Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/776,346

SEMICONDUCTOR ON INSULATOR HAVING A SEMICONDUCTOR LAYER WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESSES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Priority
Jul 15, 2021 — divisional of 12/170,284
Examiner
CRAWFORD EASON, LATANYA N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 931 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 931 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 & 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen (US Pub no. 2011/0212579 A1) Regarding claim 1, Chen et al discloses An integrated chip (IC), comprising: a semiconductor substrate(200)[0025]; a semiconductor layer(222) disposed over the semiconductor substrate(200)[0032]; and an insulating structure (210)buried between the semiconductor substrate(200) and the semiconductor layer(222)[0032], wherein: the insulating structure(210) has a first region(202) and a second region(204)[0028]; the insulating structure (210)has a first thickness (tcore)in the first region (202)of the insulating structure(210); and the insulating structure(210) has a second thickness (t I/O)different than the first thickness in the second region (204)of the insulating structure(210) fig. 2c/ fig. 2e[0030]. Regarding claim 2, Chen et al discloses wherein the semiconductor layer (222)has a substantially planar upper surface fig. 2e. Regarding claim 5, Chen et al discloses further comprising: a pair of first source/drain regions (see fig. 2e)disposed in the semiconductor layer(222) and directly over the first region(202) of the insulating structure(210) [0038]; and a pair of second source/drain regions (see fig. 2e)disposed in the semiconductor layer (222)and spaced from the first source/drain regions fig. 2e, wherein the second source/drain regions are disposed directly over the second region (204)of the insulating structure(210) fig. 2e. Regarding claim 6, Chen et al discloses further comprising: a first gate dielectric disposed over the semiconductor layer and between the first source/drain regions (gate dielectric and source/drain features shown in fig. 2e)[0038], wherein the first gate dielectric is spaced from the semiconductor substrate by a first distance(gate dielectric and source/drain features shown in fig. 2e)[0038]; and a second gate dielectric disposed over the semiconductor layer (222)and between the second source/drain regions(gate dielectric and source/drain features shown in fig. 2e)[0038], wherein the second gate dielectric is spaced from the semiconductor substrate by a second distance that is substantially the same as the first distance(gate dielectric and source/drain features shown in fig. 2e). Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Holt (US Pub no. 2006/0214225 A1). Regarding claim 1, Holt et al discloses An integrated chip (IC) fig. 3a, comprising: a semiconductor substrate(22)[0042]; a semiconductor layer (12)disposed over the semiconductor substrate(22)[0042]; and an insulating structure (16)buried between the semiconductor substrate(22) and the semiconductor layer(12) fig. 3a), wherein: the insulating structure(16) has a first region (42)and a second region(44)[0049]; the insulating structure (16)has a first thickness in the first region(42) of the insulating structure(16); and the insulating structure(16) has a second thickness different than the first thickness in the second region of the insulating structure(16) fig. 3a[0020]. Regarding claim 2, Holt et al discloses wherein the semiconductor layer (12)has a substantially planar upper surface fig. 3a. Regarding claim 3, Holt et al discloses wherein the semiconductor substrate(22) has a substantially planar upper surface fig. 3a. Regarding claim 4, Holt et al discloses wherein: the insulating structure(16) comprises one or more dielectric layers[0024] and one or more filler structures(40); and the one or more dielectric layers [0024]separate the one or more filler structures(40) from both the semiconductor substrate(22) and the semiconductor layer(16). Regarding claim 5, Holt et al discloses further comprising: a pair of first source/drain regions (42-source/drain)disposed in the semiconductor layer [0050]and directly over the first region(42) of the insulating structure(16); and a pair of second source/drain regions(44-source drain) disposed in the semiconductor layer (12)and spaced from the first source/drain regions(42-source/drain), wherein the second source/drain regions(44-source/drain) are disposed directly over the second region of the insulating structure(16) [0050] fig. 3a. Regarding claim 6, Holt et al discloses further comprising: a first gate dielectric disposed over the semiconductor layer (12) and between the first source/drain regions[0050], wherein the first gate dielectric is spaced from the semiconductor substrate (22)by a first distance[0050]; and a second gate dielectric disposed over the semiconductor layer (12)and between the second source/drain regions [0050] wherein the second gate dielectric is spaced from the semiconductor substrate (22)by a second distance that is substantially the same as the first distance[0050] fig. fig. 3a/3b. Claim(s) 10-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by An (US Patent 6,414,355 B1) Regarding claim 10, An et al discloses an integrated chip (IC), comprising: a semiconductor substrate(16) (col. 4, lines 14-15); an insulating structure(30/14) disposed over the semiconductor substrate(16); and a semiconductor layer (12”)disposed over the insulating structure(30/14)(col. 4. Lines 64-65), wherein: an upper surface of the semiconductor layer(12”) is substantially planar fig. 7e; the upper surface of the semiconductor layer(12”) overlies both a first lower surface of the semiconductor layer(thicker areas of 12”) and a second lower surface of the semiconductor layer(thinner areas of 12”) (col. 5 lines 5-12); the first lower surface of the semiconductor layer(thicker areas of 12”) is vertically spaced from the upper surface of the semiconductor layer(12”) by a first distance fig. 7e; and the second lower surface of the semiconductor layer (thinner areas of 12”) is vertically spaced from the upper surface of the semiconductor layer by a second distance different than the first distance fig. 7e(col. 5 lines 5-12). Regarding claim 11, An et al discloses wherein a sidewall of the semiconductor layer (12”)extends continuously from the first lower surface of the semiconductor layer to the second lower surface of the semiconductor layer(12”) fig. 7e. Regarding claim 12, An et al discloses wherein the sidewall of the semiconductor layer (12”)is substantially vertical(fig. 7e). Regarding claim 13, An et al discloses further comprising: a first isolation structure (18 of region 22d)disposed in the semiconductor layer (12”)and over the first lower surface of the semiconductor layer(thicker areas of 12”)(Col 2, lines 64-65) fig. 7e, wherein a bottom surface of the first isolation structure(18 of region 22d) is vertically spaced a third distance from the semiconductor substrate(12”) fig. 7e/1a; and a second isolation structure (18 of region 22a))disposed in the semiconductor layer (12”)and over the second lower surface of the semiconductor layer(thinner areas of 12”), wherein a bottom surface of the second isolation structure is vertically spaced from the semiconductor substrate a fourth distance different than the third distance fig. 7e. Regarding claim 14, An et al discloses further comprising: a pair of first source/drain regions (claim 8)disposed in the semiconductor layer(12”) and directly over the first lower surface of the semiconductor layer(thicker areas of 12”)(claim 8) fig. 7e; and a pair of second source/drain regions(claim 10) disposed in the semiconductor layer (12”)and spaced from the first source/drain regions, wherein the second source/drain regions are disposed directly over the second lower surface of the semiconductor layer (thicker areas of 12”)claim 10 fig. 7e. Regarding claim 15, An et al discloses wherein: the first source/drain regions(claim 8) are vertically spaced from the semiconductor substrate (16)a fifth distance fig. 7e; and the second source/drain regions (claim 10)are vertically spaced from the semiconductor substrate(16) a sixth distance different than the fifth distance fig. 7e. Claim(s) 16 , 19, & 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chang (US Pub no 2010/0213548 A1). Regarding claim 16, Chang et al discloses An integrated chip (IC), comprising: a semiconductor substrate(30) [0028]; an insulating structure (61/39)disposed over the semiconductor substrate(30)[0029], wherein the insulating structure(61/39) comprises a first region(transistor region 210) having a first upper surface(61 /39 of 210) and a second region (transistor region 110)having a second upper surface(61 /39 of 110) below the first upper surface(fig. 3c), the first region (transistor region 210)comprising one or more dielectric materials (61/39)continuously wrapping around one or more filler structures(region 216)[0043][0041] fig. 3c; a semiconductor layer(214) disposed over the insulating structure(61/39)[0043], the semiconductor layer(214) having a first thickness over the first upper surface (61 /39 of 210)and a second thickness over the second upper surface(61 /39 of 110), the first thickness being smaller than the second thickness(fig. 3c)[0046][0029]; a first semiconductor device(210) disposed directly over the first upper surface(61 /39 of 210); and a second semiconductor device(110) disposed directly over the second upper surface. 61 /39 of 110)[0040]. Regarding claim 19, Chang et al discloses wherein the first semiconductor device comprises a first gate structure(212) arranged between first source/drain regions(213) disposed within the semiconductor layer(214)[0040]; and wherein the second semiconductor device(110) comprises a second gate structure(112) arranged between second source/drain regions (113)disposed within the semiconductor layer(114), the first source/drain regions(113) having a smaller depth than the second source/drain regions(214)(fig. 3c). Regarding claim 20, Chang et al discloses wherein the one or more filler structures (216) within the first region (transistor region 210)comprise a semiconductor material having a bottommost surface[0041] fig. 3c, the bottommost surface being vertically above a topmost surface of the one or more dielectric materials (61)in the second region(transistor region 110) fig. 3c. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Holt (US Pub no. 2006/0214225 A1) in view of Krishnan US Patent 6,492,209 B1). Regarding claim 7, Holt et al discloses all the claim limitations of claim 5 and further teach the first source/drain regions extend into the semiconductor layer a third distance; and the second source/drain regions extend into the semiconductor layer a fourth distance but fails to teach a fourth distance different than the third distance. However, Krishnan et al discloses having a first source/drain regions(104/104-112) a third distance and a second source/drain regions (104/106-114)extend a fourth distance different than the third distance(column 4 lines 60-61). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Holt et al with the teachings of Krishnan et al to reduce threshold voltage shifts. Regarding claim 8, Krishnan et al discloses wherein: the first source/drain regions (104/104-112)extend vertically from an upper surface of the semiconductor layer(60)to the insulating structure(70/94); and the second source/drain regions((104/106-114)extend vertically from the upper surface of the semiconductor layer (60) to the insulating structure(70/94) (col. 4, lines 45-62) Regarding claim 9, Krishnan et al discloses wherein: the first source/drain regions(104/104-112) extend vertically from an upper surface of the semiconductor layer to the insulating structure(70/94); the second source/drain regions(104/104-114) extend vertically into the semiconductor layer (60)from the upper surface of the semiconductor layer(60); and the second source/drain regions(104/104-114) are vertically spaced from the insulating structure(70/94). Claim(s) 17 & 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang (US Pub no 2010/0213548 A1) in view of Waite (US Pub no 2006/0118918 A1). Regarding claim 17, Chang et al discloses all the claim limitations of claim 16 and further teaches dielectric layers(61/39) disposed on sidewalls and an upper surface of the one or more filler (116/216) fig. 3c but fails to teach wherein the one or more dielectric materials comprise a first dielectric layer disposed along a lower surface of the one or more filler structures However, Waite et al discloses a semiconductor device comprising an insulating material (48) isolating a lower surface of a silicon layer (19)[0032][0034] fig. 14-fig. 16. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Chang et al with the teachings of Waite et al such that the one or more dielectric materials comprise a first dielectric layer disposed along a lower surface of the one or more filler structures and a second dielectric layer disposed on sidewalls and an upper surface of the one or more filler structures and further disposed on an upper surface of the first dielectric layer results to provide isolation and improve hole mobility. Regarding claim 18, Chang et al in view of Waite et al discloses the claim limitations of claim 17.Change et al fails to teach wherein the upper surface of the first dielectric layer contacts a lower surface of the second dielectric layer along an interface that spans an entirety of the second upper surface. However, Waite et al discloses an upper surface of a dielectric layer (24-48)contacts a lower surface of the second dielectric layer (14-48)along an interface that spans an entirety of the second upper surface[0035].It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Chang et al with the teachings of Waite et al such that wherein the upper surface of the first dielectric layer contacts a lower surface of the second dielectric layer along an interface that spans an entirety of the second upper surface results to provide isolation and improved hole mobility. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LATANYA N CRAWFORD EASON whose telephone number is (571)270-3208. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30 AM-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B Gauthier can be reached at (571)270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LATANYA N CRAWFORD EASON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707768
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701717
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12672400
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12642008
MEMORY DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DIE
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641932
Display Device
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+0.5%)
2y 8m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 931 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month