Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

WM. WRIGLEY JR. Company

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

WM. WRIGLEY JR. Company has 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company is managing multiple reviews within its primary technical field. For the applicant, the use of 2 distinct art units means that their innovations are being evaluated against different sets of prior art and examination standards, requiring a more varied prosecution strategy within the Chemistry & Materials sector.

The busiest examiner, PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI, is responsible for 2 pending office actions. This accounts for 2 of the 3 total pending office actions. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the company must balance the requirements of a primary examiner while also managing a single action with another reviewer. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI, as this examiner has a significant influence over the majority of the portfolio's current status. The presence of 3 pending office actions indicates an active phase of prosecution for the company's current filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI 2 45.7% +36.1%
KERSHAW, KELLY P 1 17.7% +16.0%
MERRIAM, ANDREW E 1 26.8% +32.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18443775 CHEWING GUMS AND CONFECTIONS HAVING INCLUSIONS OF STABILIZED PLANT PIECES KERSHAW, KELLY P 36d
16973258 EDIBLE CONFECTIONERY COATINGS INCLUDING CALCIUM CARBONATE MERRIAM, ANDREW E —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18443775 CHEWING GUMS AND CONFECTIONS HAVING INCLUSIONS OF STABILIZED PLANT PIECES KERSHAW, KELLY P 36d
18843027 DEEP CLEANING CHEWING GUM PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI —
18692450 FRUIT-CONTAINING CONFECTIONS PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI —
16973258 EDIBLE CONFECTIONERY COATINGS INCLUDING CALCIUM CARBONATE MERRIAM, ANDREW E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 2
1793 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18843027 DEEP CLEANING CHEWING GUM PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18692450 FRUIT-CONTAINING CONFECTIONS PRAKASH, SUBBALAKSHMI 1793 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2024
18443775 CHEWING GUMS AND CONFECTIONS HAVING INCLUSIONS OF STABILIZED PLANT PIECES KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §103§112 Non-Final OA 36d Pending Feb 16, 2024
16973258 EDIBLE CONFECTIONERY COATINGS INCLUDING CALCIUM CARBONATE MERRIAM, ANDREW E 1791 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 08, 2020

Managing WM. WRIGLEY JR. Company's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month