Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/684,046

RESIST COMPOSITION, RESIST PATTERN FORMATION METHOD, COMPOUND, ACID-GENERATING AGENT, ACID DIFFUSION CONTROL AGENT, AND HIGH-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT COMPOUND

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Priority
Aug 26, 2021 — JP 2021-138091 +1 more
Examiner
EOFF, ANCA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1003 granted / 1253 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1292
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1253 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 are pending. The foreign priority application No.2021-138091 filed on August 26, 2021 in Japan has been received and it is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Anryu et al. (US 2019/0137873), as evidenced by Abdourazak et al. (US 2004/0175644). With regard to claim 1, Anryu et al. teach a salt of formula (I): PNG media_image1.png 140 222 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein A- represents a counter anion, and a resist composition including the salt of formula (I)(abstract). The cation of the salt of formula (I) may be represented by the formula: PNG media_image2.png 236 426 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0056). A salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is a compound comprising a cation (C0) of formula (c0) in claim 1, wherein nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, and n3=0. A hydroxyl group (-OH) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0005 of Abdourazak et al.), and a fluorine atom (F) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0034 of the specification of the instant application). Anryu et al. further teach that the salt of formula (I) is used as acid generator (par.0210). Therefore, the resist composition meets the limitation of claim 1 for “a resist composition which generates an acid upon light exposure” in claim 1. The resist composition comprises a resin with an acid-labile group, wherein an acid-labile group is a group which is eliminated by contact with an acid to convert the unit into a unit having a hydroxylic group (par.0262). This means that the solubility of the resist composition in an alkali developing solution is changed due to an action of the acid in claim 1. Therefore, the resist composition of Anryu et al. anticipates the resist composition in claim 1 of the instant application. With regard to claim 2, the resin having an acid-labile group, wherein an acid-labile group is a group which is eliminated by contact with an acid to convert the unit into a unit having a hydroxylic group (par.0262 of Anryu et al.) is the claimed “resin component (A1) whose solubility in a developing solution is changed due to the action of an acid”. Anryu et al. further teach that the salt of formula (I) is used as acid generator (par.0210). This is equivalent to “an acid-generating agent component (B) which generates an acid upon light exposure, wherein the acid-generating agent component (B) contains a compound of General Formula (b0), wherein Mb+ is a cation (C0) and Xb- is a counter anion” in claim 2. With regard to claim 3, the resin having an acid-labile group, wherein an acid-labile group is a group which is eliminated by contact with an acid to convert the unit into a unit having a hydroxylic group (par.0262 of Anryu et al.) is the claimed “resin component (A1) whose solubility in a developing solution is changed due to the action of an acid”. A salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is a compound of General Formula (d0), wherein nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, n3=0, and Xd- is a counter anion. A hydroxyl group (-OH) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0005 of Abdourazak et al.), and a fluorine atom (F) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0034 of the specification of the instant application). The salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is a compound of General Formula (d0), so it may function as acid diffusion control agent. "[T]he discovery of a previously unappreciated property of a prior art composition, or of a scientific explanation for the prior art’s functioning, does not render the old composition patentably new to the discoverer." Atlas Powder Co. v. IRECO Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1347, 51 USPQ2d 1943, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Thus the claiming of a new use, new function or unknown property which is inherently present in the prior art does not necessarily make the claim patentable. In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1254, 195 USPQ 430, 433 (CCPA 1977).. (MPEP 2112.I. SOMETHING WHICH IS OLD DOES NOT BECOME PATENTABLE UPON THE DISCOVERY OF A NEW PROPERTY) With regard to claim 6, Anryu et al. teach a process comprising the steps of: -applying the resist composition on a substrate and drying the applied composition to form a composition layer; -exposing the composition layer to light; -heating the exposed composition layer; and -developing the heated composition layer to form a resist pattern (par.0651 and par.0654). With regard to claims 7 and 8, Anryu et al. teach a salt of formula (I): PNG media_image1.png 140 222 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein A- represents a counter anion (abstract). The cation of the salt of formula (I) may be represented by the formula: PNG media_image2.png 236 426 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0056). A salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is a compound of General Formula (M0) in claim 7, wherein nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, n3=0, and X- is a counter anion. Anryu et al. further teach that the salt of formula (I) is used as acid generator (par.0210). Therefore, a salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is an acid-generating agent comprising a compound of General Formula (B0) in claim 8, wherein nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, n3=0, and Xb- is a counter anion. A hydroxyl group (-OH) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0005 of Abdourazak et al.), and a fluorine atom (F) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0034 of the specification of the instant application). With regard to claim 9, Anryu et al. teach a salt of formula (I): PNG media_image1.png 140 222 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein A- represents a counter anion (abstract). The cation of the salt of formula (I) may be represented by the formula: PNG media_image2.png 236 426 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0056). A salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is a compound of General Formula (D0) in claim 9, wherein nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, n3=0, and Xd- is a counter anion. A hydroxyl group (-OH) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0005 of Abdourazak et al.), and a fluorine atom (F) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0034 of the specification of the instant application). The salt of formula (I) above wherein the cation is represented of the formula (I-c-18) is a compound of General Formula (D0) in claim 9, so it may function as acid diffusion control agent (MPEP 2112.I. SOMETHING WHICH IS OLD DOES NOT BECOME PATENTABLE UPON THE DISCOVERY OF A NEW PROPERTY). Claims 1, 2, and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Komuro et al. (JP 2021-151989 A, with attached machine translation). With regard to claims 1 and 2, Komuro et al. teach a resist composition comprising the resin A-2 and the compound I-734: PNG media_image3.png 106 354 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 140 240 media_image4.png Greyscale (resin A-2 in par.0233, compound I-734 in par.0229, Example 10 in Table 2, par.0236). The resin A-2 comprises acid-labile groups (par.0096), so the resist composition has the solubility in a developing solution changed due to the action of an acid, as required in claim 1. The resin A-2 is a “resin (A-1) whose solubility in a developing solution changed due to the action of an acid” in claim 2 of the instant application, The compound I-734 is an acid generator (abstract), so the resist composition generates an acid upon light exposure as required in claim 1. The compound I-734 comprises a cation (C0) of General Formula (c0) in claim 1 wherein nx1=1, nx2=2, X01 is iodine (I), X02 is fluorine (F), n1=0, n2=0, and n3=0. Fluorine (F) and iodine (I) atoms are electron-withdrawing groups, as defined in par.0034 of the specification of the instant application. The compound I-734 is an acid generating agent component (B) of Genera Formula (b0), wherein Mb+ is a cation (C0) and Xb- is a counter anion. Therefore, the resist composition in Example 10 of Komuro et al. anticipates the resist compositions in claims 1 and 2 of the instant application. With regard to claim 6, Komuro et al. teach a process comprising the steps of: -applying the resist composition on a substrate and drying the applied composition to form a composition layer; -exposing the composition layer to light; -heating the exposed composition layer; and -developing the heated composition layer to form a resist pattern (par.0216). With regard to claims 7 and 8, Komuro et al. teach the compound I-734: PNG media_image4.png 140 240 media_image4.png Greyscale (par.0229). The compound I-734 is a compound of General Formula (M0) in claim 7, wherein nx1=1, nx2=2, X01 is iodine (I), X02 is fluorine (F), n1=0, n2=0, n3=0, and X- is a counter anion. The compound I-734 is an acid-generating agent of General Formula (B0) in claim 8, wherein nx1=1, nx2=2, X01 is iodine (I), X02 is fluorine (F), n1=0, n2=0, n3=0, and Xb- is a counter anion. Fluorine (F) and iodine (I) atoms are electron-withdrawing groups, as defined in par.0034 of the specification of the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-6, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hatakeyama et al. (US 2021/0116808) in view of Anryu et al. (US 2019/0137873) and as evidenced by Abdourazak et al. (US 2004/0175644). With regard to claims 1 and 10, Hatakeyama et al. teach a positive resist composition comprising a base polymer comprising a base polymer comprising recurring units (b1) having acid labile group-substituted carboxyl group (abstract). The base polymer may further comprise recurring units of formulas (d2) or (d3): PNG media_image5.png 210 442 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 166 440 media_image6.png Greyscale , wherein RA is a hydrogen atom or methyl, R23-R28 are C1-C20 hydrocarbyl which may contain a heteroatom, R23 and R24 or R26 and R27 may bond together to form a ring with the sulfur atom to which they are attached (par.0019). The recurring units (d2) and (d3) have the function of acid generator(par.0090). Therefore, the positive resist composition of Hatakeyama et al. is a “resist composition which generates an acid upon light exposure and whose solubility in a developing solution is due to an action of an acid” in claim 1 of the instant application. Hatakeyama et al. fail to teach that the repeating units (d2) and (d3) comprise a cation (C0) of General Formula (c0) in claim 1 or a constitutional unit (a0) of General Formula (A0-1) in claim 10. Anryu et al. teach a salt of formula (I): PNG media_image1.png 140 222 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein A- represents a counter anion such as an organic sulfonic acid anion, and a resist composition including the salt of formula (I) as acid generator (abstract, par.0010, par.0210).The cation of the salt of formula (I) may be represented by the formula: PNG media_image2.png 236 426 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0056). The cation of formula (I-c-18) of Anryu et al. is a cation of formula: PNG media_image7.png 106 80 media_image7.png Greyscale in the repeating unit (d2) of Hatakeyama et al. wherein R23 and R24 are bonded to form a ring, and R25 is a C6 hydrocarbon group substituted with a fluorine atom (F) and a hydroxyl group (-OH), and a cation of formula: PNG media_image8.png 104 84 media_image8.png Greyscale in the repeating unit (d3) of Hatakeyama et al. wherein R26 and R27 are bonded to form a ring, and R28 is a C6 hydrocarbon group substituted with a fluorine atom (F) and a hydroxyl group (-OH). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to use a cation of formula (I-c-18) of Anryu et al. as the cation in the repeating units (d2) and (d3) of Hatakeyama et al. Therefore, the repeating units (d2) and (d3) of Hatakeyama modified by Anryu comprise a cation (C0) of formula (c0) in claim 1, wherein nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, and n3=0. The repeating units (d2) and (d3) of Hatakeyama modified by Anryu are constitutional units (a0) of General Formula (A0-1) in claim 10, wherein R is hydrogen or methyl (alkyl group with 1 carbon atom), Rx0 is a group having an anion, nx1=1, nx2=1, X01 is a fluorine atom, X02 is a hydroxyl group, n1=0, n2=0, and n3=0. A hydroxyl group (-OH) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0005 of Abdourazak et al.), and a fluorine atom (F) is an electron withdrawing group (see par.0034 of the specification of the instant application). With regard to claim 4, the repeating units (d2) and (d3) of Hatakeyama modified by Anryu are constitutional units (a0) of General formula (a0-1) wherein R is hydrogen or methyl (alkyl group with 1 carbon atom), Rx0 is a group having an anion, Ma+ is a cation of formula (C0). With regard to claim 5, Hatakeyama et al. teach that the base polymer comprises recurring units (b1) having acid labile group-substituted carboxyl group (abstract). With regard to claim 6, Hatakeyama et al. teach a process comprising the steps of: -applying the resist composition on a substrate and drying the applied composition to form a composition layer; -exposing the composition layer to light; -heating the exposed composition layer; and -developing the heated composition layer to form a resist pattern (par.0161-0164). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANCA EOFF whose telephone number is (571)272-9810. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at (571)272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANCA EOFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704782
ACTINIC RAY-SENSITIVE OR RADIATION-SENSITIVE RESIN COMPOSITION, ACTINIC RAY-SENSITIVE OR RADIATION-SENSITIVE FILM, PATTERN FORMING METHOD, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPOUND
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686670
Compound, Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution Including the Same, and Lithium Secondary Battery
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683144
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658462
Hydrogen fuel cell power source with metal bipolar plates
8y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655111
Novel Phenazine-Based Compounds
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1253 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month