Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/634,539

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPACT RESISTANT AND PHOTOVOLTAIC WINDOWS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Priority
Aug 11, 2015 — provisional 62/203,709 +4 more
Examiner
KWONG, CHO YIU
Art Unit
3693
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
37%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allowance Rate
106 granted / 330 resolved
-19.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
379
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§103
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 330 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Non-Final Office Action is in response to the application filed on 04/12/2024 and the Amendment & Remark filed on 03/12/2026 and the Request for Continued Examination filed on 04/10/2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/10/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7- 12, 14-18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Steven et al (US 2014/0039965) in view of Peterson et al (US 2007/0137141) in view of Lewis et al. (US 2009/0088907) As per claim 1, Steven teaches a system comprising: an electrical component coupled to at least one PV device and configured to collect, from the at least one PV device an electrical output generated by the at least one PV device; (See Steven Paragraph 0101 and 0122) a controller communicatively coupled to the electrical component, the controller configured to generate, based, at least in part, upon the collected electrical output, a solar profile of a structure including at least one PV device, (See Steven Paragraph 0101 and 0122) at least one computing device comprising at least one processor and at least one memory device, the at least one computing device communicatively coupled to the controller and configured to: receive, from the controller, the solar profile; and display, on a user interface of the at least one computing device, one or more notifications including the solar profile. (See Steven Paragraph 0101, 0144, 0122, 0138 and 0225, the solar profile include energy generation from photovoltaic (PV) power generation, which is information representing the environment sounding the structure.) Steven does not teach that PV is Impact Resistant Photovoltaic Window. However, Peterson teaches Photovoltaic window that has impact resistance quality. (See Peterson Paragraph 0005, 0020 and 0021) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the energy profile generating system taught by Steven with teaching from Peterson to generate an energy profile of IRPV window. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated as analyzing the energy output of IRPV window increases the system’s applicability. Steven in view of Peterson does not explicitly teach displaying one or more notification including weather data associated with weather surrounding the structure and at least one account updated associated with the structure. However, Lewis teaches displaying, on an interface, weather conditions surrounding a structure, total power consumption and saving data. (See Lewis Paragraph 0039-0040, power consumption and energy saving teaches account updated associated with the structure.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the energy profile generating system taught by Steven in view of Peter with teaching from Lewis to display information including surrounding weather and account update. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated as display additional relevant provide additional insight for customer decisioning. As per claim 8, Steven teaches a method comprising: generating, by the controller based, at least in part, upon the collected electrical output, the solar profile of the structure including the at least one PV device; (See Steven Paragraph 0101, 0144, 0122 and 0138) interconnecting the at least one computing device to the controller, wherein the at least one computing device is configured to (i) receive, from the controller, the solar profile, and (ii) display, on a user interface of the at least one computing device, one or more notifications including the solar profile. (See Steven Paragraph 0101, 0144, 0122, 0138 and 0225, the solar profile include energy generation from photovoltaic (PV) power generation, which is information representing the environment sounding the structure.) Steven does not teach that PV is Impact Resistant Photovoltaic Window. However, Peterson teaches Photovoltaic window that has impact resistance quality. (See Peterson Paragraph 0005, 0020 and 0021) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the energy profile generating system taught by Steven with teaching from Peterson to generate an energy profile of IRPV window. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated as analyzing the energy output of IRPV window increases the system’s applicability. Steven in view of Peterson does not explicitly teach displaying one or more notification including weather data associated with weather surrounding the structure and at least one account updated associated with the structure. However, Lewis teaches displaying, on an interface, weather conditions surrounding a structure, total power consumption and saving data. (See Lewis Paragraph 0039-0040, power consumption and energy saving teaches account updated associated with the structure.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the energy profile generating system taught by Steven in view of Peter with teaching from Lewis to display information including surrounding weather and account update. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated as display additional relevant provide additional insight for customer decisioning. As per claim 15, Steven teaches non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions embodied when executed by a controller, the computer-executable instructions cause the controller to: generating, by the controller based, at least in part, upon the collected electrical output, the solar profile of the structure including the at least one PV device; (See Steven Paragraph 0101, 0144, 0122 and 0138) interconnecting the at least one computing device to the controller, wherein the at least one computing device is configured to (i) receive, from the controller, the solar profile, and (ii) display, on a user interface of the at least one computing device, one or more notifications including the solar profile. (See Steven Paragraph 0101, 0144, 0122, 0138 and 0225, the solar profile include energy generation from photovoltaic (PV) power generation, which is information representing the environment sounding the structure.) Steven does not teach that PV is Impact Resistant Photovoltaic Window. However, Peterson teaches Photovoltaic window that has impact resistance quality. (See Peterson Paragraph 0005, 0020 and 0021) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the energy profile generating system taught by Steven with teaching from Peterson to generate an energy profile of IRPV window. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated as analyzing the energy output of IRPV window increases the system’s applicability. Steven in view of Peterson does not explicitly teach displaying one or more notification including weather data associated with weather surrounding the structure and at least one account updated associated with the structure. However, Lewis teaches displaying, on an interface, weather conditions surrounding a structure, total power consumption and saving data. (See Lewis Paragraph 0039-0040, power consumption and energy saving teaches account updated associated with the structure.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify the energy profile generating system taught by Steven in view of Peter with teaching from Lewis to display information including surrounding weather and account update. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated as display additional relevant provide additional insight for customer decisioning. As per claims 2 and 9, Steven in view of Peterson in view of Lewis teaches: wherein the electrical component is electrically coupled to an energy output of the at least one IRPV window. (See Steven Paragraph 0480 and Peterson Paragraph 0005, 0020 and 0021) As per claims 3, 10 and 16, Steven in view of Peterson in view of Lewis teaches: wherein the electrical component is further configured to collect the electrical output from the energy output of the at least one IRPV window. (See Steven Paragraph 0480 and Peterson Paragraph 0005, 0020 and 0021) As per claims 4, 11 and 17, Steven in view of Peterson in view of Lewis teaches: wherein the electrical component includes an inverter. (See Steven Paragraph 0480) As per claims 5, 12 and 18, Steven in view of Peterson in view of Lewis teaches: wherein the computing device is configured to receive the solar profile of the structure, wherein the solar profile indicates the electrical output of the at least one IRPV window. (See Steven Paragraph 0480 and Peterson Paragraph 0005, 0020 and 0021) As per claims 7, 14 and 20, Steven in view of Peterson in view of Lewis teaches: wherein the controller is further configured to communicate with a user computing device, and cause the solar profile to be displayed on a user interface of the user computing device. (See Steven Paragraph 0300) Claim Objections Claims 6, 13 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the previous rejection under 35 USC 103 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHO KWONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7955. The examiner can normally be reached 9am - 5pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL W ANDERSON can be reached at 571-270-0508. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHO YIU KWONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 14, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 16, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12657560
DYNAMIC QUICK LINK GENERATION SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12561747
PROCESSING INSURED ITEMS HOLISTICALLY WITH MOBILE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND CLAIMS PROCESSING
1y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12530718
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LOAN REWARDS PROVISIONING
1y 9m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12530720
TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
1y 3m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12488340
Address Verification, Seed Splitting and Firmware Extension for Secure Cryptocurrency Key Backup, Restore, and Transaction Signing Platform Apparatuses, Methods and Systems
3y 7m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
37%
With Interview (+4.7%)
4y 1m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 330 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month