Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/786,268

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Priority
Aug 20, 2021 — divisional of 12/382,629
Examiner
TRICE III, WILLIAM CLARENCE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
45 granted / 55 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
59.7%
+19.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 55 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 18 and dependent claims are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 18 and dependent claims recites the antecedent basis for “a first direction” twice once in “each row of the array of semiconductor devices extending in a first direction” in claim 18 and once in “a stack of a plurality of insulating layers and sacrificial layers alternatively stacking on top of each other, and extending in a first direction” in claim 18. The second instance should be corrected such that it reads “the first direction” or establishes a new/different antecedent basis Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being by US 11251199 B2 Zhang et al hereafter “Zhang”. Claim 9 Zhang A method of making a semiconductor device, comprising: forming a stack (comprising 32 and 42 fig. 3A-3C) of a plurality of insulating layers (32 fig. 3A-3C) and sacrificial layers (42 fig. 3A-3C) alternatively stacking on top of each other [sufficiently illustrated fig. 3A-3C], and extending in a first direction (hd1 fig. 3A-3C); forming a plurality of gate layers (46 fig. 13A-13C) by replacing the plurality of sacrificial layers [sufficiently illustrated steps of fig. 11A-13C]; forming a memory layer (54 fig. 5A-5C) extending along the first direction and coupled to the plurality of gate layers in a second direction (hd2 fig. 5A-5C) perpendicular to the first direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 8A-8C]; forming a channel layer (60 fig. 10A-10C) extending along the first direction and coupled to the memory layer in the second direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 10A-10C]; and forming a source and a drain (63 and 61 fig. 8A-8C) spaced apart from the source in the first direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 8A-8C]. Claim 18 Zhang teaches a method of making a semiconductor device, comprising: forming an array of semiconductor devices (illustrated fig. 16A-16G), each row [sufficiently illustrated fig. 16A-16G] of the array of semiconductor devices extending in a first direction (hd1 fig. 16A-16G), the forming of each semiconductor device comprising: forming a stack (42 and 32 fig. 3A-3C) of a plurality of insulating layers (32 fig. 3A-3C) and sacrificial layers (42 fig. 3A-3C) alternatively stacking on top of each other, and extending in a first direction ; forming a plurality of gate layers (46 fig. 13A-13C) by replacing the plurality of sacrificial layers [sufficiently illustrated in the steps of fig. 11A-13C]; forming a memory layer (54 fig. 5A-5C) extending along the first direction and coupled to the plurality of gate layers in a second direction (hd2 fig. 5A-5C) perpendicular to the first direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 5A-5C]; forming a channel layer (60 fig. 10A-10C) extending along the first direction and coupled to the memory layer in the second direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 5A-5C]; and forming a source and a drain (61 and 63 fig. 8A-8C) spaced apart from the source in the first direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 8A-8C]. Claims 1-2, 6-8, 10-13, 16-17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang as applied to the claims above, and further in view of US 20190319044 A1 Harari et al hereafter “Harari” Claim 1 Zhang teaches a method of making a semiconductor device, comprising: providing a stack (comprising at least 32 and 42 Fig. 3A-3C) comprising a plurality of insulating layers (32 fig. 3A-3C) and a plurality of sacrificial layers (32 and 42 fig. 3A-3C) alternatively stacked on top of each other, the stack extending in a first direction (hd1 fig. 3A-3C forming a plurality of gate layers (comprising 46 fig. 13A-13C) by replacing the plurality of sacrificial layers [sufficiently illustrated fig. 11A-13C]; forming a memory layer (54 fig. 5A-5C) extending along the first direction radially inwards of and coupled to the plurality of gate layers in a second direction (hd2 fig. 5A-5C) perpendicular to the first direction; forming a channel layer (60 fig. 10A-10C) extending along the first direction and coupled to a radially inner surface of the memory layer in the second direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 10A-10C]; and forming a source and a drain (61 and 63 fig. 8A-8C) spaced apart from the source in the first direction. Zhang does not teach forming a contact structure having a lower resistance than the channel layer, Nor the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of the source and/or the drain. Harari teaches a contact structure (754 and/or 755 fig. 7d-1) having a lower resistance than a channel layer (comprising 756 and 757 fig. 7d-1) [Sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130, wherein contact structures 754 and 755 are disclosed as heavily doped polysilicon in “N+ doped polysilicon” and channel layer 756 and 757 are disclosed as lightly doped polysilicon “P- doped polysilicon”], the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of a source and/or a drain [sufficiently illustrated fig. 7d-1]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that “a contact structure having a lower resistance than the channel layer, and the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of the source and/or the drain”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to reduce undesirable thermal diffusion of the dopants from the source/drains into the channel [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari “Because of the relatively significantly higher conductivity of the metallic material at the core, the N-type doping concentration of the ultra-thin N+ doped polysilicon can be reduced by one or two orders of magnitude, reducing undesirable thermal diffusion of the N-type dopant into the P-type dopant of the channel”]. In addition, combining equivalents known for the same purpose is prima facie type obviousness [See MPEP 2144.06]. In this case it is combining known methods of manufacturing Three-dimensional vertical transistor structures with lateral channels for the purposes of forming memory and/or storage device. Claim 2 Zhang in view of Harari teaches the method of claim 1, wherein forming the contact structure comprises: forming a first contact structure wrapping around the drain [met in view of the modification in view of Harari as shown above, Harari 755 and/or 754 fig. 7d-1]; and forming a second contact structure wrapping around the source [met in view of the modification in view of Harari as shown above, Harari 755 and/or 754 fig. 7d-1]. Claim 6 Zhang in view of Harari teach as shown above the method of claim 2, wherein the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is about equal to a second contact structure width of the second contact structure [disclosed with sufficient specificity Paragraph 0130 Harari “each of thickness between 5 and 15 nanometers” and/or they each have a width in the same range of 5-15 under broadest reasonable interpretation]. Alternatively, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that “the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is about equal to a second contact structure width of the second contact structure”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to as a part of routine optimization of the contact structure widths and the result effected variable thermal diffusion and/or buffer for thermal diffusion provided between the source/drain and the channel layer [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari]. Claim 7 Zhang in view of Harari teach as shown above the method of claim 2, wherein the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is different from a second contact structure width of the second contact structure [disclosed with sufficient specificity Harari Paragraph 0130 “each of thickness between 5 and 15 nanometers” an embodiment wherein the widths are different such as 5 nanometers and 15 nanometers at the extreme ends of the range]. Alternatively, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that “the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is different from a second contact structure width of the second contact structure”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to as a part of routine optimization of the contact structure widths and the result effected variable thermal diffusion and/or buffer for thermal diffusion provided between the source/drain and the channel layer [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari]. Claim 8 Zhang in view of Harari teach as shown above the method of claim 1, further comprising: forming a stack (comprising 52 and 46 fig. 23A-24C) disposed on a radially outer surface of the memory layer in the second direction [sufficiently illustrated fig. 23A-23B], the stack comprising a plurality of insulating layers and the plurality of gate layers alternatively stacked on top each other [sufficiently illustrated fig. 23A-23 the plurality of insulating layer and plurality of gate layers alternatively stack on top each corresponding to a plurality of memory layers (sets of “memory layer – insulating layer – gate layer- insulating layer – memory layer” wherein insulating layer – gate layer – insulating layer” is an alternating stack), met under broadest reasonable interpretation]. Claim 10 Zhang teaches as shown above the method of claim 9, Zhang does not teach forming a contact structure. Harari teaches forming a contact structure (754 and 755 fig. 7D-1) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that the method includes “forming a contact structure”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to reduce undesirable thermal diffusion of the dopants from the source/drains into the channel [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari “Because of the relatively significantly higher conductivity of the metallic material at the core, the N-type doping concentration of the ultra-thin N+ doped polysilicon can be reduced by one or two orders of magnitude, reducing undesirable thermal diffusion of the N-type dopant into the P-type dopant of the channel”]. Claim 11 Zhang in view of Harari teaches as shown above the method of claim 10, wherein the contact structure has a lower resistance than the channel layer [met in view of Harari sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130, wherein contact structures 754 and 755 are disclosed as heavily doped polysilicon in “N+ doped polysilicon” and channel layer 756 and 757 are disclosed as lightly doped polysilicon “P- doped polysilicon”]. Claim 12 Zhang in view of Harari teaches as shown above the method of claim 11, wherein the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of the source and/or the drain [necessarily met in view of Harari as shown above to enable reduced thermal diffusion of dopants from the source/drain to the channel, sufficiently illustrated Harari fig. 7d-1]. Claim 13 Zhang in view of Harari teaches as shown above the method of claim 11, wherein forming the contact structure comprises: forming a first contact structure wrapping around the drain [met in view of Harari sufficiently illustrated Harari fig. 7d-1, to enable reduced thermal diffusion of dopants from the source/drain to the channel]; and forming a second contact structure wrapping around the source [met in view of Harari sufficiently illustrated Harari fig. 7d-1, to enable reduced thermal diffusion of dopants from the source/drain to the channel]. Claim 16 Zhang in view of Harari teaches as shown above the method of claim 13, wherein the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is about equal to a second contact structure width of the second contact structure [disclosed with sufficient specificity Paragraph 0130 Harari “each of thickness between 5 and 15 nanometers” and/or they each have a width in the same range of 5-15 under broadest reasonable interpretation]. Alternatively, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that “the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is about equal to a second contact structure width of the second contact structure”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to as a part of routine optimization of the contact structure widths and the result effected variable thermal diffusion and/or buffer for thermal diffusion provided between the source/drain and the channel layer [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari]. Claim 17 Zhang in view of Harari and Lue teaches as shown above the method of claim 13, wherein the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is different from a second contact structure width of the second contact structure [disclosed with sufficient specificity Harari Paragraph 0130 “each of thickness between 5 and 15 nanometers” an embodiment wherein the widths are different such as 5 nanometers and 15 nanometers at the extreme ends of the range]. Alternatively, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that “the first contact structure has a first contact structure width which is different from a second contact structure width of the second contact structure”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to as a part of routine optimization of the contact structure widths and the result effected variable thermal diffusion and/or buffer for thermal diffusion provided between the source/drain and the channel layer [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari]. Claim 19 Zhang teaches as shown above the method of claim 18. Zhang does not teach forming a contact structure having a lower resistance than the channel layer, wherein the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of the source and/or the drain. Harari teaches a contact structure (754 and/or 755 fig. 7d-1) having a lower resistance than a channel layer (comprising 756 and 757 fig. 7d-1) [Sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130, wherein contact structures 754 and 755 are disclosed as heavily doped polysilicon in “N+ doped polysilicon” and channel layer 756 and 757 are disclosed as lightly doped polysilicon “P- doped polysilicon”], the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of a source and/or a drain [sufficiently illustrated fig. 7d-1]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari such that “a contact structure having a lower resistance than the channel layer, wherein the contact structure is interposed between the channel layer and at least a portion of the source and/or the drain”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to reduce undesirable thermal diffusion of the dopants from the source/drains into the channel [sufficiently disclosed paragraph 0130 Harari “Because of the relatively significantly higher conductivity of the metallic material at the core, the N-type doping concentration of the ultra-thin N+ doped polysilicon can be reduced by one or two orders of magnitude, reducing undesirable thermal diffusion of the N-type dopant into the P-type dopant of the channel”]. In addition, combining equivalents known for the same purpose is prima facie type obviousness [See MPEP 2144.06]. In this case it is combining known methods of manufacturing Three-dimensional vertical transistor structures with lateral channels for the purposes of forming memory and/or storage device Claims 3-5, 14-15, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang in view of Harari as applied to the claims above, and further in view of US 11133329 B2 Lue et al hereafter “Lue”. Claim 3 Zhang in view of Harari does teaches the method of claim 2, further comprising: Forming a dielectric core (66 fig. 11A-11C )extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer [sufficiently illustrated fig. 11A-11C]. Zhang in view of Harari does not teach forming gate extension structures extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer, wherein a portion the first contact structure is interposed between the gate extension structure and the drain. Lue teaches forming gate extension structures (208 fig. 2, met under MPEP 2112.01 as the structures are structurally and/or compositionally the same) extending along portions of a channel layer (206 fig. 2) in the first direction (left to right of fig. 2), coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer [sufficiently illustrated fig. 2], interfacing outer surfaces of a source (210 fig. 2), a drain (212 fig. 2), and a dielectric core (214 fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari in further view of Lue such that the process includes “forming gate extension structures extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to provide additional separation between sources and/or drain [Lue column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5 in “As illustrated, the first conductive pillar 210 and the second conductive pillar 212 are separated from one another by both the insulator 214 and the insulating layer 208”] and/or to increase the effective channel length between source and drain structures [sufficiently illustrated fig. 2 Lue and in view of the disclosed separation of the source and drain column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5 ]. In addition, combining equivalents known for the same purpose is prima facie type obviousness [See MPEP 2144.06]. In this case it is methods of manufacturing vertical transistors with lateral channels for the purpose of forming memory and/or storage devices. Claim 4 Zhang in view of Harari and Lue teaches as shown above the method of claim 3, As rejected above Zhang in view Harari and Lue does not teach wherein the drain has a drain first width in the second direction at locations proximate to the gate extension structure, and a drain second width in the second direction at locations distal from the gate extension structure, the drain second width being larger than the drain first width. However, Lue does teach an embodiment (fig. 10) of the device as matched above and illustrated fig. 2 wherein the drain [see annotation below] has a drain first width [see annotation below] in the second direction at locations proximate to the gate extension structure [the side of the drain near the gate extension illustrated fig. 10], and a drain second width [see annotation below] in the second direction at locations distal from the gate extension structure [the side of the drain away from the gate extension structure illustrated fig. 10], the drain second width being larger than the drain first width [sufficiently illustrated fig. 10]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in further view of Lue such that “the drain has a drain first width in the second direction at locations proximate to the gate extension structure, and a drain second width in the second direction at locations distal from the gate extension structure, the drain second width being larger than the drain first width”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the relative shape/widths of the drain and the gate extension structure to optimize the result effected variable of the separation between the source and drain structures along the channel and/or the effective channel length [sufficiently illustrated fig. 10 Lue and in view of the disclosed separation of the source and drain column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5]. PNG media_image1.png 222 354 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 10: highlighting widths of a drain Claim 5 Zhang in view of Harari and Lue teach as shown above the method of claim 3, wherein a first axial end of the gate extension structure is disposed axially outwards of an axially inward edge of the first contact structure that is proximate to the source in the first direction [met in view the modifications of Lue and Harari, wherein Lue teaches and sufficiently illustrates fig. 2 ~ the gate extension structure is disposed axially outwards of an axially inward edge of the source in the first direction~ and Harari teaches and illustrates fig. 7D-1 ~the first contact structure completely encloses the source and/or drain~], and a second axial end of the gate extension structure opposite the first axial end is axially aligned with the axially inward edge of the first contact structure [met in view of the modifications of Harari and Lue as discussed above wherein Harari illustrates fig. 2 a left and right end (first and second ends) of the gate extension structure are laterally aligned and/or aligned right to left (an axial direction) of fig. 2, in view of the modification of the first contact structure, the first contact structure is also aligned in this manner]. PNG media_image2.png 546 496 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 16 Zhang: highlighting the direction of axial alignment for the source and drain PNG media_image3.png 585 473 media_image3.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 7d-1 Harari: highlighting the direction of axial alignment of the contact structures. PNG media_image4.png 441 753 media_image4.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 2 Lue: highlighting a direction of axial alignment across ends of the gate extension structure Claim 14 Zhang in view of Harari teaches the method of claim 13, further comprising; Forming a dielectric core (66 fig. 11A-11C) Zhang in view of Harari does not teach forming gate extension structures extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer, wherein a portion the first contact structure is interposed between the gate extension structure and the drain. Lue teaches forming gate extension structures (208 fig. 2, met under MPEP 2112.01 as the structures are structurally and/or compositionally the same) extending along portions of a channel layer (206 fig. 2) in the first direction (left to right of fig. 2), coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer [sufficiently illustrated fig. 2], interfacing outer surfaces of a source (210 fig. 2), a drain (212 fig. 2), and a dielectric core (214 fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari in further view of Lue such that the process includes “forming gate extension structures extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to provide additional separation between sources and/or drain [Lue column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5 in “As illustrated, the first conductive pillar 210 and the second conductive pillar 212 are separated from one another by both the insulator 214 and the insulating layer 208”] and/or to increase the effective channel length between source and drain structures [sufficiently illustrated fig. 2 Lue and in view of the disclosed separation of the source and drain column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5 ]. In addition, combining equivalents known for the same purpose is prima facie type obviousness [See MPEP 2144.06]. In this case it is methods of manufacturing vertical transistors with lateral channels for the purpose of forming memory and/or storage devices. Claim 15 Zhang in view of Harari and Lue as shown above the method of claim 14, As rejected above Zhang in view Harari and Lue does not teach wherein the drain has a drain first width in the second direction at locations proximate to the gate extension structure, and a drain second width in the second direction at locations distal from the gate extension structure, the drain second width being larger than the drain first width. However, Lue does teach an embodiment (fig. 10) of the device as matched above and illustrated fig. 2 wherein the drain [see annotation below] has a drain first width [see annotation below] in the second direction at locations proximate to the gate extension structure [the side of the drain near the gate extension illustrated fig. 10], and a drain second width [see annotation below] in the second direction at locations distal from the gate extension structure [the side of the drain away from the gate extension structure illustrated fig. 10], the drain second width being larger than the drain first width [sufficiently illustrated fig. 10]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in further view of Lue such that “the drain has a drain first width in the second direction at locations proximate to the gate extension structure, and a drain second width in the second direction at locations distal from the gate extension structure, the drain second width being larger than the drain first width”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the relative shape/widths of the drain and the gate extension structure to optimize the result effected variable of the separation between the source and drain structures along the channel and/or the effective channel length [sufficiently illustrated fig. 10 Lue and in view of the disclosed separation of the source and drain column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5]. PNG media_image1.png 222 354 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 10: highlighting widths of a drain Claim 20 Zhang in view of Harari teaches as shown above the method of claim 19, further comprising a dielectric core (66 fig. 10A-10C). Zhang in view of Harari does not teach forming gate extension structures extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer, wherein a portion the first contact structure is interposed between the gate extension structure and the drain. Lue teaches forming gate extension structures (208 fig. 2, met under MPEP 2112.01 as the structures are structurally and/or compositionally the same) extending along portions of a channel layer (206 fig. 2) in the first direction (left to right of fig. 2), coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer [sufficiently illustrated fig. 2], interfacing outer surfaces of a source (210 fig. 2), a drain (212 fig. 2), and a dielectric core (214 fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang in view of Harari in further view of Lue such that the process includes “forming gate extension structures extending along portions of the channel layer in the first direction, and coupled to a radially inner surface of the channel layer”. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to provide additional separation between sources and/or drain [Lue column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5 in “As illustrated, the first conductive pillar 210 and the second conductive pillar 212 are separated from one another by both the insulator 214 and the insulating layer 208”] and/or to increase the effective channel length between source and drain structures [sufficiently illustrated fig. 2 Lue and in view of the disclosed separation of the source and drain column 6 lines 59 to column 7 line 5 ]. In addition, combining equivalents known for the same purpose is prima facie type obviousness [See MPEP 2144.06]. In this case it is methods of manufacturing vertical transistors with lateral channels for the purpose of forming memory and/or storage devices. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William C Trice whose telephone number is (703)756-1875. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached at (571) 270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WCT/Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /Britt Hanley/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733219
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING BACKSIDE ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND PLACEHOLDER ISOLATION STRUCTURE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727138
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND FORMING METHOD THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721167
COOLING SYSTEM
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12721155
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707818
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 5m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 55 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month