DETAILED ACTION
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Election/Restriction
Applicant’s election without traverse of species (b) in the reply filed on 2/02/26 is acknowledged.
Claim Objections
Applicant is advised that should claim 18 be found allowable, claim 20 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
Claims 1 and 4-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharma (U.S. PGPub 2019/0259844) in view of Akram (U.S. PGPub 2005/0181595).
Regarding claim 1, Sharma teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising:
forming source/drain contacts (Fig. 1D, [0036], 104), forming barrier regions, the barrier regions including a material that absorbs hydrogen (108, [0028]), and forming a channel layer on the barrier regions (Fig. 2A, [0048], 102),
such that the barrier regions separate the source/drain contacts from the channel layer ([0041], embodiments of Fig. 2 may comprise any source/drain contact embodiment of Fig. 1; the embodiment of Fig. 1D has the barrier region separating the source/drain contacts from the channel layer, see annotated figures below);
the channel material including an oxide semiconductor material ([0025]);
wherein formation of the barrier regions includes forming barrier sections respectively on upper surfaces of the source/drain contacts, forming pairs of barrier sidewalls, such that after forming the source/drain contacts the pairs of barrier sidewalls are formed to surround the source/drain contacts, respectively (see annotated figures below).
PNG
media_image1.png
912
1896
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Sharma does not explicitly teach wherein forming the barrier sections and forming the pairs of the barrier sidewalls are performed in two different steps.
Sharma is silent on the specific method of forming the barrier but teaches wherein the barrier is formed using any known suitable techniques ([0059]).
Akram teaches forming a contact comprising barrier regions, wherein formation of the barrier regions includes forming a barrier section respectively on upper surfaces of the contact, forming pairs of barrier sidewalls, such that after forming the contacts the pairs of barrier sidewalls are formed to surround the contact, wherein forming the barrier section and forming the pairs of the barrier sidewalls are performed in two different steps (Fig. 8, reproduced below; barrier sidewalls 60, barrier section 66, [0053]; different steps [0054]).
PNG
media_image2.png
807
1445
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Therefore it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date to combine the teachings of Akram with Sharma such that forming the barrier sections and forming the pairs of the barrier sidewalls are performed in two different steps for the purpose of forming the structure of Sharma according to a known suitable method (Akram, [0054]).
Regarding claim 4, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches forming a gate dielectric on the channel layer and forming a gate electrode on the gate dielectric layer (Sharma, Fig. 2A, gate dielectric 116, gate electrode 118, [0041]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 1.
Regarding claim 5, the combination of Sharma and Akram does not explicitly teach wherein a minimum distance between two adjacent ones of the barrier regions is larger than 15 nanometers. Examiner takes official notice that channel length for TFTs is commonly greater than 50 or 100 nanometers. Therefore it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Sharma and Akram such that a minimum distance between two adjacent ones of the barrier regions is larger than 15 nanometers for the purpose of choosing an appropriate channel length for the transistor.
Regarding claim 6, Sharma teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising:
forming source/drain contacts, each surrounded by a pair of barrier sidewalls and covered by a barrier section which make up respective barrier regions (Fig. 1D, [0036], contacts 104, barrier 108), the barrier regions including a material that receives hydrogen ([0028]), and
forming a channel layer on the barrier section, ([0041], Fig. 2A, embodiments of Fig. 2 may comprise any source/drain contact embodiment of Fig. 1; see annotated figure below); the channel layer including an oxide semiconductor material ([0025]).
PNG
media_image1.png
912
1896
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Sharma does not explicitly teach wherein the method comprises forming trenches in a dielectric layer, forming the pair of barrier sidewalls in at least one of the trenches such that the dielectric layer is exposed from bottom surfaces of the trenches; forming the source/drain contacts respectively in the trenches so as to permit at least one of the source/drain contacts to be surrounded by the pair of barrier sidewalls; after forming the source/drain contacts, forming the barrier section which covers the source/drain contacts; wherein the barrier section has an upper surface that is flush with an upper surface of the dielectric layer.
Sharma is silent on the specific method of forming the barrier but teaches wherein the barrier is formed using any known suitable techniques ([0059]).
Akram teaches a method of forming a contact, comprising forming a trench in a dielectric layer, forming a pair of barrier sidewalls in the trench such that the dielectric layer is exposed from bottom surfaces of the trench (Figs. 4-5, dielectric 54, trench 56, barrier sidewalls 60, [0046]-[0048]);
forming the contact in the trench so as to permit the contact to be surrounded by the pair of barrier sidewalls (Fig. 5, 62, [0050]);
after forming the source/drain contacts, forming the barrier section which covers the source/drain contacts, wherein the barrier section has an upper surface that is flush with an upper surface of the dielectric layer (Fig. 8, reproduced below, 66, [0053]-[0054]).
PNG
media_image2.png
807
1445
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Therefore it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date to combine the teachings of Akram with Sharma such that the method comprises forming trenches in a dielectric layer, forming the pair of barrier sidewalls in at least one of the trenches such that the dielectric layer is exposed from bottom surfaces of the trenches; forming the source/drain contacts respectively in the trenches so as to permit at least one of the source/drain contacts to be surrounded by the pair of barrier sidewalls; after forming the source/drain contacts, forming the barrier section which covers the source/drain contacts; wherein the barrier section has an upper surface that is flush with an upper surface of the dielectric layer for the purpose of forming the structure of Sharma according to a known suitable method (Akram, [0054]).
Regarding claim 7, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the oxide semiconductor material includes indium gallium zinc oxide, indium zinc oxide, indium tin oxide, gallium oxide, or indium oxide (Sharma, [0025]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 8, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches forming a gate dielectric on the channel layer and forming a gate electrode on the gate dielectric layer (Sharma, Fig. 2A, gate dielectric 116, gate electrode 118, [0041]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 9, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the gate dielectric layer is formed after forming the channel layer (Sharma, Fig. 2A, [0048]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 10, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the gate electrode layer is formed after forming the channel layer (Sharma, Fig. 2A, [0048]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 11, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the source/drain contacts are formed in the dielectric layer using a Damascene process (Akram, [0050]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 12, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the source/drain contacts are formed after forming the pair of barrier sidewalls (Akram, Figs. 5-6). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 13, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the at least one of the source/drain contacts has a lower surface which is opposite to the barrier section (see annotated figures in rejection of claim 6), wherein the source/drain contact is in direct contact with a dielectric layer (Sharma, [0044], substrate 114 may be ILD; see Spec at [0035], ILD layer 400 may comprise multiple films), wherein the source/drain contacts are formed after forming the pair of barrier sidewalls (Akram, Figs. 5-6). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 14, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein each of the source/drain contacts includes tungsten, ruthenium, copper, tantalum nitride, titanium nitride, or combinations thereof (Sharma, [0026]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 6.
Regarding claim 15, Sharma teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising: forming source/drain contacts, each surrounded by a pair of barrier sidewalls made of a first material that receives hydrogen and covered by a barrier section made of a second material that receives hydrogen (Fig. 1D, [0036], contacts 104, barrier 108, [0028]), and after forming barrier sections, forming a channel layer on the barrier sections ([0041], Fig. 2A, embodiments of Fig. 2 may comprise any source/drain contact embodiment of Fig. 1; see annotated figure below); the channel layer including an oxide semiconductor material ([0025]).
Sharma does not explicitly teach wherein the method comprises forming trenches in a dielectric layer, forming a barrier layer over the dielectric layer, and having an upper barrier portion formed on an upper surface of the dielectric layer, bottom barrier portions which are respectively formed on bottom surfaces of the trenches, and pairs of sidewall barrier portions, which are respectively formed on lateral surfaces of the trenches; removing the upper barrier portion and the bottom barrier portions; and after removing the upper barrier portion and the bottom barrier portions, forming source/drain contacts respectively in the trenches so that the source/drain contacts are respectively surrounded by the pairs of sidewall barrier portions.
Sharma is silent on the specific method of forming the barrier but teaches wherein the barrier is formed using any known suitable techniques ([0059]).
Akram teaches a method of forming a contact, comprising:
forming trenches in a dielectric layer, forming a barrier layer over the dielectric layer, and having an upper barrier portion formed on an upper surface of the dielectric layer, bottom barrier portions which are respectively formed on bottom surfaces of the trenches, and pairs of sidewall barrier portions, which are respectively formed on lateral surfaces of the trenches (Fig. 4, dielectric 54, trench 56, barrier layer 61, [0046]-[0049]),
removing the upper barrier portion and the bottom barrier portions (Fig. 5, barrier sidewalls 60, [0046]-[0049]), and
after removing the upper barrier portion and the bottom barrier portions, forming a contact respectively in the trenches so that contact is respectively surrounded by the pairs of sidewall barrier portions (Fig. 8, reproduced below, 64, [0053]-[0054]).
PNG
media_image2.png
807
1445
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Therefore it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filing date to combine the teachings of Akram with Sharma such that the method comprises forming trenches in a dielectric layer, forming a barrier layer over the dielectric layer, and having an upper barrier portion formed on an upper surface of the dielectric layer, bottom barrier portions which are respectively formed on bottom surfaces of the trenches, and pairs of sidewall barrier portions, which are respectively formed on lateral surfaces of the trenches; removing the upper barrier portion and the bottom barrier portions; and after removing the upper barrier portion and the bottom barrier portions, forming source/drain contacts respectively in the trenches so that the source/drain contacts are respectively surrounded by the pairs of sidewall barrier portions for the purpose of forming the structure of Sharma according to a known suitable method (Akram, [0054]).
Regarding claim 16, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein each of the first material and the second material includes indium gallium zinc oxide, indium zinc oxide, zinc oxide, indium tin oxide, indium oxide, gallium oxide, indium gallium silicon zinc oxide, or combinations thereof (Sharma, [0027]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 15.
Regarding claim 17, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein the oxide semiconductor material includes indium gallium zinc oxide, indium zinc oxide, indium tin oxide, gallium oxide, or indium oxide (Sharma, [0025]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 15.
Regarding claims 18 and 20, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein each of the source/drain contacts includes tungsten, ruthenium, copper, tantalum nitride, titanium nitride, or combinations thereof (Sharma, [0026]). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 15.
Regarding claim 19, the combination of Sharma and Akram teaches wherein after forming barrier sections, barrier regions are formed, each of the barrier regions being dimensioned to be Π-shaped, and including one of the barrier sections and a respective one of the pairs of the sidewall barrier portions (Sharma, Fig. 1D, Fig. 2A, see previous annotated figure). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further combine the teachings of Sharma and Akram for the reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 15.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALIA SABUR whose telephone number is (571)270-7219. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-5:30.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S. Kim can be reached at 571-272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ALIA SABUR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812