Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/640,236

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING BIT LINE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Examiner
PARK, SAMUEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NANYA TECHNOLOGY Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
409 granted / 484 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 484 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 2. Applicant’s amendment to the claims, filed on August 22, 2021, is acknowledged. Entry of amendment is accepted and made of record. Response to Arguments/Remarks 3. Applicant’s arguments/remarks, see pgs. 4-9, with respect to the immediate allowance of the current application have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Pertaining to the Applicant’s arguments/remarks, pgs. 4-9, regarding the newly amended limitations and added claims: The Examiner notes that new combination of prior art are presented in light of the amendments such that arguments directed solely to the previously presented prior art are now moot. Note by the Examiner 4. For clarity, the reference to specific claim numbers are presented in bold. Cited claim limitations are presented in bold the first time they are associated with a particular prior art disclosing the cited limitations, and subsequent reference to the already disclosed claim limitations are presented un-bolded. Certain elements from prior art which are not required by the claims are also presented un-bolded if they are particularly pertinent to understanding how the references are being combined. Item-to-item matching and Examiner explanations for 102 &/or 103 rejections have been provided in parenthesis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. PNG media_image1.png 1067 814 media_image1.png Greyscale 5. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Kim (US 2018/0040560 A1), hereinafter as K1, in view of Lee et al. (US 2024/0349491 A1), hereinafter as L1, in view of Koo et al. (US 2016/0365279 A1), hereinafter as K2 6. Regarding Claim 1, K1 discloses a semiconductor device (see in particular Figs. 1A-C, “Labeled Fig. 1B” above, and [0010] “semiconductor memory device”), comprising: a substrate (element 100, see [0021] “substrate 100”) having a first recess region (labeled element “First Recess Region”, see [0026] “recess region 111”); and a first bit line structure (element BLS and SS within labeled element “First Recess Region”, see [0026] “bit line structures BLS” and [0038] “spacer structure SS”) in the first recess region (see “Labeled Fig. 1B” above); wherein the first bit line structure has a first spacer (element 131, see [0040] “first and second spacers 131 and 135”), a second spacer (element 135, see [0040]), and a third spacer (element 139, see [0039] “third spacer 139”). K1 does not explicitly disclose wherein the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer have different materials. L1 discloses wherein the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer have different materials (see Fig. 3A first spacer element LS see [0034] “The line spacer LS may be formed of or include at least one of … silicon oxycarbide (SiOC), or silicon oxycarbonitride (SiOCN)”, the second spacer element INS see [0048] “The inner spacer INS may be formed of or include at least one of silicon oxide (SiO2)”, and the third spacer element OUS see [0052] “The outer spacer OUS may be formed of or include at least one of … silicon nitride (SiN)”). The bit line multilayer spacer as taught by L1 is incorporated as the bit line multilayer spacer of K1. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to incorporate the teachings of L1 with K1 because the combination is simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results – simple substitution of one known bit line multilayer spacer material in a similar device for another to obtain predictable results (see L1 Fig. 3A and [0034, 0048, 0052] each of the spacers are described with a list of material which can be selected and substituted). K1, L1 do not explicitly disclose wherein top ends of the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer are coplanar with each other. K2 discloses wherein top ends of the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer are coplanar with each other (see Fig. 2 top surfaces of elements 51, 55, 56 surrounding the bit line structure element 60 have coplanar top ends, see [0062] “sixth spacers 56, upper surfaces of the fifth spacers 55, upper surfaces of the first spacers 51”, [0055] “interconnection contact patterns 42 may be bit line contacts of a memory device”). The planar shape of the top ends of the first, second, and third spacers as taught by K2 is incorporated as the shape of the top ends of the spacers of K1, L1. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to incorporate the teachings of K2 with K1, L1 because the combination is simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results – simple substitution of one known spacers top surface shape for another in a similar device for another to obtain predictable results (see K2 Fig. 2). 7. Regarding Claim 2, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the first bit line structure contacts a first doped region in the substrate (see K1 element 1a below element “First Recess Region”, see [0025] “first and second impurity regions 1a and 1b”). 8. Regarding Claim 3, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein a sidewall of the first recess region is inclined with respect to the substrate (see K1 “Labeled Fig. 1B”). 9. Regarding Claim 4, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the first spacer includes a carbon-containing material (see L1 [0034] “The line spacer LS may be formed of or include at least one of … silicon oxycarbide (SiOC), or silicon oxycarbonitride (SiOCN)”). 10. Regarding Claim 5, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the second spacer is disposed between the first spacer and the third spacer (see L1 Fig. 3A), and a first dielectric constant of the first spacer is less than a second dielectric constant of the second spacer (see L1 [0034] “The line spacer LS may be formed of or include at least one of … silicon oxycarbide (SiOC), or silicon oxycarbonitride (SiOCN)” and see [0052] “The outer spacer OUS may be formed of or include at least one of … silicon nitride (SiN)”). 11. Regarding Claim 6, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the first spacer is disposed in the first recess region (see K1 Fig. 2B for a detailed view the first spacer element 131 is in the first recess region – the material is combined with L1). 12. Regarding Claim 7, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 6, wherein the first spacer extends between the first bit line structure and a sidewall of the first recess region (see K1 Fig. 2B for a detailed view). 13. Regarding Claim 8, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising: a second recess region (see K1 “Labeled Fig. 1B” above, labeled element “Second Recess Region” of element 153) in the substrate and adjacent to the first recess region. 14. Regarding Claim 9, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 8, further comprising: a storage node contact (see K1 element 153 in labeled element “Second Recess Region”, see [0031] “contact conductive pad 153”; also see electrical connection above through element CPS to the data storage pattern element DSP) in the second recess region. 15. Regarding Claim 10, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 9, wherein the first spacer contacts the storage node contact (see K1 Fig. 2B for a detailed view element 131 is in contact with element 153 – the material is combined with L1). 16. Regarding Claim 11, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 9, wherein the storage node contact contacts a second doped region in the substrate (see K1 element 1b below the labeled element “Second Recess Region”, see [0025] “second impurity region 1b”). 17. Regarding Claim 12, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 9, wherein a bottom surface of the first recess region is lower than the storage node contact with respect to the substrate (see K1 “Labeled Fig. 1B” above). 18. Regarding Claim 13, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising (see K1 “Labeled Fig. 1B” above): a second bit line structure (element BLS over element 110) disposed over the substrate, wherein the first spacer extends between the first bit line structure and the second bit line structure (see “Labeled Fig. 1B above”). 19. Regarding Claim 14, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 13, wherein the second bit line structure is spaced apart from the substrate by an interlayer (see K1 element 110, see [0032] “insulating interlayer 110”). 20. Regarding Claim 15, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 13, wherein the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the first bit line structure are connected to the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the second bit line structure respectively (see K1 Fig. 1B). 21. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Kim (US 2018/0040560 A1), hereinafter as K1, in view of Lee et al. (US 2024/0349491 A1), hereinafter as L1, in view of Koo et al. (US 2016/0365279 A1), hereinafter as K2, in view of Song et al. (US 2018/0174971 A1), hereinafter as S1 22. Regarding Claim 16, K1, L1, K2 disclose the semiconductor device of claim 13, further comprising: a storage node (see K1 element 153) positioned between the first bit line structure and the second bit line structure. K1, L1, K2 do not explicitly disclose wherein the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the first bit line structure contact the storage node while the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the second bit line structure contact the storage node, such that the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the first bit line structure are separated from the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the second bit line structure by the storage node. S1 discloses wherein the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the first bit line structure contact the storage node while the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the second bit line structure contact the storage node, such that the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the first bit line structure are separated from the first spacer, the second spacer, and the third spacer of the second bit line structure by the storage node (see Fig. 2A each of the three spacer elements SP1, ASP, SP2 on each side of and in contact with the storage node element BC such that they are separated by the element BC). The storage node side ends of the three spacers as taught by S1 is incorporated as storage node side ends of the three spacers of K1, L1, K2. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to incorporate the teachings of S1 with K1 because the combination is simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results – simple substitution of one known storage node side end shape of the three bit line spacers in a similar device for another to obtain predictable results (S1 Fig. 2A). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL PARK whose telephone number is (303)297-4277. The examiner can normally be reached Normal Schedule: M-F Sometime between 6:30 a.m. - 7:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven H. Loke can be reached on (571) 272-1657. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL PARK/Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745390
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740332
CARBON FILM INTEGRATED INTO A BACK END OF LINE PROCESS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740069
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733185
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733199
GATE RESISTANCE REDUCTION THROUGH LOW-RESISTIVITY CONDUCTIVE LAYER
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.1%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 484 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month