Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/687,298

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, TEMPORARY-FIXING MATERIAL, AND APPLICATION FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF TEMPORARY-FIXING MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Priority
Sep 03, 2021 — JP PCT/JP2021/032475 +1 more
Examiner
ERDEM, FAZLI
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
RESONAC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
918 granted / 1075 resolved
+17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1099
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1075 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Akutsu et al. (WO2018181767) (Prior Art Submitted by the applicant on 4/24/2024) Regarding Claim 1, in Figs. 1-4, Akutsu et al. discloses a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising: preparing a carrier substrate 11/12 comprising a support 11 and a temporary fixing material layer 12 provided on the support; arranging a semiconductor chip comprising a chip main body portion CP and an electrode pad W3 provided on an outer surface of the chip main body portion on the temporary fixing material layer; forming a sealing layer 40/41 (40 is the uncured phase, 41 is the cured phase) sealing the semiconductor chip, thereby forming a sealing structure comprising the semiconductor chip and the sealing layer on the carrier substrate, the sealing structure comprising a connection (bottom)m surface in contact with the temporary fixing material layer (Figs 2C and 2D), the semiconductor chip CP being exposed to the connection (bottom) surface, and a step formed by the semiconductor chip and the sealing layer on the connection surface being 5.0 pm or less; separating the carrier substrate from the sealing structure (see Fig. 2F); and providing a redistribution layer 70 comprising multilayer wirings connected to the electrode pad and an insulating layer filling 61/62 (see Fig 3B) a space between the wirings 70 on the connection surface of the sealing structure 41. Regarding Claim 2, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al. a thickness of the temporary fixing material layer is 50 pm or less. Regarding Claim 3, in Figs.1-4 of Akutsu et al. a thickness of the temporary fixing material layer is more than 10 pm and 50 pm or less. Regarding Claim 4, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutus et al. a tensile elastic modulus of the support at 23 0C is 100 GPa or more. Regarding Claim 5, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al. the support 11 is a glass plate, a metal plate, a silicon wafer, or a ceramic plate. Regarding Claim 6, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al, a thickness of the temporary fixing material layer and a tensile elastic modulus of the support at 23 C are selected in a range such that the step is 5.0 or less (since no more than 2 micrometer language) Regarding Claim 7, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al, a thickness of the temporary fixing material layer is selected in a range of 50 micrometer or less. Regarding Claim 8, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al., a thickness of the temporary fixing material layer 12 is selected in a range of more than 10 micrometer and 50 micrometer or less. Regarding Claim 9, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al, the tensile elastic modulus of the support at 23 0C is selected in the range of 100 GPa or more. Regarding Claim 10, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al, the support 11 is selected from a glass plate, a metal plate, a silicon wafer, and a ceramic plate. Regarding Claim 11, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al, the insulating layer 61/62 comprises an intermediate layer interposed between the wirings and the sealing structure, and a maximum value of a thickness of the intermediate layer is 15 m or less. Regarding Claim 12, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al, the sealing layer 40 is formed by compression molding comprising heating and pressurizing a granular sealing material comprising a curable resin and an inorganic filler in a mold. Regarding Claim 13, in Figs. 1-4 of Akutsu et al. the sealing layer 40 is formed by a method comprising laminating a film-shaped sealing material comprising a curable resin and an inorganic filler on the carrier substrate. Pertinent art, that is NOT relied upon on this rejection, Jang 20230223309 discloses step/level difference between top surface of the semiconductor chip and sealant. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAZLI ERDEM whose telephone number is (571)272-1914. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at 571-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAZLI ERDEM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 6/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677476
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676188
MICROELECTRONIC DEVICES WITH MIRRORED BLOCKS OF MULTI-SET STAIRCASED STADIUMS, AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672349
DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM TO PROVIDE AN INTERCONNECT BETWEEN CHANNEL STRUCTURES
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672312
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660509
MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1075 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month