Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/763,040

MEMORY DEVICE WITH TUNABLE PROBABILISTIC STATE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Priority
Aug 30, 2019 — provisional 62/894,396 +2 more
Examiner
TRAN, MICHAEL THANH
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allowance Rate
1443 granted / 1507 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1529
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§102
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1507 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION In response to the Communications dated April 8, 2026, claims 1-16 and 18-21 are active in this application. Claim Objections Claims 3-5 and 7-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections- 35 U.S.C. § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. [CN 107404112 A]. With respect to claim 1, Zhang et al. disclose a probabilistic random number generator [fig. 7], comprising: a controller [61] comprising a plurality of control lines [CSb1-CSbn]: a memory cell [any MTJ of 60] comprising a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ); and a current source [CSs1-CSsn via CS1-CSn] coupled with the MTJ and the controller such that the current source is coupled between the MTJ and the controller, and wherein the current source comprises: a plurality of current paths [CSs1-CSsn via CS1-CSn has multiple paths, parallel to each other] disposed in parallel with one another; and a plurality of MTJs [60 is an array with a plurality of MTJs] on respective ones of the plurality of current paths, and coupled to respective ones of the plurality of control lines [the plurality of MTJ’s are coupled to the respective control lies [CSv1-CSbn via CS1-CSn]]. With respect to claim 2, Zhang et al. disclose a plurality of transistors [transistors (CS1-CSn] arranged on the plurality of current paths, respectively, wherein each current path includes a respective transistor and a respective MTJ arranged in series [transistors coupled to respective MTJ’s] on that current path. With respect to claim 6, Zhang et al. disclose the MTJ comprises: a ferromagnetic free layer [10]; a non-magnetic barrier layer overlying the ferromagnetic free layer [11]; and a ferromagnetic reference layer overlying the non-magnetic barrier layer [12]. Remarks Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15, 16 and 18-21 are allowable over the prior art of record. The following is an Examiner's statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art of records does not show (in addition to the other elements in the claim) the following: -with respect to claim 15, a controller configured to write a probabilistic random data state to the memory cell by applying a predetermined current pulse shape to the memory cell, wherein the predetermined current pulse shape is configured to switch the memory cell from a first stable data state to a second stable data state with a probability of between 5% and 95%. -with respect to claim 18, selecting a subset of predetermined current pulse shapes from a set of predetermined current pulse shapes, the set including a greater number of predetermined current pulse shapes than the subset, and applying the subset of predetermined current pulse shapes to the memory cell when the memory cell is in the first data state, wherein the subset of predetermined current pulse shapes have different current amplitudes and/or pulse widths corresponding to different switching probabilities to switch the memory cell from the first data state to a second data state. Conclusion For applicant’s benefit portions of the cited reference(s) have been cited to aid in the review of the rejection(s). While every attempt has been made to be thorough and consistent within the rejection it is noted that the PRIOR ART MUST BE CONSIDERED IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING DISCLOSURES THAT TEACH AWAY FROM THE CLAIMS. See MPEP 2141.02 VI. When responding to the Office action, Applicants are advised to provide the Examiner with line and page numbers of the application and/or references cited to assist the Examiner in the prosecution of this case. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to Michael T. Tran whose telephone number is (571) 272-1795. Interview agendas may be emailed to Michael.tran@uspto.gov. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 6:00AM-4:30 P.M. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application. should be directed to the Group receptionist whose telephone number is (571) 272-1650. /MICHAEL T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827 May 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed
May 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666606
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666623
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665013
MEMORY DEVICES INCLUDING MECHANISM OF PROTECTING A VULNERABLE WORD LINE BASED ON THE PREVIOUS REFRESHED WORD LINES AND RELEVANT METHODS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658246
THREE-TRANSISTOR EMBEDDED DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY GAIN CELL IN COMPLEMENTARY FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR PROCESS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646583
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR HALF-PAGE MODES OF MEMORY DEVICES
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+0.4%)
1y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1507 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month