Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/667,148

MICROWAVE PLASMA-ENHANCED DEPOSITION OF SILICON OXIDE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 17, 2024
Examiner
CHIN, EDWARD
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
616 granted / 705 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
726
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 705 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action This office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 05/17/24. Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Claim Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. §103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103 as being unpatentable over Xu (CN114622183), and further in view of Cho (US 20190272999 A1). Regarding claim 1, Xu discloses a method comprising: exposing a semiconductor substrate to a silicon-containing precursor and an oxygen-containing plasma to deposit a silicon oxide (SiOx) film, wherein the oxygen-containing plasma is a microwave plasma generated by a microwave plasma source (see claims 1 and 4 disclosing microwave plasma forming silicon oxide film). However, Xu does not explicitly disclose: a microwave plasma source including a plasma showerhead assembly comprising a conductive plate and a dielectric faceplate, a plurality of resonator openings through the conductive plate, and a dielectric resonator in each of the plurality of resonator openings. However, Cho is directed towards process chamber features and at least at fig 6 discloses a microwave plasma source including a plasma showerhead assembly comprising a conductive plate (see para [0039] disclosing conductive) and a dielectric faceplate (see para [0081]), a plurality of resonator openings through the conductive plate (see fig 6a), and a dielectric resonator in each of the plurality of resonator openings (see fig 6 disclosing openings and para [0090] disclosing resonance.) Xu and Cho are in the same or similar fields of endeavor. It would have been obvious to on having ordinary skill in the art at a time prior to the effective filing date of the present application to combine Xu with Cho. Xu and Cho may be combined by forming the conductive face plate and dielectric layer of Cho in the device of Xu. One having ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to combine Xu and Cho in order to perform plasma treatment. Regarding claim 2, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 1, performed at a temperature in a range of from 100 °C to 700 °C (see claim 3 disclosing 500c). Regarding claim 3, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 1, comprising a plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) process (see claim 1 disclosing plasma enhanced ald). Regarding claim 4, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 1, wherein the oxygen-containing plasma comprises one or more of oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), or nitrous oxide (N2O) (see claim 5 disclosing oxygen species). Regarding claim 5, Xu and Cho disclose at least at para [0010], discloses the method of claim 1, comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to the silicon-containing precursor for a time period in a range of from 0.1 seconds to 60 seconds ( see para [0010], 0-20ms). Regarding claim 6, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 1, comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to the oxygen-containing plasma for a time period in a range of from 0.1 seconds to 120 seconds (see para [0010], 0-20ms). Regarding claim 7, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 1, further comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to a treatment plasma(see para [0010], 0-20ms, treatment plasma). Regarding claim 8, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 7, wherein the treatment plasma is a microwave plasma generated by a microwave plasma source(see claims 1 and 4 disclosing microwave plasma forming silicon oxide film). Regarding claim 9, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 7, wherein the treatment plasma comprises oxygen (O2) and one or more of nitrogen (N2), argon (Ar), or helium (He) (see claim 5 disclosing oxygen and N2). Regarding claim 10, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 9, wherein the treatment plasma consists essentially of oxygen (O2) and nitrogen (N2) (see claim 5 disclosing oxygen and N2). Regarding claim 11, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 9, wherein the treatment plasma consists essentially of oxygen (O2) and argon (Ar) (see claim 5 disclosing oxygen and Ar). Regarding claim 12, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 9, wherein the treatment plasma consists essentially of oxygen (O2) and helium (He) (see claim 5 disclosing oxygen and He). Regarding claim 13, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 7, comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to the treatment plasma for a time period in a range of from 0.1 seconds to 120 seconds(see para [0010], 0-20ms). Regarding claim 14, Xu and Cho disclose, at least at fig 1, the method of claim 1, wherein the semiconductor substrate comprises at least one feature, the at least one feature defining a trench having a top surface, a bottom surface, and two sidewalls (see fig 1 disclosing trenches with features). Regarding claim 15, Xu and Cho disclose a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: exposing a semiconductor substrate to a silicon-containing precursor (see claim 1 disclosing silicon oxide source) and an oxygen-containing plasma to deposit a silicon oxide (SiOx) film (see claim 1 disclosing SiOx film)wherein the oxygen-containing plasma comprises one or more of oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), or nitrous oxide (N2O) (see claims 1, 3, 5, disclosing laughing gas), the oxygen-containing plasma is a microwave plasma generated by a microwave plasma source, and the method is performed at a temperature in a range of from 100 °C to 700 °C (see para [0045] and claim 4, claim 3 disclosing 500c). Regarding claim 16, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 15, comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to the silicon-containing precursor for a time period in a range of from 0.1 seconds to 60 seconds and exposing the semiconductor substrate to the oxygen-containing plasma for a time period in a range of from 0.1 seconds to 120 seconds (see para [0010], 0-20ms). Regarding claim 17, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 15, further comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to a treatment plasma, the treatment plasma comprising a microwave plasma including oxygen (O2) and one or more of nitrogen (N2), argon (Ar), or helium (He) (see claim 5 disclosing N2, Ar or He). Regarding claim 18, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 17, comprising exposing the semiconductor substrate to the treatment plasma for a time period in a range of from 0.1 seconds to 120 seconds (see para [0010], 0-20ms). Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103 as being unpatentable over Xu and Cho as applied to claim 15 and further in view of Suzuki (US 20230343587 A). Regarding claim 19, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 15, but does not explicitly disclose wherein the semiconductor device includes a 3D-NAND structure. However, Suzuki, at least at para [0002] discloses 3d-NAND. Xu, Cho and Suzuki are in the same or similar fields of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at a time prior to the effective filing date of the present application to combine Xu and Cho with Suzuki. Xu, Cho and Suzuki may be combined by forming the device of Xu and Cho into a memory device disclosed in Suzuki. One having ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to combine Xu and Cho and Suzuki in order to form a memory device. Regarding claim 20, Xu and Cho disclose the method of claim 15, and Suzuki further discloses wherein the semiconductor device includes a dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) structure (see para 40 disclosing memory). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at a time prior to the effective filing date of the present application to combine Xu and Cho with Suzuki. Xu, Cho and Suzuki may be combined by forming the device of Xu and Cho into a memory device disclosed in Suzuki. One having ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to combine Xu, Cho and Suzuki in order to form a memory device. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD CHIN whose telephone number is (571)270-1827. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached at (571) 270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD CHIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 09, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772598
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRING PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764978
PATTERNING A FUNCTIONAL LAYER BY MEANS OF A SACRIFICIAL LAYER AND PREPARING A MIM CAPACITOR IMPLEMENTING SAID PATTERNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757390
ANTIFUSES CAPABLE OF FORMING LOCALIZED CONDUCTIVE LINKS
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751272
MEMORY DEVICE HAVING 2-TRANSISTOR VERTICAL MEMORY CELL AND A COMMON PLATE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750998
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 705 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month