Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/775,130

INTEGRATED CHIP WITH INTER-WIRE CAVITIES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 17, 2024
Priority
Jun 23, 2021 — divisional of 11/842,966 +1 more
Examiner
CLINTON, EVAN GARRETT
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
516 granted / 582 resolved
+28.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.7%
+19.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 10 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xia et al. (U.S. publication No. 2009/0093100). Regarding claim 1, Xia teaches an integrated chip comprising: a first conductive wire (Fig. 1F, left wire 109) over a substrate (101); a second conductive wire (middle wire 105) over the substrate and laterally spaced from the first conductive wire (Fig. 1F); a dielectric cap (111) laterally between the first conductive wire and the second conductive wire (Fig. 1F); and a capping layer (115) over the second conductive wire and extending toward the first conductive wire beyond a sidewall of the second conductive wire (Fig. 1F). Regarding claim 2, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 1, further comprising: an etch stop layer (layer 104) between the first conductive wire and the second conductive wire and spaced below the dielectric cap. Regarding claim 3, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 2, wherein the etch stop layer is on a sidewall of the first conductive wire and on the sidewall of the second conductive wire (see Fig. 1F, on a portion of the sidewalls at the bottom). Regarding claim 4, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 3, wherein the capping layer is directly over the second conductive wire and the etch stop layer (Fig. 1F). Regarding claim 5, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 2, wherein a lower surface of the dielectric cap, an upper surface of the etch stop layer, and a conductive sidewall of the first conductive wire partially delimit a cavity that is between the first conductive wire and the second conductive wire (Fig. 1F, cavity 114). Regarding claim 6, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 1, wherein a sidewall of the capping layer is laterally offset from the sidewall of the second conductive wire in the direction of the first conductive wire (Fig. 1F). Regarding claim 7, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 1, further comprising: a dielectric layer (107) under the capping layer and between a sidewall of the dielectric cap and the sidewall of the second conductive wire (Fig. 1F). Regarding claim 10, Xia teaches an integrated chip comprising: a first conductive wire (Fig. 1F, left wire 109) over a substrate (101); a second conductive wire (middle wire 109) over the substrate and laterally spaced from the first conductive wire (Fig. 1F); a dielectric cap (111) over a cavity (114) and laterally between a sidewall of the first conductive wire and a sidewall of the second conductive wire (Fig. 1F); and a dielectric layer (107) between the sidewall of the second conductive wire and a sidewall of the dielectric cap. Regarding claim 13, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 10, further comprising: an etch stop layer (etch stop 104) under the cavity, under the dielectric layer, and laterally between the sidewall of the first conductive wire and the sidewall of the second conductive wire (Fig. 1F). Regarding claim 14, Xia teaches the integrated chip of claim 13, wherein the dielectric layer extends from a top of the second conductive wire and a top of the dielectric cap to a top of the etch stop layer (Fig. 1F). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-9 and 11-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 15-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 8, the prior art, alone or in combination, fails to teach or suggest a conductive sidewall of the first conductive wire partially delimit a cavity that is between the first conductive wire and the second conductive wire. Regarding claims 9, the prior art, alone or in combination, fails to teach wherein the dielectric layer separates the dielectric cap from the second conductive wire, and wherein the dielectric cap is on a sidewall of the first conductive wire. Regarding claims 11-12, the prior art, alone or in combination, fails to teach or suggest wherein the dielectric cap extends from the sidewall of the first conductive wire to a sidewall of the dielectric layer, and wherein the dielectric layer extends from the sidewall of the dielectric cap to the sidewall of the second conductive wire. Regarding claims 15-20, the prior art, alone or in combination, fails to teach or suggest a first conductive wire over the first conductive via and extending beyond a sidewall of the first conductive via to over the first dielectric cap. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Evan G Clinton whose telephone number is (571)270-0525. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday at 8:30am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Zandra Smith can be reached at 571-272-2429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EVAN G CLINTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751295
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751088
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745648
MICROELECTRONIC ASSEMBLY HAVING ANTIFERROMAGNETIC FILM STRUCTURE THEREIN
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745652
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745685
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.4%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month