DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
The amendment filed on January 30, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1-4, 6-15 and 17-20 are pending in this application.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-4, 6-15 and 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by deVilliers [US 20190217326 A1].
As per Claim 1, deVilliers teaches a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device (Para 8, wherein systems and methods for dispensing liquids on a substrate with real-time coverage and progression control), comprising:
supplying a developer on a substrate (A dispense unit is configured to dispense liquid on a working surface of the substrate while the substrate is being rotated on the substrate holder);
capturing, by a capturing device (image capturing device 130) of an analysis subsystem, a distribution information of the developer (fluid progression and behavior) on the substrate (See fig. 1, Para 35, substrate 105);
generating, by a processor of the analysis subsystem, an assessment result
based on the distribution information (Para 31 and 36); and
determining whether to perform an adjustment operation based on the
assessment result, wherein if it is determined not to perform the adjustment operation
based on the assessment result, both of a rotational speed of a motor and a thrust of a
pump are maintained, and wherein the motor 123 is connected to a substrate support stage 122 below the substrate 105 (See fig. 1, Para 31 and 36, wherein a real-time look at a substrate coat's future, as well as the capability of that coat by looking at data from the stroboscope and applying that data as real-time feedback, such as to identify a dispense and/or rotation stopping point. An image processor can be connected to a high-speed camera and stroboscope. The image processor can analyze stroboscopic images (video) of a coating application to make adjustments to spin speed and dispense speed/amount. Such controls can adjust to variable process conditions in real-time).
As per Claim 2, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, wherein performing the
adjustment operation comprises changing the rotational speed of the motor (Para 36,
wherein the system controller 160 is arranged to control a corresponding dispense system and/or substrate spinning mechanism).
As per Claim 3, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, wherein performing the
adjustment operation comprises changing the thrust of the pump (Para 36-37, wherein
controller 160 is configured to adjust a volume of the liquid dispensed with the use of flow controllers).
As per Claim 4, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 3, wherein the thrust of the pump is changed such that a dispense rate of the developer is changed (Para 36-37).
As per Claim 6, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the assessment result is generated by comparing the distribution information with a reference distribution information saved in the analysis subsystem (Para 42).
As per Claim 7, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising:
transmitting a control signal based on the assessment result from the processor of
the analysis subsystem (Para 55).
As per Claim 8, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising:
rotating the substrate prior to capturing the distribution information of the
developer on the substrate (Para 54).
As per Claim 9, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising:
stopping supplying the developer after determining whether to perform the
adjustment operation based on the assessment result (Para 61).
As per Claim 10, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the distribution information of the developer on the substrate includes a surface image of the developer on the substrate (Para 73).
As per Claim 11, deVilliers teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising:
forming a resist layer over the substrate prior to supplying the developer on the
substrate (Para 42-44).
As per Claim 12, deVilliers teaches a semiconductor device manufacturing system 100 (See fig. 1, Para 31-32), comprising:
a chamber (not labeled);
a substrate support stage (the substrate holder 122) positioned in the chamber and configured to support a substrate 105;
a nozzle 111 positioned over the substrate support stage and configured to supply a developer 117 on the substrate during a developing process (See fig. 1, Para 44);
an analysis subsystem (Para 36, system controller 160) comprising:
a capturing device (Image capturing device 130) configured to capture a distribution information of the developer on the substrate (Para 36); and
a processor configured to generate an assessment result based on the
distribution information, wherein the processor is further configured to determine
whether to perform an adjustment operation based on the assessment result (Para 31); and
an adjustment controller 160 connected to the analysis subsystem, wherein the
processor 150 of the analysis subsystem is further configured to generate a second control signal and transmit the second control signal to the adjustment controller if it is
determined not to perform the adjustment operation (Para 31), wherein the adjustment controller is configured to maintain both of a rotational speed of a motor and a thrust of a pump (adjustments to spin speed and dispense speed/amount) in response to the second control signal, wherein the motor is connected to the substrate support stage and configured to rotate the substrate, and wherein the pump is connected to the nozzle 111 (See fig. 1, Para 31-36, wherein a real-time look at a substrate coat's future, as well as the capability of that coat by looking at data from the stroboscope and applying that data as real-time feedback, such as to identify a dispense and/or rotation stopping point. An image processor can be connected to a high-speed camera and stroboscope. The image processor can analyze stroboscopic images (video) of a coating application to make adjustments to spin speed and dispense speed/amount. Such controls can adjust to variable process conditions in real-time).
As per Claim 13, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 12, wherein the processor of the analysis subsystem is further configured to generate a first control signal and transmit the first control signal to the adjustment controller if it is determined to perform the adjustment operation (Para 38).
As per Claim 14, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 13, wherein the adjustment controller is configured to change the rotational speed of the motor in response to the first control signal (Para 31 and 76).
As per Claim 15, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 13, wherein the adjustment controller is configured to change the thrust of the pump in response to the first control signal, and wherein the pump is configured to adjust a dispense rate of the developer from the nozzle (Para 36-37, wherein controller 160 is configured to adjust a volume of the liquid dispensed with the use of flow controllers).
As per Claim 17, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 12, wherein configured to adjust a dispense rate of the developer from the nozzle (See fig. 1, Para 32 and 36).
As per Claim 18, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 12, wherein the processor of the analysis subsystem is configured to generate the assessment result by comparing the distribution information with a reference distribution information (Para 42).
As per Claim 19, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 12, further comprising: a main server connected to the adjustment controller, wherein the main server is configured to start the developing process (Para 36).
As per Claim 20, deVilliers teaches the semiconductor device manufacturing system of claim 12, wherein the capturing device of the analysis subsystem includes at least one camera, and wherein the distribution information of the developer on the substrate includes a surface image of the developer on the substrate (See fig. 1, Para 35).
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed January 30, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
In the remark section, with respect to claim 1, Applicant argued that the prior art to deVilliers does not disclosed the claimed limitation of "wherein if it is determined not to perform the adjustment operation based on the assessment result, both of a rotational speed of a motor and a thrust of a pump are maintained, and wherein the motor is connected to a substrate support stage below the substrate.".
The Examiner respectfully disagrees. deVilliers, for example in [0031], disclosed that a real-time look at a substrate coat's future, as well as the capability of that coat by looking at data from the stroboscope and applying that data as real-time feedback, such as to identify a dispense and/or rotation stopping point. An image processor can be connected to a high-speed camera and stroboscope. The image processor can analyze stroboscopic images (video) of a coating (based on the assessment result ) application to make adjustments to spin speed and dispense speed/amount (both of a rotational speed of a motor and a thrust of a pump are maintained). Such controls can adjust to variable process conditions in real-time (wherein the control system determines whether to perform or not to perform the adjustment operation on the motor/pump of the system wherein releasing precise dispense volume of liquid in specific time, requires control of thrust amount of the pump).
With respect to claim 12, Applicant also argued that deVilliers does not teach "an adjustment controller connected to the analysis subsystem, wherein the processor of the analysis subsystem is further configured to generate a second control signal and transmit the second control signal to the adjustment controller if it is determined not to perform the adjustment operation, wherein the adjustment controller is configured to maintain both of a rotational speed of a motor and a thrust of a pump in response to the second control signal, wherein the motor is connected to the substrate support stage and configured to rotate the substrate, and wherein the pump is connected to the nozzle.”
The Examiner disagrees. an adjustment controller 160 connected to the analysis subsystem (130 and 140), wherein the processor 150 of the analysis subsystem is further configured to generate a second control signal and transmit the second control signal to the adjustment controller if it is determined not to perform the adjustment operation (Para 36), wherein the adjustment controller is configured to maintain both of a rotational speed of a motor and a thrust of a pump in response to the second control signal, wherein the motor 123 is connected to the substrate support stage and configured to rotate the substrate, and wherein the pump is connected to the nozzle (Para 36, wherein feedback control loop connected to the system controller 160 is arranged to control a corresponding dispense system and/or substrate spinning mechanism). Therefore, Applicant’s argument on the above points is not persuasive.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MESFIN ASFAW whose telephone number is (571)270-5247. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 4 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/MESFIN T ASFAW/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Prosecution Insights