Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/608,005

SELECTIVE COBALT DEPOSITION ON COPPER SURFACES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
WALTERS JR, ROBERT S
Art Unit
1717
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
558 granted / 1085 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +51% interview lift
Without
With
+50.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
1148
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1085 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Status of Application Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 5, 19 and 20 are withdrawn. Claims 1-4 and 6-18 are presented for examination. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 1 in the reply filed on 11/25/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that a search of one species would yield references applicable to all the species. This is not found persuasive because the Examiner maintains that a search for a pretreatment using plasma is not likely to also yield prior art where the pretreatment is a thermal process. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 5, 19 and 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 11/25/2025. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 1. Claims 1-4 and 6-18 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-4 and 6-18 of U.S. Patent No. 11959167. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-4 and 6-18 of U.S. Pat. No. 11959167 anticipate claims 1-4 and 6-18. 2. Claims 1-4, 6, 9-13 and 16-18 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-4, 6, 9, 10 and 12-15 of U.S. Patent No. 11384429. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-4, 6, 9, 10 and 12-15 of U.S. Pat. No. 11384429 anticipate claims 1-4, 6, 9-13 and 16-18. Conclusion Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 5, 19 and 20 are withdrawn. Claims 1-4 and 6-18 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT S WALTERS JR whose telephone number is (571)270-5351. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dah-Wei Yuan can be reached at 571-272-1295. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT S WALTERS JR/ January 14, 2026Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1717
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Mar 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600870
NON-OXIDIZED GRAPHENE-BASED ANTI-VIRAL COATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603280
SULFUR CATHODES, SULFUR CATHODE MATERIALS, AND APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601047
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SELECTIVE DEPOSITION METHOD USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589410
FILM FORMING METHOD AND FILM FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590212
METHOD OF IMPROVING ACTINIC CURE OF ENERGY CURABLE INKS AND COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.8%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1085 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month