Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/618,967

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Priority
Aug 21, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0109028
Examiner
CHANG, JAY C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
564 granted / 663 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
697
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 663 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/27/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in the Republic of Korea on 8/21/2023. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the KR10-2023-0109028 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Han et al. (US 2022/0165815 A1, hereinafter “Han”). Regarding independent claim 1, Figures 1-6 of Han disclose a display device comprising: a support substrate 101 (“substrate”- ¶0058) including a main area including a display area AA (“display area”- ¶0053) in which light emitting areas are arranged, a hole area CH (“hole”- ¶0053) surrounded by the main area, and a hole peripheral area (i.e., the area around CH) between the hole area CH and the main area; a circuit layer (i.e., collectively the layers between 101 and 150) on the support substrate 101; an element layer 150 (“light emitting element”- ¶0071) on the circuit layer; a capping layer 171 (“insulating film”- ¶0078) on the element layer 150; an encapsulation substrate 173 (“insulating film”- ¶0078) on the capping layer 171 and bonded to the support substrate 101; a first hole peripheral dam 301 (“dam”- ¶0080) in the hole peripheral area and surrounding a periphery of the hole area CH; a second hole peripheral dam 302 (“dam”- ¶0080) in the hole peripheral area and surrounding a periphery of the first hole peripheral dam 301; and an auxiliary dam 214 (“structure”- ¶0082) in a valley area of the hole peripheral area between the first hole peripheral dam 301 and the second hole peripheral dam 302. Regarding claim 2, Figures 1-6 of Han disclose wherein the second hole peripheral dam 302 is adjacent to the main area, and the auxiliary dam 214 is closer to the second hole peripheral dam 302 among the first hole peripheral dam 301 and the second hole peripheral dam 302. Regarding claim 3, Figures 1-6 of Han disclose wherein the first hole peripheral dam 301 is arranged in a ring shape surrounding the periphery of the hole area CH, the auxiliary dam 214 is arranged in a ring shape surrounding the periphery of the first hole peripheral dam 301, and the second hole peripheral dam 302 is arranged in a ring shape surrounding a periphery of the auxiliary dam 214. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 4, the prior art of record including Han, either singularly or in combination, does not disclose or suggest the combination of limitations including, but not limited to, “wherein the auxiliary dam includes dot-shaped pillars arranged along the periphery of the first hole peripheral dam and spaced apart from each other”. Regarding claim 5 (which claims 6-11 depend from), the prior art of record including Han, either singularly or in combination, does not disclose or suggest the combination of limitations including, but not limited to, “[the] display device… further comprising: a light transmitting hole in the hole area and penetrating through the circuit layer, the element layer, and the capping layer; and a hole filling layer in an area surrounded by the first hole peripheral dam and filling the light transmitting hole”. Claims 12-20 are allowed. Regarding independent claim 12, Figures 1-6 of Han disclose a display device comprising: a support substrate 101 (“substrate”- ¶0058) including a main area including a display area AA (“display area”- ¶0053) in which light emitting areas are arranged, a hole area CH (“hole”- ¶0053) surrounded by the main area, and a hole peripheral area (i.e., the area around CH) between the hole area CH and the main area; a circuit layer (i.e., collectively the layers between 101 and 150) on the support substrate 101; an element layer 150 (“light emitting element”- ¶0071) on the circuit layer; a capping layer 171 (“insulating film”- ¶0078) on the element layer 150; an encapsulation substrate 173 (“insulating film”- ¶0078) on the capping layer 171 and bonded to the support substrate 101; a first hole peripheral dam 301 (“dam”- ¶0080) in the hole peripheral area and surrounding a periphery of the hole area CH; a second hole peripheral dam 302 (“dam”- ¶0080) in the hole peripheral area and surrounding a periphery of the first hole peripheral dam 301; and an auxiliary dam 214 (“structure”- ¶0082) in a valley area of the hole peripheral area between the first hole peripheral dam 301 and the second hole peripheral dam 302. Han does not expressly disclose a light transmitting hole in the hole area and penetrating through the circuit layer, the element layer, and the capping layer, and a hole filling layer in an area surrounded by the first hole peripheral dam and filling the light transmitting hole. Thus, regarding independent claim 12, the claim is allowed, because the prior art of record including Han, either singularly or in combination, does not disclose or suggest the combination of limitations including, but not limited to, “a light transmitting hole in the hole area and penetrating through the circuit layer, the element layer, and the capping layer” and “a hole filling layer in an area surrounded by the first hole peripheral dam and filling the light transmitting hole”. Claims 13-20 are allowed as being dependent on allowed claim 12. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Han et al. (US 2023/0146897 A1), which discloses a display device comprising multiple dam structures surrounding a hole area. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY C CHANG whose telephone number is (571)272-6132. The examiner can normally be reached Mon- Fri 12pm-10pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos-Feliciano can be reached at (571)-272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY C CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685099
Method of Multi-layer Die Stacking with Die-to-Wafer Bonding
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685069
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE, PICK AND PLACE DEVICE, AND WORKPIECE HANDLING APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12660672
ANTENNA PACKAGE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642101
Semiconductor Device and Method of Forming High Crystal Quality Magnetic Layer for Shielding of Low Frequency Magnetic Fields
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628697
PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 663 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month