki et al. and obtain the sulfonium salt PAG 4 of Hatakeyama et al. The method uses a compound of formula: PNG media_image9.png 180 374 media_image9.png Greyscale , which is a compound of General Formula (b0-p-1), wherein nb1=3, X0 is an iodine atom, nb2=0, L001 is an ester bond (-OCO-), z=0, L02 is a single bond, Vb0 is a single bond, R0 is a fluorine atom, m=1, and Mm+ is a metal cation. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hatakeyama et al. (US 2022/0004100) teach a photoresist composition comprising the polymer P-3 and the acid generator PAG-4: PNG media_image10.png 314 560 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 138 292 media_image11.png Greyscale (Example 21 in Table 1, par.0183, PAG-4 in par.0180, and polymer P-3 in par.0175). Hatakeyama et al. (US 2022/0057713) teach a photoresist composition comprising the polymer P-1 and the acid generator PAG-4: PNG media_image12.png 210 380 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 214 412 media_image13.png Greyscale (Example 10 in Table 1, par.0192, polymer P-1 in par.0185, PAG-4 in par.0189). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANCA EOFF whose telephone number is (571)272-9810. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at (571)272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANCA EOFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683144
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658462
Hydrogen fuel cell power source with metal bipolar plates
8y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655111
Novel Phenazine-Based Compounds
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651780
BATTERY USING LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE-LIKE COMPOUND
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646733
HYDROGEN FUEL CELL POWER SOURCE WITH METAL BIPOLAR PLATES
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1249 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month