Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/767,239

Zero Mask High Density Capacitor

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Priority
May 24, 2019 — provisional 62/852,406 +2 more
Examiner
TYNES JR., LAWRENCE C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
669 granted / 784 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
812
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 784 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12062652 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims are a broader representation of claims disclosed in US 12,062,652 B2 . US 12,062,652 Application 18/767,239 1. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: forming a plurality of first interconnect layers each having a length extending in a first direction and arranged along a second direction transverse to the first direction; forming a single piece of first resistive layer over the first interconnect layers; forming a dielectric layer over the first resistive layer; forming a second resistive layer over the dielectric layer; forming a plurality of second interconnect layers each having a length extending in the second direction and arranged along the first direction; and forming a plurality of vias interconnecting the second interconnect layers and the second resistive layer, each via having a length extending in a third direction transverse to the first and second directions. 1. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: forming a first resistive layer; forming a second resistive layer over the first resistive layer; forming a plurality of first interconnect layers each having a length extending in a first direction and arranged along a second direction; and forming a plurality of vias interconnecting the first interconnect layers and the second resistive layer, each via having a length extending in a third direction transverse to the first and second directions. 9. A semiconductor device comprising: a plurality of first interconnect layers each having a length extending in a first direction and arranged along a second direction transverse to the first direction; a single piece of first resistive layer over the first interconnect layers; a dielectric layer over the first resistive layer; a second resistive layer over the dielectric layer; a plurality of second interconnect layers each having a length extending in the second direction and arranged along the first direction; and a plurality of vias interconnecting the second interconnect layers and the second resistive layer, each via having a length extending in a third direction transverse to the first and second directions. 9. A semiconductor device comprising: a first resistive layer; a second resistive layer over the first resistive layer; a plurality of first interconnect layers each having a length extending in a first direction and arranged along a second direction; and a plurality of vias interconnecting the first interconnect layers and the second resistive layer, each via having a length extending in a third direction transverse to the first and second directions. 16. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: forming a plurality of first interconnect layers each having a length extending in a first direction and arranged in a second direction transverse to the first direction; forming a single piece of first resistive layer over the first interconnect layers; forming a dielectric layer over the first resistive layer; forming a second resistive layer over the dielectric layer, wherein the first resistive layer, the dielectric layer, and the second resistive layer are formed using a single mask; forming a plurality of second interconnect layers each having a length extending in the second direction and arranged along the first direction; and forming a plurality of vias interconnecting the second interconnect layers and the second resistive layer, each via having a length extending in a third direction transverse to the first and second directions. 16. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: forming a first resistive layer; forming a second resistive layer over the first resistive layer, wherein the first and second resistive layers are formed using a single mask; forming a plurality of first interconnect layers each having a length extending in a first direction and arranged along a second direction; and forming a plurality of vias interconnecting the first interconnect layers and the second resistive layer, each via having a length extending in a third direction transverse to the first and second directions. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAWRENCE C TYNES JR. whose telephone number is (571)270-7606. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Zandra Smith can be reached at 571-272-2429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAWRENCE C TYNES JR./Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708030
METHOD OF FILLING GAPS BETWEEN DIES USING SILICON DIOXIDE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707983
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707650
PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702036
ULTRA LOW LOSS ROUTING BETWEEN GLASS CORES
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685235
FINE PITCH CHIP INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE FOR BUMP BRIDGE AND HIGH TEMPERATURE STORAGE IMPROVEMENT AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 784 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month