Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/741,963

Contact Structures In Semiconductor Devices

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Priority
Aug 07, 2020 — provisional 63/062,821 +2 more
Examiner
BOWEN, ADAM S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allowance Rate
718 granted / 744 resolved
+36.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
748
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 744 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/13/2024 was filed before the first action on the merits. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (US Pat. 9,837,357). Re claim 1, Adusumilli teaches a method (Figs. 9-12), comprising: forming, on a substrate (902), a first doped semiconductor region (905) with a first type conductivity (N); forming, on the substrate (902), a second doped semiconductor region (911) with a second type conductivity (P); forming a first silicide layer (1002) on the first doped semiconductor region (905); forming a second silicide layer (1102) on the first silicide layer (1002); forming a doped silicide layer (1102) on the second doped semiconductor region (911); and depositing first (1202, “device 910”) and second (1202, “device 912”) conductive layers on the second silicide layer (1102, “device 910”) and the doped silicide layer (1102, “device 912”), respectively. Prior art of record Re claim 11, Adusumilli (US Pat. 9,837,357) teaches a method (Figs. 9-12), comprising: forming a source/drain region (905) on a substrate (902); and forming, on the source/drain region (905), a conductive structure (1002). Adusumilli does not explicitly teach depositing a first metal layer on the source/drain region; converting the first metal layer to a doped silicide layer on the source/drain region; and depositing a second metal layer on the doped silicide layer. Re claim 17, Adusumilli (US Pat. 9,837,357) teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate (902); a fin structure (906) disposed on the substrate (902); a source/drain region (905) disposed on the fin structure (906); and a contact structure (918), comprising: a zirconium-based layer disposed on the source/drain region (Co. 8, lines 64-67 and Col. 9, lines 1-25). Adusumilli does not explicitly teach a transition metal doped silicide layer disposed on zirconium-based layer; a dipole layer disposed at an interface between the zirconium-based layer and the source/drain region; and a metal layer disposed on the transition metal doped silicide layer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Re claim 2, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the first silicide layer comprises depositing a metal layer on the first doped semiconductor region without depositing the metal layer on the second doped semiconductor region. Re claim 3, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the second silicide layer comprises: depositing a dopant source layer on the first silicide layer; and depositing a metal layer on the dopant source layer. Re claim 4, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the second silicide layer comprises forming a transition metal doped silicide layer. Re claim 5, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the second silicide layer comprises forming an undoped silicide layer. Re claim 6, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the doped silicide layer comprises: depositing a transition metal layer on the second doped semiconductor region; and depositing a metal layer on the transition metal layer. Re claim 7, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the doped silicide layer comprises: depositing, on the second doped semiconductor region, a first metal layer with a first electronegativity value; and depositing, on the first metal layer, a second metal layer with a second electronegativity value greater than the first electronegativity value. Re claim 8, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to wherein forming the doped silicide layer comprises forming a transition metal doped silicide layer with a dopant concentration profile having a peak dopant concentration at an interface between the transition metal doped silicide layer and the second doped semiconductor region. Re claim 9, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to further comprising performing an anneal process on the doped silicide layer prior to depositing the second conductive layer. Re claim 10, Adusumilli teaches the method of claim 1, yet remains explicitly silent to further comprising forming a zirconium-based ternary compound layer between the doped silicide layer and the second doped semiconductor region. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not anticipate or make obvious the method of claim 11, including each of the limitations and specifically depositing a first metal layer on the source/drain region; converting the first metal layer to a doped silicide layer on the source/drain region; and depositing a second metal layer on the doped silicide layer, for the same reasons as mentioned for claim 11 in the prior art of record above. The prior art of record does not anticipate or make obvious the device of claim 17, including each of the limitations and specifically a transition metal doped silicide layer disposed on zirconium-based layer; a dipole layer disposed at an interface between the zirconium-based layer and the source/drain region; and a metal layer disposed on the transition metal doped silicide layer, for the same reasons as mentioned for claim 17 in the prior art of record above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM S BOWEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3984. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fernando Toledo can be reached on 571-272-1867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FERNANDO L TOLEDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897 /ADAM S BOWEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751081
TRANSISTOR ISOLATION REGIONS AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740100
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727240
STACKED COMPLEMENTARY FINFET PROCESS AND DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727144
Forming Connect Structures in Memory Systems
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727447
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+2.4%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 744 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month