Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/785,022

SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING TOOL AND METHODS OF OPERATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 30, 2021 — provisional 63/201,462 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, KIET TUAN
Art Unit
2881
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
612 granted / 689 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
707
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§103
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 689 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) The claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 8-10, 12-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Terajima Shigeru (JP 2011129800 A). Terajima Shigeru (JP 2011129800 A) discloses, in figs. 1-7, an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) apparatus including an exposure tool, which includes Regarding claims 1, 8, 10, 15, providing, during the exposure operation, a flow of a gas across one or more mirrors included in the EUV lithography tool (see figs. 1-2, 4-7); performing, using an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography tool, while providing the flow of the gas to reduce possibility of contaminants from reaching the one or more mirrors of the EUV exposure tool during an exposure operation, an exposure operation to expose a semiconductor substrate to radiation to transfer a pattern from a reticle to the semiconductor substrate (see figs. 1-2, 4-7); initiating a flow of a gas, prior to initiating an exposure operation, across one or more mirrors included in an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography tool (see figs. 1-2, 4-7), wherein the flow of the gas is provided across one or more mirrors using one or more gas inlets 22 of the EUV lithography tool (see figs. 1-2, 4-7); and performing, after initiating the flow of the gas and using the EUV lithography tool, an exposure operation to expose a semiconductor substrate to radiation to transfer a pattern from a reticle to the semiconductor substrate (see figs. 1-2, 4-7), wherein the flow of the gas is provided across the one or more mirrors during the exposure operation (see figs. 1-2, 4-7). Regarding claims 2, 18, wherein the contaminants include at least one of: carbon (C), or tin (Sn) (see 6th para. of Background-Art; 3rd , 4th , 7th paras. of first embodiment; 3rd para. of second embodiment; 1st , 3rd , 4th , 5th paras. of third embodiment; 2nd , 5th paras. of fourth embodiment). Regarding claims 3, 9, wherein the gas includes hydrogen (H₂) (see 7th para. of Background-Art; 1st , 2nd , 5th , 6th , 7th , 8th paras. of fourth embodiment). Regarding claim 5, wherein providing the flow of the gas across the one or more mirrors comprises at least one of: providing the flow of the gas across one or more first mirrors included in an illuminator of the EUV exposure tool, or providing the flow of the gas across one or more second mirrors included in a projection optics box (POB) of the EUV exposure tool (see figs. 1-2, 4-7; Abstract; Technical Field; paragraphs 2, 4, 7 and 8 of first embodiment; paragraphs 2 and 3 of Third embodiment; claims). Regarding claims 12, 16, 17, 20, wherein the gas collects byproducts which are formed by interacting oxygen and carbon for forming carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the exposure operation before landing on the one or more mirrors (see paragraphs 3-4 and 7 of first embodiment); and wherein the method further comprises an exhaust system 21 for pumping, vacuuming or removing the byproducts out of the EUV lithography tool (see 6th , 7th paras. of Background-Art; paras. 1, 3-5, 7-9 of first embodiment; paras. 1, 3-6 of second embodiment; paras. 1, 3, 5-6 of third embodiment; paras. 2, 4, 8 of fourth embodiment). Regarding claim 13, wherein providing the flow of the gas into an illuminator of the EUV lithography tool using one or more gas inlets 22 associated with the illuminator (see the inlets 22 in figs. 1-2, 4-7). Regarding claim 14, wherein providing the flow of the gas into a projection optics box of the EUV lithography tool using one or more gas inlets associated with the projection optics box (see the inlets in figs. 1-2, 4-7). Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g) prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(a). Claims 6-7 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Terajima Shigeru (JP 2011129800 A) in view of Moser et al. (2019/0302624). Terajima Shigeru (JP 2011129800 A) discloses all the features as discussed above except a field facet mirror (FFM) as recited in claim 6; a pupil facet mirror (PFM) as recited in claim 7; and tin (Sn) contaminants as recited in claim 19. Using the field facet mirror (FFM), the pupil facet mirror (PFM), and tin (Sn) contaminants is considered to be obvious variation in design, since it is well known in the art as Moser et al. (2019/0302624) discloses, in figs. 1-9, an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) apparatus including an exposure tool, which includes a field facet mirror (FFM) 3 (see fig. 9, [0051]); a pupil facet mirror (PFM) 4 (see fig. 9, [0051]); and tin (Sn) contaminants (the contaminant material is generated based on using the target material for generating EUV), (see [0006], [0007], [0054], [0059]), thus would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to use the field facet mirror (FFM), the pupil facet mirror (PFM), and tin (Sn) contaminants in the Terajima Shigeru (JP 2011129800 A) extreme ultraviolet (EUV) apparatus for transferring patterns from reticle on a semiconductor substrate. Claims 4 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The Reasons for Allowable Subject Matter The prior art fails to disclose a method for reducing or removing contaminants from reaching one or more mirrors of an EUV exposure tool, which includes providing a flow of a gas in a flow rate range of approximately 10 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM) to approximately 300 SCCM as recited in claims 4 and 11. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 1) Jonkers et al. (2009/0206279) discloses a method for removing contaminant particles from mirrors in a mirror chamber of a lithography device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIET TUAN NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2479. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8-6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert H. Kim can be reached on 571-272-2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 703-872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /KIET T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770819
High-Voltage Insulating Structure, Charged Particle Gun, and Charged Particle Beam Device
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768804
METHOD OF 3D VOLUME INSPECTION OF SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS WITH INCREASED THROUGHPUT
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12755930
CHARGED PARTICLE BEAM WRITING APPARATUS, DISCHARGE DETECTION METHOD, AND DISCHARGE DETECTION APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12734732
DEVICE FOR PRE-ACTIVATING AND DOSING AN ACTINICALLY CURABLE COMPOUND AND USE OF THE DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731703
SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR VARIABLE COLLIMATION OF A NEUTRON BEAM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+0.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 689 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month