Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/748,694

METHOD OF PROCESSING A SAMPLE, AND CHARGED PARTICLE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Dec 20, 2021 — EU 21216074.1 +1 more
Examiner
MCCORMACK, JASON L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ASML Holding N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
880 granted / 1040 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1074
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1040 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 (subsection (a)) specifies “scanning each sub-beam in the direction parallel to the first direction and repeatedly in the direction parallel to the second direction” and then recites processing “one of a plurality of elongate regions on the sample surface with the sub-beam”. Since “each sub-beam” is scanned, it is unclear which of the multi-beam of sub-beams is referenced as “the sub-beam”. Claim 1 (subsection (e)) recites “…respective elongate regions previously processed by the sub-beam”. However, step (a) recites a step of “scanning each sub-beam in the direction parallel to the first direction and repeatedly in the direction parallel to the second direction” and it is therefore unclear which of the multi-beam of sub-beams is “the sub-beam” recited in step (e). Claims 2-15 inherit the limitations of claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Muraki et al. U.S. PGPUB No. 2001/0004185 discloses a method of processing a sample (“a charged-particle beam exposure apparatus for drawing a pattern on a substrate with a charged particle beam” [0001]) using a multi-beam of sub-beams of charged particles using a charged particle device for projecting the multi-beam (“the aperture array AA has a plurality of apertures formed in a substrate, and divides an electron beam from the condenser lens 2 into a plurality of electron beams” [0067]) onto a sample surface (“a plurality of electron beams execute exposure of corresponding element exposure fields (EF) again to expose the second subfield (SF2)” [0088]), the method comprising in sequence: (a) move the sample in a direction parallel to a first direction (Y) while using the charged particle device to repeatedly move the multi-beam relative to the sample surface in a direction parallel to a second direction (X) (“the X-Y stage 11 is continuously driven in the Y direction, and a plurality of electron beams are deflected by the deflector 6 so as to follow movement of the X-Y stage 11” [0084]), thereby scanning each sub-beam in the direction parallel to the first direction and repeatedly in the direction parallel to the second direction to process a section EF of one of a plurality of elongate regions SF on the sample surface 5 with the sub-beam (figure 8 illustrates that each beam is rastered within an exposure field EF to scan repeatedly in the X-direction), the distance of movement of the sample in (a) being equal to or less than one half of the pitch at the sample surface of the sub-beams in the multi-beam in the first direction (since figure 8 illustrates that each row of a raster of an individual beam irradiated in an exposure field EF is advanced a distance less than the pitch, where the pitch is the distance between similar points in adjacent exposure fields EF: “each electron beam scans and exposes a corresponding element exposure field (EF) on the substrate 5” [0085]); (b) displace the sample in a direction oblique or perpendicular to the first direction (after exposing an exposure field EF by deflecting in the X-direction and scanning the stage in the Y-direction, the beams are deflected to a different subfield SF until an entire main field MF is exposed, and then the stage is advanced in the Y-direction until main field 8 is exposed, and then the stage is advanced in the X-direction (perpendicular to the Y-direction) to scan a second strip, as illustrated in figure 8: “The sub-controller 120 instructs the stage driving control circuit 118 to move the X-Y stage 11 by one step in the X direction, and executes exposure of the next stripe field (STRIPE2)” [0090]); (c) repeat (a) to process a section of a further elongate region of the plurality of elongate regions with each sub-beam (since figure 8 illustrates that the process of (a), to process a set of exposure fields EF of a sub field SF of a main field MF is repeated after the stage is advanced in the X-direction [0090] to begin exposing STRIPE 2). However, Muraki only discloses the step (b), advancing the stage in an X-direction to expose a second stripe STRIPE2 once, and does not disclose an additional advancing step (b), as required by the step (d): repeat (b) and (c) multiple times to process sections of further respective elongate regions of the plurality of elongate regions with each sub-beam. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON L MCCORMACK whose telephone number is (571)270-1489. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:00AM-5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Kim can be reached at 571-272-2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON L MCCORMACK/Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700070
Method for Beam Interference Compensation Based on Computer Vision
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699072
DYNAMIC HEATING OF A DIFFERENTIAL MOBILITY SPECTROMETER CELL
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700566
OBJECTIVE LENS ARRAY ASSEMBLY, ELECTRON-OPTICAL SYSTEM, ELECTRON-OPTICAL SYSTEM ARRAY, METHOD OF FOCUSING
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695054
PRECISION IN STEREOSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS USING A PRE-DEPOSITION LAYER
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695049
ION BEAM DEPOSITION APPARATUS AND ION BEAM DEPOSITION METHOD USING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1040 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month