Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/753,608

OVERLAPPING RETICLE PLACEMENT FOR LITHOGRAPHIC FABRICATION OF A DIE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Examiner
ASFAW, MESFIN T
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Semiconductor Components Industries LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
794 granted / 961 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Burton et al. [US 20200066651 A1, hereafter Burton]. As per Claims 1 and 12, Burton teaches a die 104 (See fig. 1, Para 25, a maximum number semiconducting die that can be fit onto a surface of the substrate) comprising: a first region (a first reticle field 402) and a second region (a second reticle field 410) that overlap in an overlap region (the reticle field overlap 416) (See fig. 4B, Para 64); an array of circuit elements arranged in a grid spanning the first region and the second region (See fig. 1, Para 16, fabricating integrated circuit devices that span multiple reticle fields); and an overlap set of circuit elements including circuit elements from the array that are disposed in the overlap region (Para 15, the overlapping conductive interconnections extend into a common scribe zone between adjacent reticle fields), wherein: a first subset of the overlap set receives a lithographic deposition of a first layer as the first layer is deposited to the first region using a first reticle aligned with the first region (See fig. 4, Para 64, patterning 404 a photolithographic layer of an integrated circuit device within a first reticle field 402 using a reticle), and a second subset of the overlap set receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the second region using a second reticle aligned with the second region (patterned 412 in a second reticle field 410 adjacent to and overlapping with the first reticle field 402). As per Claims 2 and 13, Burton teaches the die of claim 1, wherein the array of circuit elements includes an array of pixels and the die is implemented as an image sensor die configured to produce a photographic image based on light detected by the array of pixels (Para 32, wherein field effect transistors (FETs), finFETs, planar FETs, MOSFETs, as well as many other types of semiconductor devices). As per Claim 3, Burton teaches the die of claim 2, wherein the array of circuit elements further includes a plurality of access circuits corresponding to the array of pixels and configured to facilitate operation of the array of pixels during production of the photographic image (Para 32, wherein field effect transistors (FETs), finFETs, planar FETs, MOSFETs, as well as many other types of semiconductor devices). As per Claims 4 and 14, Burton teaches the die of claim 1, wherein: a third subset of the overlap set receives a lithographic deposition of a second layer as the second layer is deposited to the first region using a third reticle aligned with the first region; and a fourth subset of the overlap set within the overlap set receives the lithographic deposition of the second layer as the second layer is deposited to the second region using a fourth reticle aligned to the second region (See fig. 2A). As per Claim 5, Burton teaches the die of claim 4, wherein: the third subset is different from the first subset and the second subset; the first layer is of a first layer type selected from a group consisting of a metal layer type, a doping layer type, and a dielectric layer type; and the second layer is of a second layer type selected from the group and different from the first layer type (Para 26-30, each of the individual reticle fields 108A-108D is separated from adjacent reticle fields by a scribe zone). As per Claim 6, Burton teaches the die of claim 1, wherein the die further comprises: a third region that overlaps the second region in an additional overlap region and that is also spanned by the grid; and an additional overlap set of circuit elements including circuit elements from the array that are disposed in the additional overlap region, wherein: a third subset of the additional overlap set receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the second region using the second reticle aligned with the second region, and a fourth subset of the additional overlap set receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the third region using a third reticle aligned with the third region (See fig. 2A, Para 26-30). As per Claim 7, Burton teaches the die of claim 6, wherein the first region, the second region, and the third region are arranged collinearly such that the second region is disposed between the first region and the third region (See fig. 3C). As per Claim 8, Burton teaches the die of claim 6, wherein: the third region is arranged non-collinearly with the first region and the second region; and the overlap region and the additional overlap region overlap in a hyper-overlap region that includes: a first circuit element that receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the first region using the first reticle aligned with the first region, a second circuit element that receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the second region using the second reticle aligned with the second region, and a third circuit element that receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the third region using the third reticle aligned with the third region (See fig. 2A, Para 26-30). As per Claims 9 and 16, Burton teaches the die of claim 1, wherein the overlap region includes a plurality of rows of the grid or a plurality of columns of the grid (See fig. 1). As per Claim 10, Burton teaches the die of claim 1, wherein the overlap set of circuit elements is divided into the first subset and the second subset in accordance with an ordered pattern (See fig. 2A). As per Claim 11, Burton teaches the die of claim 1, wherein the overlap set of circuit elements is divided into the first subset and the second subset in accordance with a randomized pattern (See fig. 4B). As per Claim 15, Burton teaches the method of claim 12, further comprising performing, while a third reticle is aligned with a third region of the die that overlaps the second region in an additional overlap region in which is disposed an additional overlap set of circuit elements from the array, the lithographic deposition of the first layer on the third region; wherein: the performing of the lithographic deposition of the first layer on the second region includes depositing the first layer to a third subset of the additional overlap set, and the performing of the lithographic deposition of the first layer on the third region includes depositing the first layer to a fourth subset of the additional overlap set (See fig. 2A, Para 26-30). As per Claim 17, Burton teaches the method of claim 12, wherein the overlap set of circuit elements is divided into the first subset and the second subset in accordance with a randomized pattern (Para 32). As per Claim 18, Burton teaches a set of reticles configured for use in a lithographic deposition of a first layer on a die being fabricated to include an array of circuit elements arranged in a grid (Para 18, Multi-reticle die of the present disclosure can be fabricated by overlapping a first reticle field with a second reticle field so that the first reticle field and the second reticle field have a common scribe zone), the set of reticles including: a first reticle configured to be aligned with a first region of the die (a first reticle field 402) for the lithographic deposition of the first layer on the first region; and a second reticle configured to be aligned with a second region of the die (a second reticle field 410) for the lithographic deposition of the first layer on the second region (See fig. 4B, Para 64); wherein: the first region overlaps the second region in an overlap region in which is disposed an overlap set of circuit elements from the array, the first reticle is configured for use in the lithographic deposition of the first layer to a first subset of the overlap set, and the second reticle is configured for use in the lithographic deposition of the first layer to a second subset of the overlap set (Para 15, the overlapping conductive interconnections extend into a common scribe zone between adjacent reticle fields). As per Claim 19, Burton teaches the set of reticles of claim 18, wherein the array of circuit elements includes an array of pixels and the die being fabricated implements an image sensor die configured to produce a photographic image based on light detected by the array of pixels (Para 32, wherein field effect transistors (FETs), finFETs, planar FETs, MOSFETs, as well as many other types of semiconductor devices). As per Claim 20, Burton teaches the set of reticles of claim 18, wherein: the overlap region includes a plurality of rows of the grid or a plurality of columns of the grid; and the overlap set of circuit elements is divided into the first subset and the second subset in accordance with a randomized pattern (See fig. 1). Claim(s) 1, 12 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hu et al. [US 20190164899 A1, hereafter Hu]. As per Claims 1, 12 and 18, Hu teaches a die (See fig. 1, die 100) comprising: a first region 110A and a second region 110B that overlap in an overlap region 110AB; an array of circuit elements arranged in a grid spanning the first region and the second region (See fig. 1); and an overlap set of circuit elements including circuit elements from the array that are disposed in the overlap region (Para 12), wherein: a first subset of the overlap set receives a lithographic deposition of a first layer as the first layer is deposited to the first region using a first reticle aligned with the first region, and a second subset of the overlap set receives the lithographic deposition of the first layer as the first layer is deposited to the second region using a second reticle aligned with the second region (Para 15-16). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MESFIN ASFAW whose telephone number is (571)270-5247. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MESFIN T ASFAW/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 12, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601981
RETICLE STORAGE POD AND METHOD FOR SECURING RETICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596308
MODULAR WAFER TABLE AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585194
METHOD AND SWAPPING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578656
EUV LIGHT GENERATION APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578658
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR THERMAL CONDITIONING OF RETICLES IN LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month