Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/749,379

ROTATING NUCLEAR MEDICINE DETECTOR WITH TWO COLLIMATORS

Non-Final OA §101§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Jul 11, 2022 — continuation of 12/042,315
Examiner
KIM, KIHO
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
GE Precision Healthcare LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1429 granted / 1672 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1690
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
79.9%
+39.9% vs TC avg
§102
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1672 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,042,315 B2. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under Double Patenting, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to independent claim 1, Peretta (US 2020/0297295 A1) teaches A radiation detector head assembly, comprising: a detector column, comprising: a detector having a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface; a first collimator disposed over the first surface of the detector configured for use during imaging scans involving radiation in a first energy range; however, the prior art of record fails to teach or reasonably suggest: a second collimator disposed over the second surface of the detector configured for use during imaging scans involving radiation in a second energy range different from the first energy range; a first radiation shield disposed over the first collimator, wherein the first radiation shield comprises a first recess for receiving the first collimator and a first opening over a third surface of the first collimator, the third surface being opposite the first surface of the detector; and a second radiation shield disposed over the second collimator, wherein the second radiation shield comprises a second recess for receiving the second collimator and a second opening over a fourth surface of the second collimator, the fourth surface being opposite the second surface of the detector. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIHO KIM, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-1628. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at (571)272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KIHO KIM, Ph.D. Primary Examiner Art Unit 2884 /Kiho Kim/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §DOUBLEPATENT
May 12, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638601
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638605
PLASMA LIGHT DETECTION SYSTEM INCLUDING A SCINTILLATING WINDOW
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641703
MONITORING THE STATE OF AN X-RAY TUBE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631546
Multi-Modal Fluorescence Imaging Flow Cytometry System
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628261
OPERATING A FILAMENT OF AN X-RAY TUBE
1y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.2%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1672 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month