Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/772,202

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 14, 2024
Priority
Jun 30, 2020 — divisional of 11/373,971 +2 more
Examiner
MENZ, LAURA MARY
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
811 granted / 928 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
964
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 928 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1 in the reply filed on 12/29/25 is acknowledged. Newly submitted claims 21-30 are directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: Claims 21-30 pertain to a separate and distinct species from that of the originally elected claims. An exhaustive search has been conducted and the additional species would require a second burdensome search to determine the best applicable prior art. Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 21-30 are withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. To preserve a right to petition, the reply to this action must distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. Otherwise, the election shall be treated as a final election without traverse. Traversal must be timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are subsequently added, applicant must indicate which of the subsequently added claims are readable upon the elected invention. Should applicant traverse on the ground that the inventions are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the inventions to be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Yu et al (US 2006/0121717). (Original) A semiconductor device structure, comprising: one or more bonding pads (Fig.6 (118/116/114 ) and [0026]) disposed over a substrate (not depicted in drawings but described [0019]); and a first passivation layer (Fig.6 (124) and [0029]) disposed over the one or more bonding pads (Fig.6 (118/116/114) and [0026]), wherein the first passivation layer (Fig.6 (124) and [0029]) comprises: a first passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (124) and [0029]) comprising a first dielectric material (Fig.6 (124) and [0029-0030- SiC]); a second passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (120) and [0027]) disposed over the first passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (124) and [0029]), wherein the second passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (120) and [0027]) comprises a second dielectric material (Fig.6 (120) and [0027- silicon oxide or oxynitride]); and a third passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (122) and [0027]) disposed over the second passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (120) and [0027]), wherein the third passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (122) and [0027]) comprises a third dielectric material (Fig.6 (122) and [0027- silicon nitride]) different from the first ([0030-SiC]) and second dielectric materials [0027- silicon oxide or oxynitride]. 7. (Original) The semiconductor device structure of claim 1, wherein the third passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (122) and [0027]) further comprises a trench (Fig.6 (trench unlabeled but depicted). Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Kim et al (US 2007/0023860). A semiconductor device structure, comprising: one or more bonding pads (Fig.4B (120b) and [0050]) disposed over a substrate (Fig.4B (100) and [0047]); and a first passivation layer (Fig.4B (P) and [0050]) disposed over the one or more bonding pads (Fig.4B (120b) and [0050]), wherein the first passivation layer (Fig.4B (P) and [0050]) comprises: a first passivation sublayer (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) comprising a first dielectric material ([0050- note 125 is a multilayer because it dis taught to comprise “at least one material”- thus teaching it could be more than one material]); a second passivation sublayer (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) disposed over the first passivation sublayer (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]), wherein the second passivation sublayer (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) comprises a second dielectric material ([0050- note 125 is a multilayer because it dis taught to comprise “at least one material”- thus teaching it could be more than one material]); and a third passivation sublayer (Fig.4B (130) and [0050]) disposed over the second passivation sublayer (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]), wherein the third passivation sublayer (Fig.4B (130) and [0050]) comprises a third dielectric material [0050- silicon nitride] different from the first and second dielectric materials [0050-oxides]. 2. (Original) The semiconductor device structure of claim 1, wherein the first dielectric material (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) comprises a first oxide [0050- teaching layer 125 can be a multilayer including USG], the second dielectric material (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) comprises a second oxide [0050- teaching 125 can be a multilayer including HDP oxide], and the third dielectric material (Fig. 4B (130) and [0050])comprises a first nitride [0050- teaching 130 includes silicon nitride]. 3. (Original) The semiconductor device structure of claim 2, wherein the first oxide (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050- teaching layer 125 can be a multilayer including USG]) is undoped silica glass, and the second oxide (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050- teaching 125 can be a multilayer including HDP oxide]) is a high density plasma oxide, and the first nitride (Fig. 4B (130) and [0050- teaching 130 includes silicon nitride]) is silicon nitride. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al (US 2006/0121717) in further view of Kim et al (US 2007/0023860). Yu teaches the limitations of claim 1 as cited above, and further teaches the limitations of claim 4 as cited below: 4. (Original) The semiconductor device structure, wherein the first passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (124) and [0029]) has a first thickness [0029- thickness starting at 300 A], the second passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (120) and [0027]) has a second thickness substantially greater than the first thickness [0027- thickness starting at 1000 A], and the third passivation sublayer (Fig.6 (122) and [0027]) has a third thickness substantially greater than the first thickness [0027- thickness starting at 1000 A]. However claim 4 depends upon claim 2. Yu teaches the second sublayer is an oxide and the third is a nitride [0027]; however Yu does not teach the first passivation sublayer is an oxide as required in claim 2. Claim 2 recites: 2. (Original) The semiconductor device structure of claim 1, wherein the first dielectric material comprises a first oxide, the second dielectric material comprises a second oxide, and the third dielectric material comprises a first nitride. Kim teaches the limitations of claim 2 as follows: 2. (Original) The semiconductor device structure of claim 1, wherein the first dielectric material (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) comprises a first oxide [0050- teaching layer 125 can be a multilayer including USG], the second dielectric material (Fig. 4B (125) and [0050]) comprises a second oxide [0050- teaching 125 can be a multilayer including HDP oxide], and the third dielectric material (Fig. 4B (130) and [0050])comprises a first nitride [0050- teaching 130 includes silicon nitride]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify Yu’s teachings to include a first passivation sublayer including an oxide because as Kim teaches oxide materials are effective passivators [0050] for contact pad applications. Moreover oxides are well-known recognized passivating materials as known in the art and a passivation layer can theoretically be divided into a multitude of sublayers. Therefore the combination of claims 1-2 and 4 is considered obvious. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Walter et al (US 2013/0234300); Tsai et al (US 6017614); and Hsiao (US 6277725) teach similar structures. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA M MENZ whose telephone number is (571)272-1697. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Gauthier can be reached at 571-270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA M MENZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813 3/4/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 11, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12642071
SCALABLE ARCHITECTURE FOR MULTI-DIE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642137
MULTI-LAYER CHIP ARCHITECTURE AND FABRICATION
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642138
Three Dimensional Application-Specific Integrated Circuit Architecture
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642144
Multi-Bump Connection to Interconnect Structure and Manufacturing Method Thereof
2y 12m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635579
CHIP PACKAGE STRUCTURES, MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 928 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month