Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/692,450

FRUIT-CONTAINING CONFECTIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Priority
Sep 20, 2021 — provisional 63/245,969 +1 more
Examiner
PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI
Art Unit
1793
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
WM. WRIGLEY JR. Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
331 granted / 725 resolved
-19.3% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 725 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application Receipt is acknowledged of the request for continued examination, amendment and response filed 9/2/2026. Claims 1-22 are pending in the application. Claims 1 and 14 were amended. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/2/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments in view of the amended claims are persuasive. The previous rejection of claims under 35 USC 103 is withdrawn. However, the claims are not in condition for allowance for the reasons detailed in the current Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 and dependent claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites that the intermediate-moisture fruit is incorporated into the fruit-containing confection with “minimal destruction to the cell structure of the fruit.” The term “minimal destruction “is a relative term or term of degree. While the Specification describes intermediate-moisture fruit as being prepared with “minimal destruction to cell structure of the fruit”, the Specification does not provide an objective standard for determining what degree of destruction constitutes “minimal destruction.” In particular, the Specification does not identify a criterion or method for evaluating the degree of destruction to the cell structure or otherwise establish a boundary between destruction that is “minimal” and destruction that falls outside the scope of this limitation. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the metes and bounds of the claimed limitation. It is therefore unclear what degree of destruction to the structure of the fruit satisfies the limitation and what degree does not (See MPEP 2173.05(b)) Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Subbalakshmi Prakash whose telephone number is (571)270-3685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Le can be reached at (571) 272-0903. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUBBALAKSHMI PRAKASH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1793
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 05, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696908
REACTIVE GAS, REACTIVE GAS GENERATION SYSTEM AND PRODUCT TREATMENT USING REACTIVE GAS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12677859
POWDERED SOY SAUCE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672665
FOOD MANUFACTURING SUPPORT APPARATUS, FOOD MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667108
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR THE FINAL PROOFING OF DOUGH
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660834
METHOD FOR SMEAR-RIPENING OF CHEESE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+36.1%)
3y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 725 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month