Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/613,476

NANOSTRUCTURE TRANSISTORS WITH OFFSET SOURCE/DRAIN DOPANT BLOCKING STRUCTURES INCLUDING A SUPERLATTICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 24, 2023 — provisional 63/492,038 +1 more
Examiner
PRASAD, NEIL R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Atomera Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
607 granted / 711 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
731
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 711 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Colombeau et al. (US Publication No. 2023/0040606) in view of Murakoshi et al. (US Publication No. 2017/0263613). Regarding claim 1, Colombeau discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate (102) a plurality of spaced apart gate stacks (106) on the substrate defining respective trenches (114) therebetween, each gate stack comprising alternating layers of first (108) and second semiconductor materials (110), the layers of the second semiconductor material defining nanostructures (paragraph 43) respective source/drain regions (120/122) within the trenches respective insulating regions (112) adjacent lateral ends of the layers of the first semiconductor material (108) While Colombeau does disclose a super lattice structure (106), Colombeau does not disclose respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends of the nanostructures and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions, each dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. However, Murakoshi discloses respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends of the nanostructures (6b) and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions (23), each dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers (16/17) defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer (15) constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions (16/17) (Figure 16B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the device of Colombeau to include respective dopant blocking superlattice layering adjacent to lateral ends of the nanostructures, as taught by Murakoshi, since it can provide improved electrostatic coupling and reduce negative effects such as parasitic capacitance and off-state leakage (paragraph 4). Regarding claim 2, Murakoshi discloses a respective semiconductor buffer layer (25) between each nanostructure (6b) and the adjacent dopant blocking superlattice (15/16/17). As explained above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Colombeau in view of Murakoshi. Regarding claim 3, Murakoshi discloses a respective lateral bottom dopant blocking superlattice between the substrate and the source/drain regions (Figures 133B and 135), each lateral bottom dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers (the lower most blocking pattern is between the substrate and part of the S/D region), each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion (16/17), and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer (15) constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions (16/17). Regarding claim 4, Colombeau discloses the first semiconductor material (106) comprises silicon germanium (paragraph 43). Regarding claim 5, Colombeau discloses the second semiconductor material (108) comprises silicon (paragraph 43). Regarding claim 6, Colombeau discloses the source/drain regions (120/122) comprise phosphorus doped silicon (Si:P) (paragraph 54). Regarding claim 7, Murakoshi discloses the base semiconductor monolayers (17) comprise silicon (HfSiON). As explained above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Colombeau in view of Murakoshi. Regarding claim 8, Murakoshi discloses the non-semiconductor monolayers (25) comprise oxygen (paragraph 163). As explained above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Colombeau in view of Murakoshi. Regarding claim 9, Colombeau discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate (102) a plurality of spaced apart gate stacks (106) on the substrate defining respective trenches (114) therebetween, each gate stack comprising alternating layers of first (108) and second semiconductor materials (110), the layers of the second semiconductor material defining nanostructures (paragraph 43) respective source/drain regions (120/122) within the trenches respective insulating regions (112) adjacent lateral ends of the layers of the first semiconductor material (108) While Colombeau does disclose a super lattice structure (106), Colombeau does not disclose a respective buffer layer between each nanostructure and dopant blocking superlattice, and respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends and a bottom dopant blocking superlattice between the substrate and source/drain regions of the nanostructures and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions, each dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions. However, Murakoshi discloses a respective buffer layer (25) between each nanostructure (6b) and dopant blocking superlattice (15/16/17) (Figure 16B), and respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends and a bottom dopant blocking superlattice between the substrate and source/drain regions of the nanostructures (6b) and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions (23), each dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers (16/17) defining a base silicon portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer (15) constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions (16/17) (Figure 16B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the device of Colombeau to include respective dopant blocking superlattice layering adjacent to lateral ends of the nanostructures, as taught by Murakoshi, since it can provide improved electrostatic coupling and reduce negative effects such as parasitic capacitance and off-state leakage (paragraph 4). Regarding claim 10, Colombeau discloses the first semiconductor material (106) comprises silicon germanium (paragraph 43). Regarding claim 11, Colombeau discloses the second semiconductor material (108) comprises silicon (paragraph 43). Regarding claim 12, Colombeau discloses the source/drain regions (120/122) comprise phosphorus doped silicon (Si:P) (paragraph 54). Regarding claim 13, Murakoshi discloses the base semiconductor monolayers (17) comprise silicon (HfSiON). As explained above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Colombeau in view of Murakoshi. Regarding claim 14, Murakoshi discloses the non-semiconductor monolayers (25) comprise oxygen (paragraph 163). As explained above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Colombeau in view of Murakoshi. Regarding claim 15, Colombeau discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate (102) a plurality of spaced apart gate stacks (106) on the substrate defining respective trenches (114) therebetween, each gate stack comprising alternating layers of first (108) and second semiconductor materials (110), the layers of the second semiconductor material defining nanostructures (paragraph 43) respective source/drain regions (120/122) within the trenches respective insulating regions (112) adjacent lateral ends of the layers of the first semiconductor material (108) While Colombeau does disclose a super lattice structure (106), Colombeau does not disclose respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends of the nanostructures and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions, each dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. However, Murakoshi discloses respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends of the nanostructures (6b) and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions (23), each dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers (16/17) defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer (15) constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions (16/17) (Figure 16B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the device of Colombeau to include respective dopant blocking superlattice layering adjacent to lateral ends of the nanostructures, as taught by Murakoshi, since it can provide improved electrostatic coupling and reduce negative effects such as parasitic capacitance and off-state leakage (paragraph 4). Regarding claim 16, Murakoshi discloses a respective semiconductor buffer layer (25) between each nanostructure (106) and the adjacent dopant blocking superlattice. As explained above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Colombeau in view of Murakoshi. Regarding claim 17, Murakoshi discloses a respective lateral bottom dopant blocking superlattice between the substrate and the source/drain regions (Figures 133B and 135), each lateral bottom dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers (the lower most blocking pattern is between the substrate and part of the S/D region), each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion (16/17), and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer (15) constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions (16/17). Regarding claim 18, Colombeau discloses the first semiconductor material (106) comprises silicon germanium (paragraph 43). Regarding claim 19, Colombeau discloses the second semiconductor material (108) comprises silicon (paragraph 43). Regarding claim 20, Colombeau discloses the source/drain regions (120/122) comprise phosphorus doped silicon (Si:P) (paragraph 54). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Morooka (US Publication No. 2023/0200060) discloses dopant blocking superlattice structures (SST) adjacent to nanostructure (Figure 4). Rubin discloses nanosheet blocking layers (270) adjacent to a nanostructure (Figure 5). More et al. (US Publication No. 2023/0012054) discloses boron doped silicon regions (218) adjacent to silicon layers (Figure 2E). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NEIL R PRASAD whose telephone number is (571) 270-3129. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at (469) 295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.R.P/ 6/20/2026 Examiner, Art Unit 2897 /JACOB Y CHOI/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685211
ELECTRONIC PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672557
CHIP HIGH-DENSITY INTERCONNECTION PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672523
System and Method for Die Crack Detection in Wafer-to-Wafer Bonding
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666988
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE ASSEMBLIES WITH CAVITY-EMBEDDED CUBES AND LOGIC-SUPPORTING INTERPOSERS
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666970
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 711 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month