Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/769,875

FINFETS WITH EPITAXY REGIONS HAVING MIXED WAVY AND NON-WAVY PORTIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Priority
Aug 13, 2020 — provisional 63/065,291 +3 more
Examiner
LEE, CHEUNG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1074 granted / 1165 resolved
+32.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1168
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1165 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang (US Pub. 2018/0151439). Regarding Claim 18, Huang discloses a device comprising: a first fin-group (first and second fins 111i, 111o from left side) and a second fin-group (first and second fins 111i, 111o from right side) (see fig. 4A), each comprising a plurality of semiconductor fins (111i, 111o) (page 2, paragraph 13); fin spacers (121a, 121b, 121c) on sidewalls of the plurality of semiconductor fins (111i, 111o) (page 4, paragraph 32) in the first fin-group (left side fins); a first epitaxy region (125, 129) (page 6, paragraph 53) over and contacting the first fin-group (left side fins) to form interfaces with the plurality of semiconductor fins (111i, 111o) (see fig. 4A), wherein topmost points of the interfaces are higher than topmost ends of the fin spacers (121a, 121b, 121c) (see fig. 4A); and a second epitaxy region (125, 129) over and contacting the second fin-group (right side fins) (see fig. 4A). Regarding Claim 20, Huang discloses further comprising: a source/drain contact plug 181’ (page 8, paragraph 76) electrically connecting the first epitaxy region (125, 129) (epitaxy regions formed over the first and second fins 111i, 111o from left side) to the second epitaxy region (125, 129) (epitaxy regions formed over the first and second fins 111i, 111o from right side) (see fig. 8A). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 19 recites the fin spacers comprise: a first outer fin spacer facing toward the second fin-group, wherein the first outer fin spacer has a first height; a second outer fin spacer facing away from the second fin-group, wherein the second outer fin spacer has a second height greater than the first height. These features in combination with the other elements of the base claim are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Claims 1-17 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 1 recites first portions having first top surfaces; and second portions having second top surfaces that are lower than the first top surfaces and higher than the dielectric isolation regions; a second fin-group comprising a fourth semiconductor fin, wherein inner-fin spacings in the first fin-group are smaller than an inter-fin spacing that separates the first fin-group from the second fin-group; and an epitaxy region contacting: an outer sidewall of the third semiconductor fin to form a first vertical interface; and an inner sidewall of the third semiconductor fin to form a second vertical interface, wherein the first vertical interface is shorter than the second vertical interface. Claim 13 recites each of the first fin-group and the second fin-group comprises a plurality of semiconductor fins having inner-group spacings, and wherein the first fin-group and the second fin-group are spaced apart from each other by an inter-group spacing greater than the inner-group spacings; the epitaxy region contacting the second semiconductor fin to form: a first vertical interface; and a second vertical interface, wherein the second vertical interface is between the first vertical interface and the first semiconductor fin, and wherein a first bottom end of the first vertical interface is higher than a second bottom end of the second vertical interface. These features in combination with the other elements of the claim are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Claims 2-12 and 14-17 variously depend from claim 1 or 13, so they are allowed for the same reason. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHEUNG LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-5977. The examiner can normally be reached 9 AM - 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVIENNE MONBLEAU can be reached at (571)272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHEUNG LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 August 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740392
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740132
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SOURCE/DRAIN CONTACT MOL CUT STRUCTURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740065
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727516
INTEGRATED CIRCUITS WITH SELECTABLE PACKAGING TYPES
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721010
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+4.3%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1165 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month