Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/792,762

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Priority
Jul 22, 2011 — JP 2011-161383 +4 more
Examiner
PROSTOR, ANDREW VICTOR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
39 granted / 41 resolved
+35.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
60
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 41 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 13/549867 filed on 02/26/2013. Status of Claims Claims 2-13 are pending. Claims 1 is cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. Claim 2-13 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by US 2011/0114945 A1 Yamazaki et al (herein “Yamazaki”). Regarding Claim 2, Yamazaki discloses: A semiconductor device (see generally Figs. 1A and 1B showing cross-sectional view of semiconductor device, Figs. 3A-3E showing manufacturing steps of forming oxide semiconductor transistor, and Figs. 4A-4D showing manufacturing steps of forming electrical connection between transistors, reference made to Fig. 1A unless otherwise specified) comprising: a substrate (#100); an oxide insulating layer (#138) over the substrate (#100); an oxide semiconductor layer (#140), a source electrode layer (#142a), and a drain electrode layer (#142b) over and in contact with the oxide insulating layer (#138); a silicon oxide film (#146) over and in contact with a top surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140), a top surface and a side surface of the source electrode layer (#142a), and a top surface and a side surface of the drain electrode layer (#142b); a first insulating film (#150) over the silicon oxide film (#146); and a first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) and a second wiring layer (#154e, #158d) over the first insulating film (#150), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises indium, gallium, and zinc ([0113]-[0116]. [0131]), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a channel formation region (middle portion of #140) of a first transistor (#162), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c, #158c) is electrically connected to the source electrode layer (#142a) via a first opening provided in the silicon oxide film (#146) and the first insulating film (#150), wherein the second wiring layer (#154e, #158d) is electrically connected to the drain electrode layer (#142b) via a second opening provided in the silicon oxide film (#146) and the first insulating film (#150), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c, #158c) is electrically connected to a second transistor (#160), wherein, in a cross-sectional view, the source electrode layer (#142a) is in contact with the top surface and a side surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140), wherein, in the cross-sectional view, the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c, #158c) overlaps with the side surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) and the source electrode layer (#142a), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) has a first thickness ([0119], “…The thickness of the oxide semiconductor layer is set in the range of 2 nm to 200 nm, preferably 5 nm to 30 nm.”), wherein the source electrode layer (#142a) has a second thickness ([0150], “Note that by the oxidation treatment, the oxide regions 143 are formed in part of the source or drain electrode 142a and the source or drain electrode 142b (particularly, portions corresponding to side surfaces thereof)… Note that the oxide regions 143 are sufficiently effective when having a thickness of 5 nm or more (preferably, 10 nm or more).”), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c, #158c) has a third thickness (see Fig. 1A), wherein the first thickness is greater than the second thickness (see [0119] and [0150], range of first thickness is defined as 2nm to 200nm and second thickness is greater than 5nm), and wherein the third thickness is greater than the first thickness (see Fig. 1A). Note, the element “a third thickness” as currently claimed does not specify a direction in which the thickness is in reference to. Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation the thickness can be interpreted as in a vertical direction with respect to the page, a horizontal direction with respect to the page, or in/out with respect to the page. With respect to the drawings, it appears the only instance where at least a portion of the thickness of the first wiring layer (#465a in Fig. 1E of the instant application) is larger than the thickness of the oxide semiconductor layer (#403 in Fig. 1A of the instant application) is in the vertical direction with respect to the page. Therefore, the claimed element will be interpreted and examined as such. Regarding Claim 3, Yamazaki discloses: A semiconductor device (see generally Figs. 1A and 1B showing cross-sectional view of semiconductor device, Figs. 3A-3E showing manufacturing steps of forming oxide semiconductor transistor, and Figs. 4A-4D showing manufacturing steps of forming electrical connection between transistors, reference made to Fig. 1A unless otherwise specified) comprising: a substrate (#100); an oxide insulating layer (#138) over the substrate (#100); an oxide semiconductor layer (#140), a source electrode layer (#142a), and a drain electrode layer (#142b) over and in contact with the oxide insulating layer (#138); a silicon oxide film (#146) over and in contact with a top surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140), a top surface and a side surface of the source electrode layer (#142a), and a top surface and a side surface of the drain electrode layer (#142b); a first insulating film (#150) over the silicon oxide film (#146); and a first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) and a second wiring layer (#154e, #158d) over the first insulating film (#150), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises indium, gallium, and zinc ([0113]-[0116]. [0131]), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a channel formation region (middle portion of #140) of a first transistor (#162), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) is electrically connected to the source electrode layer (#142a) via a first opening provided in the silicon oxide film (#146) and the first insulating film (#150), wherein the second wiring layer (#154e, #158d) is electrically connected to the drain electrode layer (#142b) via a second opening provided in the silicon oxide film (#146) and the first insulating film (#150), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) is electrically connected to a second transistor (#160), wherein, in a cross-sectional view, the source electrode layer (#142a) is in contact with the top surface and a side surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140), wherein, in the cross-sectional view, the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) overlaps with the side surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) and the source electrode layer (#142a), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) has a first thickness ([0119], “…The thickness of the oxide semiconductor layer is set in the range of 2 nm to 200 nm, preferably 5 nm to 30 nm.”), wherein the source electrode layer (#142a) has a second thickness ([0150], “Note that by the oxidation treatment, the oxide regions 143 are formed in part of the source or drain electrode 142a and the source or drain electrode 142b (particularly, portions corresponding to side surfaces thereof)… Note that the oxide regions 143 are sufficiently effective when having a thickness of 5 nm or more (preferably, 10 nm or more).”), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) has a third thickness (see Fig. 1A), wherein the first thickness is greater than the second thickness (see [0119] and [0150], range of first thickness is defined as 2nm to 200nm and second thickness is greater than 5nm), wherein the third thickness is greater than the first thickness (see Fig. 1A). wherein the side surface of the source electrode layer (#142a) has a tapered shape (see tapered/slopes sidewall of source and drain electrode structures in Fig. 1A), and wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) has an island shape ([0108], Fig. 3B). Note, the element “a third thickness” as currently claimed does not specify a direction in which the thickness is in reference to. Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation the thickness can be interpreted as in a vertical direction with respect to the page, a horizontal direction with respect to the page, or in/out with respect to the page. With respect to the drawings, it appears the only instance where at least a portion of the thickness of the first wiring layer (#465a in Fig. 1E of the instant application) is larger than the thickness of the oxide semiconductor layer (#403 in Fig. 1A of the instant application) is in the vertical direction with respect to the page. Therefore, the claimed element will be interpreted and examined as such. Regarding Claim 4, Yamazaki discloses: A semiconductor device (see generally Figs. 1A and 1B showing cross-sectional view of semiconductor device, Figs. 3A-3E showing manufacturing steps of forming oxide semiconductor transistor, and Figs. 4A-4D showing manufacturing steps of forming electrical connection between transistors, reference made to Fig. 1A unless otherwise specified) comprising: a substrate (#100); an oxide insulating layer (#138) over the substrate (#100); an oxide semiconductor layer (#140), a source electrode layer (#142a), and a drain electrode layer (#142b) over and in contact with the oxide insulating layer (#138); a silicon oxide film (#146) over and in contact with a top surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140), a top surface and a side surface of the source electrode layer (#142a), and a top surface and a side surface of the drain electrode layer (#142b); a first insulating film (#150) over the silicon oxide film (#146); and a first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) and a second wiring layer (#154e, #158d) over the first insulating film (#150), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises indium, gallium, and zinc ([0113]-[0116]. [0131]), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a channel formation region (middle portion of #140) of a first transistor (#162), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) is electrically connected to the source electrode layer (#142a) via a first opening provided in the silicon oxide film (#146) and the first insulating film (#150), wherein the second wiring layer (#154e, #158d) is electrically connected to the drain electrode layer (#142b) via a second opening provided in the silicon oxide film (#146) and the first insulating film (#150), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) is electrically connected to a second transistor (#160), wherein, in a cross-sectional view, the source electrode layer (#142a) is in contact with the top surface and a side surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140), wherein, in the cross-sectional view, the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) overlaps with the side surface of the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) and the source electrode layer (#142a), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) has a first thickness ([0119], “…The thickness of the oxide semiconductor layer is set in the range of 2 nm to 200 nm, preferably 5 nm to 30 nm.”), wherein the source electrode layer (#142a) has a second thickness ([0150], “Note that by the oxidation treatment, the oxide regions 143 are formed in part of the source or drain electrode 142a and the source or drain electrode 142b (particularly, portions corresponding to side surfaces thereof)… Note that the oxide regions 143 are sufficiently effective when having a thickness of 5 nm or more (preferably, 10 nm or more).”), wherein the first wiring layer (#154d, #158c) has a third thickness (see Fig. 1A), wherein the first thickness is greater than the second thickness ([0119] and [0150], range of first thickness is defined as 2nm to 200nm and second thickness is greater than 5nm), wherein the third thickness is greater than the first thickness (see Fig. 1A), wherein the side surface of the source electrode layer (#142a) has a tapered shape (see tapered/slopes sidewall of source and drain electrode structures in Fig. 1A), wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) has an island shape ([0108], Fig. 3B), and wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a c-axis-aligned crystal region ([0131]). Note, the element “a third thickness” as currently claimed does not specify a direction in which the thickness is in reference to. Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation the thickness can be interpreted as in a vertical direction with respect to the page, a horizontal direction with respect to the page, or in/out with respect to the page. With respect to the drawings, it appears the only instance where at least a portion of the thickness of the first wiring layer (#465a in Fig. 1E of the instant application) is larger than the thickness of the oxide semiconductor layer (#403 in Fig. 1A of the instant application) is in the vertical direction with respect to the page. Therefore, the claimed element will be interpreted and examined as such. Regarding Claim 5, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 2, Yamazaki further discloses: further comprising: a gate electrode layer (#148) overlapping with the channel formation region (middle portion of #140) of the first transistor (#162), wherein the gate electrode layer (#148) has a fourth thickness (see Fig. 1A), and wherein the fourth thickness is greater than the third thickness (see Fig. 1A). Note, the element “a fourth thickness” as currently claimed does not specify a direction in which the thickness is in reference to. Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation the thickness can be interpreted as in a vertical direction with respect to the page, a horizontal direction with respect to the page, or in/out with respect to the page. With respect to the drawings, it appears the only instance where at least a portion of the thickness of the gate electrode layer (#401 in Fig. 1B of the instant application) is larger than the thickness of the wiring layers (#465a and #465b in Fig. 1E of the instant application) is in the horizontal direction with respect to the page. Therefore, the claimed element will be interpreted and examined as such. Regarding Claim 6, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 3, Yamazaki further discloses: further comprising: a gate electrode layer (#148) overlapping with the channel formation region (middle portion of #140) of the first transistor (#162), wherein the gate electrode layer (#148) has a fourth thickness (see Fig. 1A), and wherein the fourth thickness is greater than the third thickness (see Fig. 1A). Note, the element “a fourth thickness” as currently claimed does not specify a direction in which the thickness is in reference to. Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation the thickness can be interpreted as in a vertical direction with respect to the page, a horizontal direction with respect to the page, or in/out with respect to the page. With respect to the drawings, it appears the only instance where at least a portion of the thickness of the gate electrode layer (#401 in Fig. 1B of the instant application) is larger than the thickness of the wiring layers (#465a and #465b in Fig. 1E of the instant application) is in the horizontal direction with respect to the page. Therefore, the claimed element will be interpreted and examined as such. Regarding Claim 7, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 4, Yamazaki further discloses: further comprising: a gate electrode layer (#148) overlapping with the channel formation region (middle portion of #140) of the first transistor (#162), wherein the gate electrode layer (#148) has a fourth thickness (see Fig. 1A), and wherein the fourth thickness is greater than the third thickness (see Fig. 1A). Note, the element “a fourth thickness” as currently claimed does not specify a direction in which the thickness is in reference to. Thus, under the broadest reasonable interpretation the thickness can be interpreted as in a vertical direction with respect to the page, a horizontal direction with respect to the page, or in/out with respect to the page. With respect to the drawings, it appears the only instance where at least a portion of the thickness of the gate electrode layer (#401 in Fig. 1B of the instant application) is larger than the thickness of the wiring layers (#465a and #465b in Fig. 1E of the instant application) is in the horizontal direction with respect to the page. Therefore, the claimed element will be interpreted and examined as such. Regarding Claim 8, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 2, Yamazaki further discloses: wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a dopant ([0075]), and wherein the dopant is one of phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, boron, aluminum, nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, fluorine, chlorine, and titanium ([0075]). Regarding Claim 9, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 3, Yamazaki further discloses: wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a dopant ([0075]), and wherein the dopant is one of phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, boron, aluminum, nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, fluorine, chlorine, and titanium ([0075]). Regarding Claim 10, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 4, Yamazaki further discloses: wherein the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) comprises a dopant ([0075]), and wherein the dopant is one of phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, boron, aluminum, nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, fluorine, chlorine, and titanium ([0075]). Regarding Claim 11, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 2, Yamazaki further discloses: wherein a composition ratio of gallium in the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) is lower than a composition ratio of zinc in the oxide semiconductor layer ([0116]). Regarding Claim 12, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 3, Yamazaki further discloses: wherein a composition ratio of gallium in the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) is lower than a composition ratio of zinc in the oxide semiconductor layer ([0116]). Regarding Claim 13, Yamazaki discloses: The semiconductor device according to claim 4, Yamazaki further discloses: wherein a composition ratio of gallium in the oxide semiconductor layer (#140) is lower than a composition ratio of zinc in the oxide semiconductor layer ([0116]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Andrew V. Prostor whose telephone number is (571) 272-2686. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00a-4:30p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S Kim can be reached at (571) 272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at (866) 217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call (800) 786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or (571) 272-1000. /ANDREW VICTOR PROSTOR/Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /CHRISTINE S. KIM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740166
IMAGE SENSOR AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740109
DEVICE HAVING MG CONTACTS COUPLED BY MP CONTACT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12720820
PARTIAL GATE CUT STRUCTURES IN AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12701762
CARBON-CONTAINING CAP LAYER FOR DOPED SEMICONDUCTOR EPITAXIAL LAYER
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696610
SELF-ADHERENT FLEXIBLE THIN FILM STACKS AND PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICES INCLUDING SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.9%)
3y 4m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 41 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month