Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/575,254

NANOPORE SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF FABRICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Priority
Nov 15, 2021 — provisional 63/264,080 +1 more
Examiner
KAUR, GURPREET
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Illumina Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
507 granted / 780 resolved
At TC average
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.4%
+39.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims 1. Claims 1-7 are being examined in this application Claims 8-22 are withdrawn. Election/Restrictions 2. Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-7 in the reply filed on 5/01/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xie et al. (US 2020/0292521) in view of Su et al. (CN1860370, examiner is using English machine translation). Claims 1 and 6. Xie et al. teach a nanopore device (nanopore sensor 102; [0183]), comprising: an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) layer (integrated circuit layer 150 which is specific to nanopore sensing [0198], thus integrated circuit layer reads on ASIC; [0198] and Fig 3b), wherein the ASIC layer comprises active circuitry on a front side semiconductor wafer (integrated circuit is comprised of electronic circuit on a front of CMOS wafer; [0186]): a post array layer under the ASIC layer, wherein the post array layer comprises an array of posts on a front side of a support substrate (array of channels 122a on a front side of base layer 112 and disposed under the integrated circuit layer 150; [0207] and Fig 4b) and a nanopore layer over the ASIC layer, wherein the nanopore layer comprises a plurality of middle chambers over the active circuitry, a membrane on the plurality of middle chambers, and a plurality of nanopores inserted in the membrane over the plurality of middle chambers (nanopore layer 110 over the integrated circuit layer 150, the nanopore layer comprises plurality of wells 142, a membrane 118 on the plurality of wells 142 and plurality of nanopores 116 in the membrane ([0188][0202] and Fig 3b and 4a). Xie et al. do not teach integrate circuit layer comprises a thinned-down semiconductor wafer. However, Su et al. teach method of forming nanopore device comprised of electronic components as part of integrated circuit deposited on substrate film with thickness range of several nanometers to 100 microns [0081]. Since Su et al. and Xie et al. are to same field of endeavor i.e. nanopore device comprising integrated circuitry, therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention in view of Su et al. teaching to construct the integrated circuit layer of Xie et al. of thin substrate layer having thickness in the range several nanometers to 100 microns because applying a known technique to a known device (method or product) ready for improvement to yield predictable results is likely to be obvious (see MPEP § 2143, D.). Claim 2. Xie et al. teach nanopore device further comprising: a cis chamber over the nanopore layer, wherein at least one of the plurality of nanopores fluidically connects the cis chamber to at least one of the plurality of middle chambers (cis chamber 106 over the nanopore layer and nanopore 116 fluidically connect the cis chamber to middle chamber 142; see Fig 3a and [0160][0202]); and a trans chamber under the ASIC layer, wherein the trans chamber comprises the array of posts (outlet chamber 108 is under the integrated circuit layer 150; see Fig 3b, wherein the chamber comprises the array of channels 122 of base layer 112; see Figs 4b, 9). Claim 3. Xie et al. teach a plurality of fluidic channels extending through the ASIC layer, wherein at least one of the plurality of fluidic channels fluidically connects at least one of the plurality of middle chambers to the trans chamber (channels 114 forms fluidic passage which extends into the integrated circuit layer and connects the chamber 142 to the outlet chamber 108; see Fig 3b and [0176]). Claim 4. Xie et al. teach at least one of the plurality of fluidic channels comprises a horizontal channel and a vertical channel (channel 114 (vertical channel) is connected to horizontal section 146 to fluidically connect the chamber 142 to the outlet chamber 108; see Fig 3b). Claim 5. Xie et al. teach a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet reaching the trans chamber through the nanopore layer and the ASIC layer (Fig 3b shows fluid flows through the cis chamber 106 through the nanopore layer into the integrated circuit layer and into the trans chamber via 114 passage; see Fig 3b and [0175]). Claim 7. Xie et al. teach the support substrate comprises silicon, semiconductor, sapphire, dielectric, polymer or glass (the base layer 112 is made up of silicon wafer; [0186]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GURPREET KAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-7895. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GURPREET KAUR/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662577
TEMPERATURE-INSENSITIVE MEMBRANE MATERIALS AND ANALYTE SENSORS CONTAINING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653430
INTERFERENCE REJECTION MEMBRANES COMPRISING CROSSLINKED POLY(VINYL ALCOHOL) MATRICES FOR IMPLANTABLE GLUCOSE SENSORS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650400
BIOSENSOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644861
MODULAR MULTI-CHANNEL POTENTIOSTAT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12644856
REFERENCE ELECTRODES OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.4%)
3y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month