Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/594,675

METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 04, 2024
Priority
Mar 15, 2023 — JP 2023-041326
Examiner
LASASSO, VICTOR JOSEPH
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kokusai Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
40 granted / 46 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 46 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Embodiment 2 (Claims 1-3, 5-16, 18-20 readable thereon with claims 4, 17 withdrawn) in the reply filed on July 13, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3, 5-16, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 1, Claim 1 contains the phrase, “(d) after (c), supplying a reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate.” This phrase is seen as indefinite as it could read as “(d) starting (c)”, or “(d) after ending (c)”. In the interest of compact prosecution and as a courtesy, the application will be examined as the former. Claims 2-3, 5-16, 18 are dependent upon Claim 1, and inherit the above deficiencies. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding Claim 19, Claim 19 contains the phrase, “(d) after (c), supplying a reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate.” This phrase is seen as indefinite as it could read as “(d) starting (c)”, or “(d) after ending (c)”. In the interest of compact prosecution and as a courtesy, the application will be examined as the former. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding Claim 20, Claim 20 contains the phrase, “(d) after (c), supplying a reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate.” This phrase is seen as indefinite as it could read as “(d) starting (c)”, or “(d) after ending (c)”. In the interest of compact prosecution and as a courtesy, the application will be examined as the former. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-16, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al (USPGPUB 20100167554, hereinafter “Lee”) in view of Wang et al (USPGPUB 20230126516, hereinafter “Wang”). Regarding Claim 1, A method of processing a substrate, comprising: forming a film (Fig. 13, a film is seen formed on an inner surface of a recess) containing a predetermined element ([0117], “the isolation layer 302 may be formed on the substrate 300 using an oxide such as silicon oxide by a thermal oxidation process or a shallow trench isolation (STI) process.”) over an inner surface of a recess formed on a surface of the substrate by performing a cycle a predetermined number of times ([0092], “when the target layer 140 having the predetermined thickness is formed by repeated application of the unit cycle, the introduction quantity of the first precursor 120 may be appropriately adjusted per the unit cycle to maintain the atomic number ratio”), the cycle including performing: (a) supplying a first modifying agent (Fig. 2B, 30) containing a first halogen element ([0053], “, the first ligand 34 may include a halogen atom such as fluoro (F), chloro (Cl), bromo (Br), iodo (I), etc., a hydroxyl (OH) group, ammine (NH.sub.3)”) to the substrate; (b) supplying a second modifying agent (Fig. 6D, 230) containing a second halogen element ([0112],“ the second central atom 232 may include the silicon atom. Here, when the reactant includes oxygen or ozone, the target layer 240 may include hafnium silicate”; [0065], “The second ligand 54 may include a halogen atom such as fluoro, chloro, bromo, iodo, etc., a hydroxyl group, amine, an amine group having a carbon atom of about 1 to 10”), which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent, to the substrate (a possible embodiment would be for the second modifying agent to be a fluorosilane gas, which would be different than an embodiment of a pure halogen gas such as a pure bromine gas, which is an obvious embodiment for the first modifying agent); Lee is silent with regards to (c) after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying a precursor containing the predetermined element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate. Wang teaches after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying a precursor containing the predetermined element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate ([0040], “the halogenated precursor includes a halogenated silane compound that can be represented by the formula H.sub.2n+2-ySi.sub.nX.sub.y”; A halogen silane gas, such as hexachlorodisilane can be used as a precursor to make way for the reactant step in the formation of the film). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, absent unexpected results, before the date of effective filing, to incorporate the halogen silane gas precursor step of Wang into the method of Lee in order to arrive at the expected result of creating a fabrication method with the a gas compatible with the instant process, while also having the known benefit of the ease of purification associated with a volatile halogen silane gas with reasonable expectation of success. Lee in view of Wang teaches (d) after (c), supplying a reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate (Lee [0068], “the reactant may include a compound having an oxygen atom and/or nitrogen atom. For example, the reactant may include ozone (O.sub.3), oxygen (O.sub.2), water vapor (H.sub.2O), an oxygen plasma, an ozone plasma, ammonia (NH.sub.3)”). Regarding Claim 2, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein the first modifying agent does not contain the predetermined element, and the second modifying agent contains the predetermined element (as described above, one of the embodiments taught by Lee in view of Wang is one where the first modifying agent contains a halogen, but not silicon, the predetermined element, and the second modifying agent contains silicon, being a fluorosilane). Regarding Claim 3, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein the first modifying agent is lower in a rate of adsorption on the inner surface of the recess than the second modifying agent (a fluorosilane has a higher rate of surface adsorption than that of a standard halogen-hafnium gas). Regarding Claim 5, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein in (a), a first termination terminated with the first halogen element is formed on the inner surface of the recess (Lee Fig. 2B, an active termination group of the first halogen, represented as a Ligand L1, is seen formed on the surface). Regarding Claim 6, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 5, wherein in (b), a second termination terminated with the second halogen element is formed on the inner surface of the recess (Lee Fig. , an active termination group of the second halogen, which would be Fluorine as a portion of the fluorosilane, represented as a Ligand L2, is seen formed on the surface). Regarding Claim 7, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 6, wherein the first termination is greater in adsorption-suppressing effect on the precursor than the second termination (the adsorption of fluorosilane is known to have a greater adsorption-suppressing effect than that of a halogen-hafnium gas). Regarding Claim 8, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 6, wherein in (b), the second termination is formed such that at least a portion of a region on the inner surface where the second termination is formed overlaps a region on the inner surface where the first termination is formed (Fig. 5B, the first and second terminations, found at the first and second reaction sites, are the result of a “partial transformation”, wherein those 2 reaction sites would be seen at least partially localized in the same areas). Regarding Claim 9, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 6, wherein the second modifying agent is a modifying agent (Fluorosilane) that contains the predetermined element (silicon), and wherein in (b), the second termination containing the predetermined element is formed on the inner surface of the recess (as seen in Figs. 12-14 of Lee, the first and second termination reactions are seen occurring on a recess). Regarding Claim 10, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 6, wherein in (b), the formation of the second termination is more suppressed in a region where the first termination is formed than in a region on the inner surface of the recess where the first termination is not formed (the first termination, that of a halogen-hafnium compound, would suppress the formation of a termination group of a fluorosilane, which is that of the second termination). Regarding Claim 11, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 6, wherein in (c), the first halogen element constituting the first termination and the second halogen element constituting the second termination are desorbed by reacting with atoms of the predetermined element containing a dangling bond generated from the precursor ([0026], “purging steps can also be utilized during and/or between cycles to remove excess precursor from the process chamber and/or remove excess reactant and/or reaction byproducts from the process chamber”; ). Regarding Claim 12, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 6, wherein in (c), adsorption of the predetermined element (silicon) is more suppressed on a region of the inner surface of the recess where at least one selected from the group of the first termination and the second termination is formed than on a region of the inner surface of the recess where both the first termination and the second termination are not formed (the adsorption of silicon would be suppressed by the presence of halogen hafnium compounds and fluorosilanes). Regarding Claim 13, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein the second modifying agent is a gas that contains the predetermined element (silicon) and does not contain a bond between the predetermined elements in one molecule (fluorosilanes do not contain multiple silicon atoms bonded within a single molecule), and the precursor is a gas that contains the bond between the predetermined elements (bonds between 2 silicon atoms in one molecule) in one molecule (a fluorosilane, that which is the second modifying agent, is a gas with only one silicon element, whereas a precursor of hexachlorodisilane contains a bond between two silicon atoms in each molecule). Regarding Claim 14, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein the precursor is a gas that contains a third halogen element (a precursor of hexachlorodisilane contains the halogen chlorine). Regarding Claim 15, Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein in the cycle, (a) is started before (b) (Lee Fig. 3, the process flow shows step (a) occurring and then step (b) occurring afterwards ). Regarding Claim 16 Lee in view of Wang teaches the method of Claim 1, wherein in the cycle, (a) and (b) are performed such that periods of (a) and (b) overlap at least partially (Fig. 5 of Lee, processes S200 S210 and S220 describe a process flow where the presence of introducing the first modifying agent and the second modifying agent can occur prior to completing the processes of surface termination formation). Regarding Claim 18, Lee in view of Wang teaches a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising the method of Claim 1 (Lee Fig. 13, the semiconductor device being manufactured is seen). Claim(s) 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kihara et al (USPGPUB 20190214246, hereinafter “Kihara”) in view of Lee and in further view of Wang. Regarding Claim 19, Kihara teaches a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing a program that causes, by a computer, a substrate processing apparatus to perform a process ([0079], “the controller Cnt operates in accordance with a computer program (a program based on an input recipe) for controlling each unit of the plasma processing apparatus 10 in each step of method MT illustrated in FIG. 1, and sends out a control signal. Each unit of the plasma processing apparatus 10 is controlled by the control signal from the controller Cnt.”). Kihara is silent with regards to that process comprising: forming a film containing a predetermined element over an inner surface of a recess formed on a surface of a substrate by performing a cycle a predetermined number of times, the cycle including performing: (a) supplying a first modifying agent containing a first halogen element to the substrate; (b) supplying a second modifying agent containing a second halogen element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent, to the substrate; (c) after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying a precursor containing the predetermined element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate; and (d) after (c), supplying a reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate. Lee teaches a process comprising: forming a film (Fig. 13, a film is seen formed on an inner surface of a recess) containing a predetermined element ([0117], “the isolation layer 302 may be formed on the substrate 300 using an oxide such as silicon oxide by a thermal oxidation process or a shallow trench isolation (STI) process.”) over an inner surface of a recess formed on a surface of the substrate by performing a cycle a predetermined number of times ([0092], “when the target layer 140 having the predetermined thickness is formed by repeated application of the unit cycle, the introduction quantity of the first precursor 120 may be appropriately adjusted per the unit cycle to maintain the atomic number ratio”), the cycle including performing: (a) supplying a first modifying agent (Fig. 2B, 30) containing a first halogen element ([0053], “, the first ligand 34 may include a halogen atom such as fluoro (F), chloro (Cl), bromo (Br), iodo (I), etc., a hydroxyl (OH) group, ammine (NH.sub.3)”) to the substrate; (b) supplying a second modifying agent (Fig. 6D, 230) containing a second halogen element ([0112],“ the second central atom 232 may include the silicon atom. Here, when the reactant includes oxygen or ozone, the target layer 240 may include hafnium silicate”; [0065], “The second ligand 54 may include a halogen atom such as fluoro, chloro, bromo, iodo, etc., a hydroxyl group, amine, an amine group having a carbon atom of about 1 to 10”), which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent, to the substrate (a possible embodiment would be for the second modifying agent to be a fluorosilane gas, which would be different than an embodiment of a pure halogen gas such as a pure bromine gas, which is an obvious embodiment for the first modifying agent); It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, absent unexpected results, before the date of effective filing, to incorporate the process of Lee into the program of Kihara in order to arrive at the expected result of using the program to perform a process with the benefit of improved control over the composition ratios of the processed substrate (see [0031] of Lee) with reasonable expectation of success. Kihara in view of Lee is silent with regards to (c) after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying a precursor containing the predetermined element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate. Wang teaches after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying a precursor containing the predetermined element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate ([0040], “the halogenated precursor includes a halogenated silane compound that can be represented by the formula H.sub.2n+2-ySi.sub.nX.sub.y”; A halogen silane gas, such as hexachlorodisilane can be used as a precursor to make way for the reactant step in the formation of the film). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, absent unexpected results, before the date of effective filing, to incorporate the halogen silane gas precursor step of Wang into the method of Kihara in view of Lee in order to arrive at the expected result of creating a fabrication method with the a gas compatible with the instant process, while also having the known benefit of the ease of purification associated with a volatile halogen silane gas with reasonable expectation of success. Kihara in view of Lee and in further view of Wang teaches (d) after (c), supplying a reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate (Lee [0068], “the reactant may include a compound having an oxygen atom and/or nitrogen atom. For example, the reactant may include ozone (O.sub.3), oxygen (O.sub.2), water vapor (H.sub.2O), an oxygen plasma, an ozone plasma, ammonia (NH.sub.3)”). Regarding Claim 20, Kihara teaches A substrate processing apparatus, but is silent with regards to that apparatus comprising: a first modifying agent supply system configured to supply a first modifying agent containing a first halogen element to a substrate including a recess formed on a surface of the substrate; a second modifying agent supply system configured to supply a second modifying agent containing a second halogen element, which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent, to the substrate; a precursor supply system configured to supply a precursor containing a predetermined element, which is different in molecular structure from a first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate; a reactant supply system configured to supply a reactant to the substrate; and a controller configured to be capable of controlling the first modifying agent supply system, the second modifying agent supply system, the precursor supply system, and the reactant supply system to perform a process including: forming a film containing the predetermined element over an inner surface of the recess by performing a cycle a predetermined number of times, the cycle including performing: (a) supplying the first modifying agent to the substrate; (b) supplying the second modifying agent to the substrate; (c) after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying the precursor to the substrate; and (d) after (c), supplying the reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate. Lee teaches apparatus comprising: a first modifying agent supply system configured to supply a first modifying agent (Fig. 2B, 30) containing a first halogen element ([0053], “, the first ligand 34 may include a halogen atom such as fluoro (F), chloro (Cl), bromo (Br), iodo (I), etc., a hydroxyl (OH) group, ammine (NH.sub.3)”) to a substrate including a recess formed on a surface of the substrate (Fig. 13, a film is seen formed on an inner surface of a recess); a second modifying agent supply system configured to supply a second modifying agent (Fig. 6D, 230) containing a second halogen element ([0112],“ the second central atom 232 may include the silicon atom. Here, when the reactant includes oxygen or ozone, the target layer 240 may include hafnium silicate”; [0065], “The second ligand 54 may include a halogen atom such as fluoro, chloro, bromo, iodo, etc., a hydroxyl group, amine, an amine group having a carbon atom of about 1 to 10”), which is different in molecular structure from the first modifying agent, to the substrate; a precursor supply system configured to supply a precursor containing a predetermined element([0117], “the isolation layer 302 may be formed on the substrate 300 using an oxide such as silicon oxide by a thermal oxidation process or a shallow trench isolation (STI) process.”), which is different in molecular structure from a first modifying agent and the second modifying agent, to the substrate (a possible embodiment would be for the second modifying agent to be a fluorosilane gas, which would be different than an embodiment of a pure halogen gas such as a pure bromine gas, which is an obvious embodiment for the first modifying agent); a reactant supply system configured to supply a reactant to the substrate (it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that a controller within the apparatus of Kihara would be motivated to configure a first and second modifying agent); and a controller configured to be capable of controlling the first modifying agent supply system, the second modifying agent supply system, to perform a process including: forming a film forming a film (Fig. 13, a film is seen formed on an inner surface of a recess) containing the predetermined element over an inner surface of the recess by performing a cycle a predetermined number of times ([0092], “when the target layer 140 having the predetermined thickness is formed by repeated application of the unit cycle, the introduction quantity of the first precursor 120 may be appropriately adjusted per the unit cycle to maintain the atomic number ratio”), the cycle including performing: (a) supplying a first modifying agent (Fig. 2B, 30) to the substrate; (b) supplying a second modifying agent (Fig. 6D, 230) to the substrate. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, absent unexpected results, before the date of effective filing, to undertake the substrate processing method of Wang using the apparatus of Khara in order to arrive at the expected result of fine-tuning substrate processing using a process with the benefit of improved control over the composition ratios of the processed substrate (see [0031] of Lee) with reasonable expectation of success. Kihara in view of Lee is silent with regards to (c) after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying the precursor to the substrate via a precursor supply system. Wang teaches (c) after starting (a) and (b), forming a deposited layer containing the predetermined element by supplying the precursor to the substrate via a precursor supply system ([0040], “the halogenated precursor includes a halogenated silane compound that can be represented by the formula H.sub.2n+2-ySi.sub.nX.sub.y”; A halogen silane gas, such as hexachlorodisilane can be used as a precursor to make way for the reactant step in the formation of the film). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, absent unexpected results, before the date of effective filing, to incorporate the halogen silane gas precursor step of Wang into the method of Kihara in view of Lee in order to arrive at the expected result of creating a fabrication method with the a gas compatible with the instant process, while also having the known benefit of the ease of purification associated with a volatile halogen silane gas with reasonable expectation of success. Kihara in view of Lee and Wang teaches a reactant supply system to (d) after (c), supplying the reactant, which reacts with the deposited layer, to the substrate (Lee [0068], “the reactant may include a compound having an oxygen atom and/or nitrogen atom. For example, the reactant may include ozone (O.sub.3), oxygen (O.sub.2), water vapor (H.sub.2O), an oxygen plasma, an ozone plasma, ammonia (NH.sub.3)”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICTOR J LASASSO whose telephone number is (703)756-5668. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at (571) 272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /V.J.L./Examiner, Art Unit 2898 /JESSICA S MANNO/SPE, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745575
SEMICONDUCTOR LAYER, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND TRANSISTOR COMPRISING SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12724310
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727328
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF PROVIDING THE SAME
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720803
FABRICATION OF GATE-ALL-AROUND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURES HAVING PRE-SPACER-DEPOSITION WIDE CUT GATES
5y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720834
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+0.8%)
3y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 46 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month