Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/650,805

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH DECREASED SOURCE AND DRAIN RESISTANCE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Priority
Aug 21, 2023 — CN 202311051884.9
Examiner
ENAD, CHRISTINE A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Chinese Academy of Sciences
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1149 granted / 1361 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1398
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
64.5%
+24.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1361 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (Claims 1-9) in the reply filed on 9/1/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 10 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 9/1/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iwai et al (US Publication No. 2023/0232624) in view of Lee et al (US Publication No. 2022/0093532). Regarding claim 1, Iwai discloses a semiconductor device with decreased source and drain resistance, comprising: a substrate Fig 7A, 10; and a plurality of three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays Fig 12A, wherein the three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays are provided on the substrate Fig 12A, and the three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays are separated by isolation grooves Fig 6A, 41/43 wherein each of the three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays comprises a plurality of device layers in a vertical direction Fig 7A, each of the device layers Fig 19A-19B comprises a stack of a source/drain layer Fig 12A, 19A-19B, a channel layer and a source/drain layer Fig 12A, 19A-19B, and wherein the three-dimensional semiconductor device array further comprises a plurality of gate stacks arranged in an array Fig 12A, 17-19B, the gate stack penetrates each of the device layers in the vertical direction and comprises a gate material and a gate dielectric layer provided between the gate material and the device layer ¶0099-0101, and a device unit is defined at an intersection of the gate stack and the device layer Fig 12A, 17-19B. Iwai discloses all the limitations but silent on the isolation groove. Whereas Lee discloses a semiconductor device with decreased source and drain resistance, comprising: a substrate Fig 25, Sub; and a plurality of three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays Fig 19, wherein the three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays are provided on the substrate Fig 19 ¶0130-0132, and the three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays are separated by isolation grooves Fig 25, SPC1; wherein each of the three-dimensional semiconductor device arrays comprises a plurality of device layers in a vertical direction, each of the device layers Fig 20-25 comprises a stack of a source/drain layer, a channel layer and a source/drain layer, and an end face of the source/drain layer ¶0110-0111 adjacent to the isolation groove is metallized to form a silicide Fig 26 ¶0159-0160; and wherein the three-dimensional semiconductor device array further comprises a plurality of gate stacks arranged in an array Fig 21-26. Iwai and Lee are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Iwai because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill of the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Iwai and incorporate the teachings of Lee to improve device insulation. Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses wherein the source/drain layer and the channel layer in each of the device layers extend in a direction in which the isolation groove extends Fig 21-26, While Iwai discloses a staircase like contact region is formed at the source/drain layer Fig 12A, 17-19B. Regarding claim 3, Iwai discloses wherein a silicon dioxide is deposited on the three-dimensional semiconductor device array to form a dielectric isolation layer ¶0061, 0115 which covers a contact region and an upper surface of the three-dimensional semiconductor device array as well as each isolation groove, and an upper surface of the dielectric isolation layer is flattened Fig 17. Regarding claim 4, Iwai discloses wherein vertically etching is performed downwards from the upper surface of the dielectric isolation layer to form a plurality of contact holes, and each of the contact holes extends to the contact region of the source/drain layer Fig 9A. Regarding claim 5, Iwai discloses wherein a lower source/drain layer in an upper device layer and an upper source/drain layer in a lower device layer adjacent to the upper device layer are the same source/drain layer Fig 19A-19C. Regarding claim 6, Iwai discloses wherein a silicon dioxide isolation layer is provided between two source/drain layers of each device layer and at a bottom of the three-dimensional semiconductor device array; wherein a bottom of the gate stack is located in the silicon dioxide isolation layer at the bottom of the three-dimensional semiconductor device array; and wherein the channel layer is provided between the gate dielectric layer and a structure formed by the two source/drain layers and the silicon dioxide isolation layer Fig 12A, 17-19B. Regarding claim 7, Lee discloses wherein each of the source/drain layer and the channel layer is made of a doped polycrystalline silicon material ¶0047. Regarding claim 8, Iwai discloses wherein an upper surface of the substrate is provided with a silicon germanium layer ¶0046; wherein a bottom of the gate stack is located in the silicon germanium layer; wherein the source/drain layer, the channel layer and the source/drain layer in the device layer are stacked sequentially from bottom to top; wherein a bottom of the isolation groove is located in the silicon germanium layer; and wherein a dielectric inner spacer is formed at each of an end face of the channel layer adjacent to the isolation groove and an end face of the silicon germanium layer adjacent to the isolation groove Fig 12A, 17-19B.. Regarding claim 9, Iwai and Lee disclose wherein the source/drain layer is made of a heavily doped silicon material, and the channel layer is made of a silicon germanium material Iwai ¶0106, 0134-0135 Lee ¶0047. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE A ENAD whose telephone number is (571)270-7891. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30 am -4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571 272 1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE A ENAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751029
STRUCTURE AND FORMATION METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH POWER RAIL
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751039
CONTACT STRUCTURE WITH ARCHED TOP SURFACE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745413
SYSTEM AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745414
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733200
NON-EPITAXIAL ELECTRICAL COUPLING BETWEEN A FRONT SIDE TRENCH CONNECTOR AND BACK SIDE CONTACTS OF A TRANSISTOR
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.3%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1361 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month