Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/711,842

APPARATUS FOR SUPPLYING LIQUID TARGET MATERIAL TO A RADIATION SOURCE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 20, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2021 — EU 21209681.2 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, HUNG
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
ASML Netherlands B.V.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1323 granted / 1459 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1459 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claim 28, the limitation of “the second reservoir is increased” is ambiguous since it is unclear what the second reservoir the Applicant refers to? “The second reservoir lacks proper antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 18-20 and 28-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hergenhan et al (U.S. 2010/0282987 A1) With respect to claim 18 and, 28, 32, Hergenhan discloses an apparatus and a corresponding method for supplying a liquid target material to an EUV radiation source and comprising substantially all features of the instant claims such as: a first reservoir (44) containing the liquid target (2); a pressurizing system (see figures 10-11) configured to pressurize a fluid (74) and a separating device (463; 464) configured to separate the fluid from the liquid target material (2) in the first reservoir (44) and to transfer a pressure from the fluid to the liquid target material (2). As to claim 20, wherein the separating device (463; 464) has a deformable member/bellow (see figures 10, 11) having corrugated or concertinaed sidewall and wherein the pressurizing system is configured to pressurize the fluid inside the bellows or around an exterior of the bellows within the reservoir to transfer the pressure from the fluid to the liquid target material (2). As to claim 29, Hergenhan discloses a first apparatus (44); a second apparatus (44’) and wherein the first apparatus and the second apparatus are coupled in fluid communication to an ejection system by a transport system (see figure 2). As to claims 30-31, a radiation source for a lithographic tool having a fuel emitter (see paragraph [0046]) and wherein the radiation source is configured to output EUV radiation (15). Hergenhan does not expressly disclose the pressure system configured to pressure a hydraulic fluid. It would have been obvious to a skilled artisan before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to replace the fluid/gas (74) of Hergenhan with a hydraulic fluid to improve pressure stability and avoid gas dissolution in the target material 2 (tin), a predictable result from a known substitution. As to claim 19, Hergenhan does not expressly discloses the separating device has at least one of polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene, tungsten, tantalum, Molybdenum, as recited in the claim. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to select a proper material for the separating device such as: one of polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene, tungsten, tantalum, Molybdefnum, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-27 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 21-27 have been found allowable since the prior art of record, either alone or in combination, neither discloses nor makes obvious a combination of an apparatus comprising among other features, a first reservoir; a pressuring system; a separating device and along with at least one external heating element or at least one sensor with particular structures and functions of those elements as recited in the mentioned claims of the present application. Prior Art Made of Record The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Niimi et al (US 2022/0141945 A1); Tedrow (U.S.Pat. 11,988,967) disclose target material supply devices and have been cited for technical background. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG HENRY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2124. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Minh Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HUNG HENRY NGUYEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2882 Hvn 10/29/25 /HUNG V NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
May 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640338
SCREENING EDGE PLACEMENT UNIFORMITY WAFER STOCHASTICS
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638774
EXPOSURE APPARATUS AND WIRING PATTERN FORMING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12619159
METHOD FOR MODELING MEASUREMENT DATA OVER A SUBSTRATE AREA AND ASSOCIATED APPARATUSES
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619165
ELECTROSTATIC HOLDER, OBJECT TABLE AND LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619170
PROJECTION UNIT FOR A LEVEL SENSOR, METHOD OF MONITORING HEIGHT OF A SUBSTRATE, AND LITHOGRAPHIC SYSTEM COMPRISING THE PROJECTION UNIT
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1459 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month