Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/682,767

ETCHING METHOD AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Examiner
DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P.
Art Unit
1713
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Resonac Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
567 granted / 795 resolved
+6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
825
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
75.4%
+35.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 795 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending before the Office for review. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over NISHIYAMA et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2020/0203127) in view of DEGAI et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2021/0159088). With regards to claim 1, Nishiyama discloses an etching method comprising: an etching step of bringing an etching gas containing nitrosyl fluoride into contact with a member to be etched having an etching object subject to etching by the etching gas and a non- etching object not subject to etching by the etching gas, and selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma, wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon (Paragraphs [0195]-[0199], [0205], [0253]-[0260], [0262] discloses an method of etching a substrate comprising a silicon layer and other semiconductor material; wherein the etch rate of one material may be selected to selectively etch another material; wherein the method includes a thermal etching process rather than a plasma etching process; wherein the processing gas includes a FNO gas mixture). Nishiyama does not explicitly the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey, and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y. Degai discloses wherein a semiconductor device can be etch using a fluorine containing precursor including nitrosyl fluoride wherein the substrate comprises semiconductor materials including a germanium film or silicon germanium film (Paragraphs [0077]-[0088], [0090] and [0108]). Nishiyama discloses wherein the etching object includes pure silicon layers (Paragraph [025]) which discloses wherein x is 0. As such Nishiyama as modified by Degai renders obvious selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253]-[0260] discloses thermal dry etching process), wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0205] discloses pure silicon) and the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey (Nishiyama Paragraph [2005] discloses silicon containing films may include dopants such as Ge Degai Paragraphs [0108] discloses germanium film or silicon germanium film), and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y (Nishiyama Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy germanium or silicon germanium). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify the method of Nishiyama to include the germanium containing layers as rendered obvious by Degai because one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention would have had a reasonable expectation of predictably achieving the desired etching using the germanium containing layer as rendered obvious by Degai. MPEP 2143D With regards to claim 8, Nishiyama discloses A method for producing a semiconductor element, the method producing a semiconductor element using an etching method comprising: an etching step of bringing an etching gas containing nitrosyl fluoride into contact with a member to be etched having an etching object subject to etching by the etching gas and a non- etching object not subject to etching by the etching gas, and selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma, wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon and the member to be etched being a semiconductor substrate having the etching object and the non-etching object, the method comprising: a treatment step of removing at least a part of the etching object from the semiconductor substrate by the etching (Paragraphs [0195]-[0199], [0205], [0253]-[0260], [0262] discloses an method of etching a substrate comprising a silicon layer and other semiconductor material; wherein the etch rate of one material may be selected to selectively etch another material; wherein the method includes a thermal etching process rather than a plasma etching process; wherein the processing gas includes a FNO gas mixture) Nishiyama does not explicitly the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey, and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y. Degai discloses wherein a semiconductor device can be etch using a fluorine containing precursor including nitrosyl fluoride wherein the substrate comprises semiconductor materials including a germanium film or silicon germanium film (Paragraphs [0077]-[0088], [0090] and [0108]). Nishiyama discloses wherein the etching object includes pure silicon layers (Paragraph [025]) which discloses wherein x is 0. As such Nishiyama as modified by Degai renders obvious selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253]-[0260] discloses thermal dry etching process), wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0205] discloses pure silicon) and the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey (Nishiyama Paragraph [2005] discloses silicon containing films may include dopants such as Ge Degai Paragraphs [0108] discloses germanium film or silicon germanium film), and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y (Nishiyama Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy germanium or silicon germanium). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify the method of Nishiyama to include the germanium containing layers as rendered obvious by Degai because one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention would have had a reasonable expectation of predictably achieving the desired etching using the germanium containing layer as rendered obvious by Degai. MPEP 2143D With regards to claim 2, the modified teachings of Nishiyama renders obvious wherein x in the chemical formula is 0 or more and 0.1 or less. (Nishiyama Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon). With regards to claims 3-4 and 9, the modified teachings of Nishiyama renders obvious wherein y in the chemical formula is more than 0.1 and 1 or less and wherein y in the chemical formula is 0.2 or more and 1 or less. (Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy silicon germanium and y is 1 to satisfy germanium). With regards to claims 5 and 10-12, the modified teachings of Nishiyama renders obvious wherein a temperature condition of the etching step is from room temperature to 600°C (Nishiyama Paragraph [0270]) which overlaps Applicant’s claimed range of -50°C or more and 40°C or less. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976). MPEP 2144.05(I) With regards to claims 6 and 13-16, the modified teachings of Nishiyama renders obvious wherein the etching gas is a gas containing only nitrosyl fluoride or a mixed gas containing nitrosyl fluoride and a diluent gas (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253]-[0259] discloses a mixed gas of nitrosyl fluoride and a dilutant gas including nitrogen). With regards to claim 7, the modified teachings of Nishiyama renders obvious wherein the diluent gas is at least one selected from a nitrogen gas. (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253], [0256]). With regards to claim 17, Nishiyama discloses A method for producing a semiconductor element, the method producing a semiconductor element using an etching method comprising: an etching step of bringing an etching gas containing nitrosyl fluoride into contact with a member to be etched having an etching object subject to etching by the etching gas and a non- etching object not subject to etching by the etching gas, and selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma, wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon wherein x in the chemical formula is 0 or more and 0.1 or less (Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon) and the member to be etched being a semiconductor substrate having the etching object and the non-etching object, the method comprising: a treatment step of removing at least a part of the etching object from the semiconductor substrate by the etching (Paragraphs [0195]-[0199], [0205], [0253]-[0260], [0262] discloses an method of etching a substrate comprising a silicon layer and other semiconductor material; wherein the etch rate of one material may be selected to selectively etch another material; wherein the method includes a thermal etching process rather than a plasma etching process; wherein the processing gas includes a FNO gas mixture) Nishiyama does not explicitly the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey, and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y. Nishiyama discloses wherein the etching object includes pure silicon layers (Paragraph [025]) which discloses wherein x is 0. Degai discloses wherein a semiconductor device can be etch using a fluorine containing precursor including nitrosyl fluoride wherein the substrate comprises semiconductor materials including a germanium film or silicon germanium film (Paragraphs [0077]-[0088], [0090] and [0108]). As such Nishiyama as modified by Degai renders obvious selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253]-[0260] discloses thermal dry etching process), wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0205] discloses pure silicon) and the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey (Nishiyama Paragraph [2005] discloses silicon containing films may include dopants such as Ge Degai Paragraphs [0108] discloses germanium film or silicon germanium film), and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y (Nishiyama Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy germanium or silicon germanium). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify the method of Nishiyama to include the germanium containing layers as rendered obvious by Degai because one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention would have had a reasonable expectation of predictably achieving the desired etching using the germanium containing layer as rendered obvious by Degai. MPEP 2143D With regards to claims 18-19, Nishiyama discloses A method for producing a semiconductor element, the method producing a semiconductor element using an etching method comprising: an etching step of bringing an etching gas containing nitrosyl fluoride into contact with a member to be etched having an etching object subject to etching by the etching gas and a non- etching object not subject to etching by the etching gas, and selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma, wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon and the member to be etched being a semiconductor substrate having the etching object and the non-etching object, the method comprising: a treatment step of removing at least a part of the etching object from the semiconductor substrate by the etching (Paragraphs [0195]-[0199], [0205], [0253]-[0260], [0262] discloses an method of etching a substrate comprising a silicon layer and other semiconductor material; wherein the etch rate of one material may be selected to selectively etch another material; wherein the method includes a thermal etching process rather than a plasma etching process; wherein the processing gas includes a FNO gas mixture) Nishiyama does not explicitly the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey, and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y and wherein y in the chemical formula is more than 0.1 and 1 or less and wherein y in the chemical formula is 0.2 or more and 1 or less. Degai discloses wherein a semiconductor device can be etch using a fluorine containing precursor including nitrosyl fluoride wherein the substrate comprises semiconductor materials including a germanium film or silicon germanium film (Paragraphs [0077]-[0088], [0090] and [0108]) which renders obvious wherein y is greater than 0 or 1 or less. Nishiyama discloses wherein the etching object includes pure silicon layers (Paragraph [025]) which discloses wherein x is 0. As such Nishiyama as modified by Degai renders obvious selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253]-[0260] discloses thermal dry etching process), wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0205] discloses pure silicon) and the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey (Nishiyama Paragraph [2005] discloses silicon containing films may include dopants such as Ge Degai Paragraphs [0108] discloses germanium film or silicon germanium film), and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y (Nishiyama Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy germanium or silicon germanium) wherein y in the chemical formula is more than 0.1 and 1 or less and wherein y in the chemical formula is 0.2 or more and 1 or less. (Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy silicon germanium and y is 1 to satisfy germanium). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify the method of Nishiyama to include the germanium containing layers as rendered obvious by Degai because one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention would have had a reasonable expectation of predictably achieving the desired etching using the germanium containing layer as rendered obvious by Degai. MPEP 2143D With regards to claim 20, Nishiyama discloses A method for producing a semiconductor element, the method producing a semiconductor element using an etching method comprising: an etching step of bringing an etching gas containing nitrosyl fluoride into contact with a member to be etched having an etching object subject to etching by the etching gas and a non- etching object not subject to etching by the etching gas, and selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma, wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon wherein x in the chemical formula is 0 or more and 0.1 or less (Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon) wherein a temperature condition of the etching step is from room temperature to 600°C (Nishiyama Paragraph [0270]) which overlaps Applicant’s claimed range of -50°C or more and 40°C or less; and the member to be etched being a semiconductor substrate having the etching object and the non-etching object, the method comprising: a treatment step of removing at least a part of the etching object from the semiconductor substrate by the etching (Paragraphs [0195]-[0199], [0205], [0253]-[0260], [0262] discloses an method of etching a substrate comprising a silicon layer and other semiconductor material; wherein the etch rate of one material may be selected to selectively etch another material; wherein the method includes a thermal etching process rather than a plasma etching process; wherein the processing gas includes a FNO gas mixture). In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976). MPEP 2144.05(I) Nishiyama does not explicitly the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey, and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y. Degai discloses wherein a semiconductor device can be etch using a fluorine containing precursor including nitrosyl fluoride wherein the substrate comprises semiconductor materials including a germanium film or silicon germanium film (Paragraphs [0077]-[0088], [0090] and [0108]). Nishiyama discloses wherein the etching object includes pure silicon layers (Paragraph [025]) which discloses wherein x is 0. As such Nishiyama as modified by Degai renders obvious selectively etching the etching object as compared with the non-etching object without using plasma (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0253]-[0260] discloses thermal dry etching process), wherein the etching object contains at least one of silicon (Nishiyama Paragraphs [0205] discloses pure silicon) and the non-etching object contains at least one of germanium and silicon germanium represented by a chemical formula Si1-yGey (Nishiyama Paragraph [2005] discloses silicon containing films may include dopants such as Ge Degai Paragraphs [0108] discloses germanium film or silicon germanium film), and in both the chemical formulae, x is 0 or more and less than 1, y is more than 0 and 1 or less, and x is smaller than y (Nishiyama Paragraph [0205] x would equal 0 for pure silicon Degai Paragraphs [0108] y is more than 0 in order to satisfy germanium or silicon germanium). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify the method of Nishiyama to include the germanium containing layers as rendered obvious by Degai because one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention would have had a reasonable expectation of predictably achieving the desired etching using the germanium containing layer as rendered obvious by Degai. MPEP 2143D Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHANIE P. DUCLAIR whose telephone number is (571)270-5502. The examiner can normally be reached 9-6:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Allen can be reached at 571-270-3176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHANIE P DUCLAIR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1713
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604742
Layout Design Method and Structure with Enhanced Process Window
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604690
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTIVE METAL-CONTAINING HARDMASK REMOVAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598935
COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING A MATERIAL REMOVING OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598964
HARDMASK INTEGRATION FOR HIGH ASPECT RATIO APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581881
PLASMA PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+19.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 795 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month